So, our friend "will", is one of the most stubborn, dishonest arguers around. Peruse his tweets if you like: @su3su2u1. If you hear him tell it, he's here to find arguments to convince his family to get vaccinated.
What really attracted my attention though, is that he didn't seem to want my help in that regard. Very, very strange.
So "Will" seems to have about 562 tweets, oldest one in mid-august. But until very recently I had him muted for much earlier time-wasting, so he's most likely deleting his tweets periodically.
What's wrong with this picture? 7 year old account, just 4 followers. Last public tweet, echoing Kavanagh.
Who are his followers? Kavanagh and UberFeminist.
His 3 likes this year? Kavanagh and UberFeminist.
What of his tweets? Most of the time amplifying Kavanagh's "arguments". Sometimes freelances on his own, mostly to annoy @EduEngineer or people who reply to my threads.
The last week I watched him claiming that Bret Weinstein and Andrew Wakefield were basically the same, and waste unthinkable amounts of @imursuperherooo's time. Always with unsubstantiated claims, always shifting goalposts.
But the last straw for me is that he accused me of getting some facts about Edward Jenner wrong in a now deleted tweet. Apparently he was not rejected, and in fact the Royal Society ended up publishing him a few months later.
Then he proceeded to build a whole rant on the back of his amazing discovery.
Except he was wrong about that, as I demonstrated, based on the royal academy itself. Oops. His reaction?
He deletes the tweet wrongly accusing me and doubles down! The fact that none other than Kavanagh stepped in to help him out with extra insults, which should surprise nobody of course.
So I am forced to admit it. I wasted my time. I may have been the cause for others wasting their time. This time I'm not muting. This troll's crossover with my timeline ends the way the other trolls' did.
And what do we do when Twitter gives us trollemons? We make trollemonade! In particular, we donate to the FLCCC, which I have on good authority is Will's least favorite charity in the whole wide world. The donation page is here: covid19criticalcare.com/network-suppor…
And with a few clicks you get to not only feel good about helping Frontline doctors, but also extra awesome for giving trolls the middle finger. Because spiteful altruism is the best kind of altruism.
What about our Trollemonade? Apparently it's highly concentrated and seriously addictive. 🤣
Will, the FLCCC is grateful for the contributions you have inspired.
Allright everyone, let's do this. Send me all the various reasons that have been cited by the US government, or the broader regime, for the US operation on Venezuela. Ideally with quotes or video attached to your replies so we can put them all together.
The EU has sanctioned Jaques Baud, one of the most lucid and evidence based analysts of the war. Apparently, this means that as a Swiss citizen, he cannot even fly over EU territory, which means he cannot leave his country. This is just one of many consequences the penalty, imposed with no due process or any kind of court hearing, has for this former Swiss intelligence analyst and former NATO advisor.
His crime? Quoting the words of Ukranian officials verbatim. Read on.
This is the entirety of the accusations against Colonel Jaques Baud, as written by the EU: ""Jacques Baud, former colonel of the Swiss army and strategic analyst, is a regular guest on pro-Russian television and radio programs. He acts as a mouthpiece for pro-Russian propaganda and spreads conspiracy theories, for example by accusing Ukraine of having orchestrated its own invasion in order to join NATO. Therefore, Jacques Baud is responsible for actions or political measures attributable to the government of the Russian Federation that undermine or threaten the stability or security in a third country (Ukraine) through participation in the use of information manipulation and influence operations, implements them, or supports them.""
You will note that they accuse him of SPEECH CRIMES only. Now lets dig into the specifics a little because the insanity of the situation is off the charts.
Did you now that the PRINCIPLE trial out of the UK found that IVM was superior to the usual care in practically every subgroup it tested, but it sat on the results for ~600 days? When it finally published, it buried these results in page 346 of the appendix.
The main body of the paper they published is even more bizarre --
1. They claim that "clinically meaningful" meant 1.5 days improvement in median time to recovery. 2. They admit that ivermectin showed >2 days to recovery. 3. Their main conclusion is that ivermectin is unlikely to provide clinically meaningful improvement in recovery.
The secret sauce in their conclusion is that their target metric of HR 1.2 is based on 9 days of recovery needed (after randomization). Even though they had ran many hundreds of patients by the time they started the ivm arm they knew the days needed for recovery were >14.
Let's do a thread doing a close reading of Douglas Murray's article in the NY Post, in which he writes about his encounter with Dave Smith on Joe Rogan's podcast.
If you care about facts and truth and stuff, I promise this will be highly illuminating. 🧵
"Having not spoken to Joe since the wars in Ukraine and Israel started, I had become increasingly irked that the guests he has had on have been almost entirely anti-Ukraine and anti-Israel."
As many have demonstrated, this is false.
Since late 2023, at the very least these guests with strong pro-israel views have appeared at least once on the podcast.
Gad Saad
Mike Baker
Peter Zeihan
Douglas Murray
Coleman Hughes
Konstantin Kisin (3 times)
So, the Ukranian constitution gives the president the power to declare martial law, and explicitly says that parliamentary elections can be delayed until after martial law is lifted. For presidential elections it says they must happen every 5 years with no martial law exception.