Still no response. So despite the Hate Crimes Guidance asserting that the ‘victim’ may never be challenged - as this is ‘secondary victimisation’ - it seems they DO operate a filter with regard to taking complaints seriously.
So may we please know what triage system is in operation? Why is saying ‘my dog would call me a Nazi for cheese’ deemed necessary to record on a police data base for 6 years but this - I assume - is not?
Will is of course here sneering and denigrating women with a protected belief - but we aren’t considered worthy of protection as a ‘monitored strand’ for hate crime purposes.
It would be so wonderful if those in charge of this insane system would just pause, catch their breath and think - is this strategy actually working? With ‘hate’ on the rise and women protesting all over the shop -
- might it be time for a refresh? A rethink? Unless of course this kind of chaos and misery was the end game all along.
So which is it? Incompetence? Or malice?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Reminder. To assess if a child under 16 has ‘Gillick competence’ to consent to medical treatment is a highly fact specific assessment of an individual child, which must examine their understanding of the nature and consequences of the treatment.
No court can make a blanket decision that children of a certain age can or cannot consent - that would need an Act of Parliament. The High Court in Bell did NOT say children under 16 could NEVER consent to medical transition - they said it was ‘unlikely’.
It is utterly impossible that the Court of Appeal will say ‘hey kids, you rush out and get your puberty blockers now, it’s all good!’ That would be contrary to Supreme Court ruling in Gillick as well as offensive to sense.
1. Because ‘sex’ and ‘gender’ are very different and to pretend they are not puts women at risk of harm. 2. Because a man’s wish to be validated is not automatically more powerful than a woman’s right to safety and dignity.
3. Because the conflation of ‘sex’ with ‘gender’ leads child into the lie that ‘sex’ is something they can change or dispose of with no consequences 4. Because those who support ‘gender ideology’ demand absolute capitulation or they will hurt you
5. Because the conflation of sex and gender is leading directly to the collapse of the rule of law, requiring us to raise over a million pounds in crowdfunding to put it right
Thank you @KLBfax. You have opened the doors to give us this opportunity. To discuss the evidence that informs the treatment of children without ludicrous accusations of bigotry or some kind of ‘phobia’.
Of course such accusations will still be made. But once these anonymous social media accounts had influence over actual clinicians. That influence I hope now is waning. Doctors - and insurers - cannot skate over the need for proper assessment of a child’s competence to consent.
The Court of Appeal are likely to return decision making to the doctors and patient, with application to court only when there is an unresolvable dispute between the two.
Turned replies off, no surprise there. What on Earth does ‘triage’ mean to her? I understand it to be the wholly sensible practice of assessing risk and harm before acting. Single sex spaces remove the burden of risk assessment from women. Why is this a bad thing?
Women do not want to have to ‘triage’ every male body that they are in a confined space with. And it may be impossible for them to do so, if they are in hospital or in prison.
It is interesting to note that David Paisley encouraged people to report me for publishing the email and telephone number of The View magazine - which is published on their website and therefore hardly private information.
Because it’s a very clear illustration of how some people are operating at a level of personal animosity rather than a cool appraisal of the actual facts. I am in excellent company when it comes to being abused by The View.
But of course it is not just women of relative power and privilege caught in their net. Their fraudulent operations are even more despicable when you consider who they are using - vulnerable women, some of whom would benefit from rehabilitation.
Why would I want to read anything that starts from this ridiculous premise? I had a chemically induced menopause aged 43. My womb is of entirely no use. I am still a woman.
What makes me a woman is the fact that my body developed along the pathway of the female reproductive system - with all that entails for my physical strength and vulnerability to males etc. It doesn’t matter a jot if my womb works or ever worked.
My gender is probably ‘disagreeable masculine’ as I never wear high heels or lipstick and people tell me I am rude and aggressive. But still a woman. I don’t confuse my personality with my actual sex.