Excellent thread from @mariamtokhi about access to primary health care for people in disadvantaged communities.

GPs working in disadvantaged and rural areas report that it is increasingly difficult to provide care for their patients. Worse since Covid.

My thoughts:
All Australians deserve to have access to quality GP services that provide the time and care that they need. Especially if they have complex health problems or mental health care concerns.
Even in areas that are not disadvantaged, providing GP services for the Medicare ‘bulk billing’ rate is very difficult. Funding does not cover the cost of providing the service, and over the years has not kept up with inflation or operating costs, eg nursing and admin staffing.
As a result, GPs often rely on ‘chronic disease’ item numbers which were designed to improve care but in effect are used to cross-subsidise the cost of GP consults. GPs have to think about item numbers and billing instead of just providing care to the patient in front of them.
There are inherent rewards in caring for disadvantaged communities and @mariamtokhi has described them beautifully. I take my hat off to Mariam and many colleagues who do this work.
But these rewards are not always enough.
GPs also have to consider their own circumstances and their families. GPs doing this work often feel exhausted and overwhelmed. Young newly trained GPs are not necessarily going to take this work on just because we want them to.
It’s difficult to have conversations in public about GP incomes and practice viability because it brings out the calls of ‘greedy GPs’. But when patients struggle to access GP services you have to ask why, and what can be done about it.
Currently the optimal amount of time for a GP to spend with a patient, from the income point of view, is 6 minutes. A GP who spend 18 minutes with each patient receives a third of the income of a GP who spends 6 minutes, if they bulk bill. (No wonder patients can feel rushed!)
Increasing Medicare rebates for patients having longer consults will help, because access to long consults is one way of improving care. Longer consults allow time to listen and address the issues properly. Why should GP income go down with the longer they spend with a patient?
I think there is a role for a salaried or hybrid model in some areas. This would help to maintain practice viability (eg in rural) and access. GPs currently spend 14% of their time on non-billable work (eg coordinating care). Funding this would help. www1.racgp.org.au/ajgp/2021/sept…
Multidisciplinary care is very important. General practice works best when we are part of a team, rather than just sitting in an office seeing one patient after another. I would also love participate in ‘GP ward rounds’ which I believe would improve the quality of care.
Finally, GPs and practices dealing with Covid patients need support and resources right now so that their patients get the care they need. I’m not an expert on what is needed but GPs on the ground need to be listened to.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Karen Magraith

Karen Magraith Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @KarenMagraith

19 Sep
Myth: Menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) increases the risk of coronary heart disease. ❤️❤️

The question of whether MHT causes or protects from heart disease has been a subject of debate.

Here’s my take. 🧵
1/10
Prior to menopause women are relatively protected from heart disease, and this is related to the role of estrogen.
The menopause transition is associated with an increase in risk of heart disease which has been shown to be separate from the effects of chronological aging. 2/10
Observational studies found a reduction in heart disease for women taking MHT.
There is RCT evidence that estrogen has beneficial effects on cardiovascular risk factors, such as lipids and glucose metabolism. It also has effects on blood vessel function. 3/10
Read 10 tweets
4 Jul
What prevents perimenopausal and menopausal people from accessing the health care they need?
Doctor education and gender bias are not the biggest factors (though they are v important and need to be improved).

Structural barriers to long consultations are most important. 1/8
Our Medicare system is set up to incentivise short consults for one simple problem. It penalises patients (and their doctors) for needing longer consults for more complex issues.
And it makes it harder to access longer consults, especially in rural or disadvantaged areas. 2/8
Medicare rebates for patients have not kept up with inflation. GPs are under pressure to increase throughput and find it increasingly difficult to offer longer appointments.
I know this may bring out the cries of ‘greedy GPs’, but stay with me. 3/8
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(