ANTHRAX ELVIS --- Giuliani, Amerithrax, the National Enquirer, and the King of Rock and Roll. A thread.
In 1977, the National Enquirer paid Elvis's cousin $18,000 to snap a photo of the King in his coffin. The photo graced the cover of the tabloid in an issue that would go on to sell an astonishing 6.5 million copies.
This photo would also become fodder for innumerable "Elvis is Alive" theories, based on the supposedly impossible placement of his head, his unusually pudgy nose, etc.
The original photo was kept at the Boca Raton HQ of American Media, Inc. (AMI), the company that owned the Enquirer. It was valued at $1 million. In Oct. 2001, the HQ was the target of the first of a series of anthrax attacks, which would kill AMI photo editor Robert Stevens.
Media reports initially traced the anthrax to a strange love letter addressed to Jennifer Lopez, which contained a "soapy, powdery substance" and a cheap Star of David charm. However, the actual source of the anthrax remains undetermined. nbcnews.com/id/wbna3067576
At any rate, the anthrax caused the entire building to be shut down for years. Though valued at $10 million, it was sold to a real estate investor named David Rustine for a mere $40,000 in a deal that also stated he should destroy all personal property inside.
That property included AMI's massive archive, which, in addition to the famous Elvis Photo, contained some 5 million pictures. This would become the subject of contract disputes and a heated lawsuit. nypost.com/2005/08/17/rud…
Rustine contracted clean-up duties to a newly created company called BioONE, a joint venture between Sabre Technical Services (which had decontaminated anthrax-infected buildings in DC) and...Rudy Giuliani's company, Giuliani Partners. heraldtribune.com/article/LK/200…
But BioONE wasn't just cleaning the building, Rustine also agreed to lease it to BioONE for use as its new headquarters. As Boca Raton mayor Steve Abrams put it, "It used to be home of the National Enquirer and now it's the home of a national hero." nysun.com/new-york/giuli…
BioONE plan to fumigate the building with chlorine dioxide, a process that only took about 24 hours. But BioONE never took over the building and never got paid for its services. BioONE refused to release cleanup data. ph.ucla.edu/epi/bioter/for…
The source of the dispute was the photo archive. The photographers who took the pictures demanded to be given back their work. Lawsuits ensued. According to one suit, John Mason of Sabre/BioONE found the Elvis Photo and threatened to "lose" it unless his contract was extended.
Mason countersued, claiming he never made such a threat and that the Elvis Photo, along with the rest of the photo archive, was destroyed in accordance with Sabre's contract and *with the express assent of AMI*.
In fact, Mason's Answer/Counterclaim even attached a photo showing AMI's attorney, Daniel Rotstein, holding the Elvis Photo just before it was to be shredded.
Now, it's totally possible the photo wasn't actually shredded, and maybe what Rotstein is holding in that picture isn't even the original. What's important here is that AMI specifically authorized the total destruction of millions of photographs.
This is significant because AMI is widely known to be both a high-level extortion scheme and a "catch and kill" operation. David Pecker, who ran AMI from 1999-2020, has admitted a much.
e.g., during the 2016 election, Pecker—a close friend of Donald Trump—coordinated with Trump to buy up and suppress Playboy model Karen Macdougal's story of a sexual affair. theguardian.com/us-news/2018/d…
Pecker has admitted to keeping a safe full of dirt and hush money payments on Trump as well as damaging info on other celebs obtained by AMI with the intention of burying it. Employees of AMI said that this safe was "a great source of power for Pecker." courthousenews.com/national-enqui…
Knowing Pecker kept such tight control over his own safe of celebrity dirt, why did he so easily allow AMI's photo archive to be destroyed? Is it possible this was the entire reason AMI (acquired by Pecker just 2 years prior) was targeted in the first place?
In other words, did someone use anthrax to provide plausible cover for the destruction of decades' worth of dirt on all sorts of famous and powerful personages?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The CIA and the FBI weren't the only ones keeping suspiciously close tabs on Al Qaeda in the lead-up to 9/11. The Pentagon had a special unit called DO5, which produced numerous reports on the movements of OBL and identified KSM's house. truthout.org/articles/new-d…
DO5 was tasked with monitoring Bin Laden and other suspected terrorists in Afghanistan between 1998 and 2000 and constructing possible terrorism scenarios.
DO5 also worked domestically and even created fictional terrorist orgs used for "exercises." truthout.org/articles/repor…
According to a Pentagon whistleblower codenamed Iron Man, high-level DOD officials held discussions between Summer 2000 and June 2001 in which they determined that Al Qaeda was "likely to attack the World Trade Center and the Pentagon." truthout.org/articles/new-d…
In 2008, Mark Ruffalo's brother, Scott, a successful Hollywood hairdresser, was shot in the head in his Beverly Hills home. Present at the shooting was Shaha Adham, the granddaughter of Sheikh Kamal Adham—former Saudi intelligence chief & a Bush associate deeply involved in BCCI.
Scott was on life support for a week before he finally passed. A day before his death, Shaha, who'd fled the scene of the shooting, turned herself in (as did her boyfriend, Brian Scofield). Shaha told police that Scott had shot himself playing a game of Russian Roulette.
One problem with that story is that the coroner had ruled the death a homicide. Scott was shot at a downward 45-degree angle, inconsistent with a game of Russian Roulette. Regardless, Shaha and Scofield were released. The case remains unsolved. ronaldrichards.com/wp-content/upl…
In 1998, Philip Zelikow imagined "an act of catastrophic terrorism...like Pearl Harbor [that] would divide our past and future into before and after, ushering in crackdown on civil liberties, mass surveillance, and war. (h/t @ChrisRulon) foreignaffairs.com/articles/unite…
This was remarkably similar to the infamous language in PNAC's "Rebuilding America's Defenses," which spoke of a great transformation initiated by "a catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor." web.archive.org/web/2013081712…
Interestingly, Zelikow, in a 2017 speech and a 2019 book co-written with Condi Rice, would begin to use a very similar term–"catalytic episodes." These episodes, he said, play "a disproportionate role in history" and "arise out of systemic crisis." theatlantic.com/international/…
In Oct. 2001, the US "made its case" for invading Afghanistan to NATO. Per one NATO official, the presentation "did not report any direct order from Mr. bin Laden, nor did [it] indicate that the Taliban knew about the attacks before they happened." nytimes.com/2001/10/03/int…
Another diplomat of a close US ally said there was "nothing particularly new or surprising" and that the briefing "was descriptive and narrative rather than forensic. There was no attempt to build a legal case." nytimes.com/2001/10/03/int…
Colin Powell said the case linking Bin Laden with 9/11 was based on "pretty good information" (pretty good!), admitting it was "not evidence in the form of a court case." He also suggested it didn't really matter anyway since al-Qaeda had already been indicted for other attacks.
Thread of celebrities and entertainers who have questioned the official 9/11 narrative.
Feel free to drop more examples below, ideally with link
ROSIE O'DONNELL: "[I]t’s the first time in history that fire has ever melted steel. I do believe that it defies physics that World Trade Center Tower 7...it is impossible for a building to fall the way it fell without explosives being involved." nytimes.com/2007/05/30/nyr…
MARK RUFFALO: "My first reaction was, 'buildings don't fall down like that.'...The fact that the 9/11 investigation went from the moment the planes hit to the moment the buildings fell...makes that investigation completely illegitimate." insider.com/conspiracy-the…
Thread of writers, intellectuals, journalists who have questioned the official 9/11 narrative.
Feel free to drop more examples below, ideally with link
GORE VIDAL: "Will the suspects please line up...The United States? Elements of corporate America would undeniably prosper from a 'massive external attack' that would make it possible for us to go to war whenever the President sees fit..." ratical.org/ratville/CAH/E…
PETER DALE SCOTT: "They were telling us right away who had done [9/11] without having an investigation…This is a crime but they're not investigating it as a crime. They've already solved the crime…it was very much like the JFK assassination." wewereliedtoabout911.com