Thread by @KingMakerFT

@FOOL_NELSON has picked up on a likely connection between an allegation in the Sussmann indictment and two footnotes in the Horowitz report:

https://twitter.com/FOOL_NELSON/status/1438688018303496194

To elaborate, Horowitz describes a former FBI confidential source bringing the FBI a list of Trump associates and Alfa Bank connections in July 2016, which coincides with the timing of what the hard-at-work conspirators we’re doing to create the Trump/Alfa Bank communications

narrative. The main thrust of the indictment was that when he met with the FBI in September, Sussmann lied about who his clients were that were behind the narrative spinning effort. The Horowitz footnotes indicate that the CH told the FBI in July and August who was behind the

Trump-Alfa connection research- the DNC and an unnamed client. Here’s the kicker- in September, the same month that Sussmann concealed his clients who were promoting the Alfa Bank narrative, McCabe directed that the CH team cease talking to the CH, who had disclosed the clients.

To put a cap on this, many have rightly made to point that the FBI could not have been genuinely fooled that Sussmann’s client, the campaign or the DNC, were not involved behind the scenes in putting this narrative together. That suggests his lie that he wasn’t representing

anyone wasn’t material. But what if Durham presents evidence that while some in the FBI knew this was a political dirty trick, McCabe joined the conspiracy to cover that fact up, so that the investigation could proceed. That’s further proof of materiality- and the conspiracy.

The Horowitz footnote describing how McCabe instructed the team not to talk to the confidential source anymore has always been a mystery, at least to me. Is Durham about to connect the Alfa Bank narrative conspiracy together with an FBI CH conspiracy , tied up with a neat ribbon