The Michael Sussman indictment out of the Durham investigation, via the Washington Post. context-cdn.washingtonpost.com/notes/prod/def…
lol ok 
To explain, the whole basis for this indictment is that (a) DOJ hazily contends that Sussman represented the Clinton campaign and (b) Jim Baker doesn't remember him saying that he did and this other guy's hearsay notes suggest he said he wasn't there on behalf of a client...
And, they allege, if the FBI had known he was there on behalf of a client, they might have determined that he might have a political angle on this whole thing and that would've been material to their thinking. ...
But here we have a quote from the hearsay document and—lo and behold—it says, on the line below the allegedly incriminating mistruth, that this man represents the DNC, the Clinton Fdn, etc. So It's gonna be hard to argue they were blind to the politics he might bring.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
