So, our friend "will", is one of the most stubborn, dishonest arguers around. Peruse his tweets if you like: @su3su2u1. If you hear him tell it, he's here to find arguments to convince his family to get vaccinated.
What really attracted my attention though, is that he didn't seem to want my help in that regard. Very, very strange.
So "Will" seems to have about 562 tweets, oldest one in mid-august. But until very recently I had him muted for much earlier time-wasting, so he's most likely deleting his tweets periodically.
What's wrong with this picture? 7 year old account, just 4 followers. Last public tweet, echoing Kavanagh.
Who are his followers? Kavanagh and UberFeminist.
His 3 likes this year? Kavanagh and UberFeminist.
What of his tweets? Most of the time amplifying Kavanagh's "arguments". Sometimes freelances on his own, mostly to annoy @EduEngineer or people who reply to my threads.
The last week I watched him claiming that Bret Weinstein and Andrew Wakefield were basically the same, and waste unthinkable amounts of @imursuperherooo's time. Always with unsubstantiated claims, always shifting goalposts.
But the last straw for me is that he accused me of getting some facts about Edward Jenner wrong in a now deleted tweet. Apparently he was not rejected, and in fact the Royal Society ended up publishing him a few months later.
Then he proceeded to build a whole rant on the back of his amazing discovery.
Except he was wrong about that, as I demonstrated, based on the royal academy itself. Oops. His reaction?
He deletes the tweet wrongly accusing me and doubles down! The fact that none other than Kavanagh stepped in to help him out with extra insults, which should surprise nobody of course.
So I am forced to admit it. I wasted my time. I may have been the cause for others wasting their time. This time I'm not muting. This troll's crossover with my timeline ends the way the other trolls' did.
And what do we do when Twitter gives us trollemons? We make trollemonade! In particular, we donate to the FLCCC, which I have on good authority is Will's least favorite charity in the whole wide world. The donation page is here: covid19criticalcare.com/network-suppor…
And with a few clicks you get to not only feel good about helping Frontline doctors, but also extra awesome for giving trolls the middle finger. Because spiteful altruism is the best kind of altruism.
What about our Trollemonade? Apparently it's highly concentrated and seriously addictive. 🤣
Will, the FLCCC is grateful for the contributions you have inspired.
Let's do a thread doing a close reading of Douglas Murray's article in the NY Post, in which he writes about his encounter with Dave Smith on Joe Rogan's podcast.
If you care about facts and truth and stuff, I promise this will be highly illuminating. 🧵
"Having not spoken to Joe since the wars in Ukraine and Israel started, I had become increasingly irked that the guests he has had on have been almost entirely anti-Ukraine and anti-Israel."
As many have demonstrated, this is false.
Since late 2023, at the very least these guests with strong pro-israel views have appeared at least once on the podcast.
Gad Saad
Mike Baker
Peter Zeihan
Douglas Murray
Coleman Hughes
Konstantin Kisin (3 times)
So, the Ukranian constitution gives the president the power to declare martial law, and explicitly says that parliamentary elections can be delayed until after martial law is lifted. For presidential elections it says they must happen every 5 years with no martial law exception.
Whitney Webb's failure to admit error, (and how to survive the 2025+ infowars without getting blackpilled)
I had a run-in with Whitney Webb this week. This THREAD will try to walk you through the story in excruciating detail.
This will take a while, but I think it's worth it.
It all started when @BretWeinstein thanked @POTUS for withdrawing from the WHO. Bret had fought long and hard against the WHO pandemic treaty that was being pushed, so whoever had followed him knows how important this is.
@BretWeinstein @POTUS Whitney Webb felt the need to point out that "Trump also left the WHO in mid-2020 and then just redirected what was once WHO funding to the Gates-funded GAVI vaccine alliance."
Your favorite blackpill dealer, Whitney Webb, here with more trash data and vague insinuations.
In this episode, she claims Trump "redirected" WHO funding to GAVI. In reality, she is asserting that unrelated funding from USAID to GAVI was made because of the withdrawal from WHO in 2020.
The USAID funding to GAVI was part of a long-term funding stream that USAID had been providing to GAVI since 2001.
Some people are saying that maybe the 1.4B in 2016-2020 was concentrated in 2020. Not true. A billion was pledged for the period of 2015-2018. Then 1.16 billion was pledged for the period between 2020-2023. Taking inflation into account, that is effectively the same amount, for the same duration of time.
In trying to keep up with the vast pace of developments across many fronts, I have started to hypothesize something. Perhaps it is oversimplified. Perhaps it is just wrong. I am open to all eventualities, I'm sharing this to get feedback.
When Mike Johnson did his complete turnaround, I started to wonder what he could possibly have been told that changed his view so drastically. It is tempting to think it was some personal threat to his reputation or family. But that is a low-context explanation that could apply to anything, and as such is not very informative, imo.
What if, what he was told, is that what is going on is pretty much the opening moves for WW3? See the map below and think about what was recently approved with the help of Mike Johnson:
- Warrantless wiretapping
- TikTok forced sale or banning
- Funding for Ukraine
- Funding for Israel
- Funding for Taiwan
- No funding for strenghtening the border (and actually perhaps some funding to get *more* people into the US)
Basically, infowar funding for the internals of the empire, and actual war funding to support the borderlands (Taiwan, Israel, Ukraine) against the rising BRICS powers. And an entry to the US of cheap workforce that will be needed to set up a new industrial base. At best we end up with a new Cold War. If we're lucky.
Maybe I'm giving people in power more credit than they're worth. Perhaps I refuse to believe they're simply arrogant and incompetent. But for better or worse, I can't stop thinking about this map, and what it means for the world.
I may have classified some countries wrong, by the way, I'm open to suggestions on specifics. In particular, It's likely that Hungary and Serbia should be at the very least a kind of greyzone. Also, US influence in south Asia probably goes further than I marked. And of course Africa is a competition zone, with Russia and China making inroads and France/EU losing ground, but nothing yet completely settled.
Anyway, hopefully this is interesting to others as it was to me. (runs away and hides in bunker)
Was about to mention that the poles are about to become a zone of intense competition between the blocks.