A small thread on China Evergrande, its metioric rise and an imminent financial collapse 🧵 👇
2/
Evergrande is China's second-largest property developer with $110 billion in sales in 2020 alone. Evergrande was founded in 1996 by Chairman Hui Ka Yan in Guangzhou China 🇨🇳
The company was listed in Hong Kong in 2009, helping it grow its asset size to $355 billion today.
5/
Concerns intensified after Evergrande admitted in June it did not pay some commercial paper on time, and news in July a Chinese court froze a $20 million bank deposit held by the firm on the request of Guangfa Bank.
6/
Evergrande's demise came from accumulating massive amounts to debt to grow as quickly as possible.
Evergrande's fast expansion fueled by loans to support its land buying spree, and selling apartments quickly despite low margins so as to start the cycle again.
7/
Its total liability, which include payables, is at 1.97 trillion yuan ($306.3 billion), or around 2% of the Chinas GDP. Other than bank and bond channels, the developer has been tapping the shadow banking market, including trusts, wealth mgmt. products and commercial paper.
8/
Evergrande accelerated its debt-reduction efforts last year after regulators introduced caps on three debt ratios, dubbed the "three red lines" policy. It aims to meet all the requirements by the end of 2022.
9/
Evergrande gave buyers steep discounts for its residential developments & sold the bulk of its commercial properties. Since the second half of 2020, it has had a $555 million secondary share sale, raising $1.8 billion by listing its property management unit in Hong Kong.
10/
China's central bank highlighted in 2018 that companies including Evergrande might pose systemic risks to the nation's financial system. The leaked letter last year said Evergrande's liabilities involve more than 128 banks and over 121 non-banking institutions.
11/
JPMorgan estimated China Minsheng Bank has the highest exposure to Evergrande. Late payments could trigger cross-defaults as many financial institutions have exposure to Evergrande via loans and indirect holdings.
Almost Lehman Brothers style.
12/
In the dollar bond market, Evergrande accounts for 4% of Chinese real estate high-yields, according to DBS. Any defaults will also trigger sell-offs in the high-yield credit market.
A collapse will have a large impact on the job market.
13/
Evergrande has 200,000 staff and hires 3.8 million people every year for project developments.
Evergrande owns an office tower in Hong Kong's Wan Chai district. It has one completed and two nearly-completed residential developments in the city, & a vast undeveloped land.
16/
China's central bank said it summoned executives of the country's most indebted property developer, China Evergrande Group. It comes days after President Xi Jinping highlighted efforts to forestall major financial risks.
17/
Evergrande has more than 240 billion yuan ($37 billion) of bills & trade payables from contractors to settle over the next 12 months.
Concern over the developer's financial health intensified in June when it failed to pay some commercial paper on time.
18/
Its bonds carry junk ratings from S&P, Moody's and Fitch, all of whom recently issued downgrades, and its troubles have sent jitters through China's entire junk-debt market at a time when corporate credit is rallying in the rest of the world.
19/
In the hearings, at least one bond investor said the move could mean Evergrande is on the verge of a default that would reverberate through the banking system.
Lehman Brothers anyone 🤔
20/
Buried under its crushing debt of about $300 billion, Evergrande is so huge that the fallout from any failure could hurt not just China’s economy. Contagion could spread to markets beyond China.
This collapse would be the biggest test of China’s financial system in years.
21/
Banks have responded to its deteriorating cash flow. Some in Hong Kong, including HSBC & Standard Chartered, have declined to extend new loans to buyers of two uncompleted Evergrande residential projects.
Ratings agencies downgraded the firm, citing its liquidity problems.
22/
Evergrande share price plunged nearly 80% so far this year, and trading of its bonds was repeatedly halted by Chinese stock exchanges in the past weeks.
23/
In an August report, S&P estimated that over the next 12 months, Evergrande will have over 240 billion yuan ($37.16 billion) of bills and trade payables from contractors to settle — around 100 billion yuan of that amount is due this year.
24/
A paint supplier to Evergrande, Shanghai-listed Skshu Paint, said in a filing that the real estate firm repaid part of its debt in properties – and uncompleted ones at that.
Who'd want to be paid in incomplete properties instead of cash.
😂😂😂😂
25/
Just in 2021 alone, Chinese billionaires lost so much money due to Evergrande, it's insane.
Colin Huang - $30 Billion
Zhong Shanshan - $18 Billion
Jay Y Lee - $16 Billion
Hui Ka Yan - $15 Billion
Pang Kang - $12 Billion
26/
On a lighter note, choose your disaster pick for 2021
Evergreen vs. Evergrande 😀
To understand the CCP intricacies of what’s going down with Evergrande, Check this out.
Chinese real estate market is the largest asset class of any kind in the world. It’s inflated and if it slides, then the contagion financial effects could be felt world wide to be honest 🤷♂️
A large Chinese shadow bank Zhongrong International Trust Co. missed payments on dozens of products and has no immediate plans to make their clients whole.
Chinese Real Estate bubble and the lack of demand for Chinese exports is a major cause for concern.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The statement that "more squirrels and raccoons have been arrested than Epstein clients" highlights a stark disparity between the enforcement of minor, even absurd, regulations and the apparent reluctance to pursue justice against powerful individuals implicated in Jeffrey Epstein’s criminal network. In late 2024, the case of Peanut the Squirrel and Fred the Raccoon captured public attention when New York’s Department of Environmental Conservation raided Mark Longo’s home, seizing and euthanizing these animals over claims of illegal possession and rabies risks. The operation involved multiple agents and hours of effort, showcasing a swift and decisive response to what many saw as a trivial violation. This incident, amplified by social media outrage, underscores how authorities can mobilize resources to "arrest" or address wildlife-related issues, even when the targets are harmless pets, while seemingly ignoring far graver human crimes.
In contrast, the Epstein case—despite overwhelming evidence of a sex trafficking operation involving influential figures—has seen remarkably little accountability for his clients. Epstein, a financier with ties to politicians, billionaires, and royalty, was arrested in 2019 and died in custody, officially ruled a suicide, though conspiracy theories abound. Court documents unsealed in recent years name numerous associates, yet few, if any, of these high-profile individuals have faced arrest or prosecution. The disparity fuels public frustration: while a squirrel’s fate can prompt a government raid, the powerful men who allegedly exploited minors alongside Epstein remain largely untouchable, shielded by wealth, status, or legal loopholes. This juxtaposition paints a compelling picture of a system that prioritizes the enforcement of petty rules over the pursuit of justice for heinous crimes, leaving society to question where true accountability lies.
The influence of corporate money in politics is a pervasive force that often shapes government inaction on issues like genetically modified organisms (GMOs). Companies like Bayer and Monsanto, with their deep pockets and extensive lobbying networks, have the resources to sway policymakers in their favor. They contribute millions to political campaigns, ensuring that elected officials remain sympathetic to their interests. This financial leverage creates a system where legislation or regulation that might harm these corporations’ bottom lines—such as banning or heavily restricting GMOs—is quietly sidelined. The revolving door between government agencies and corporate boardrooms only deepens this entanglement, as former industry executives often take regulatory roles, bringing their biases with them.
Beyond direct political influence, these corporations have mastered the art of shaping public perception through partnerships with universities and media outlets. By funding research at academic institutions, they can produce studies that downplay or dismiss health concerns related to GMOs, lending a veneer of scientific legitimacy to their products. These studies are then amplified by media campaigns, often subtly sponsored or influenced by the same corporations, to reassure the public that GMOs are safe and necessary for feeding a growing population. Dissenting voices—independent researchers or whistleblowers raising red flags about potential health risks—are drowned out or discredited, leaving regulators with a convenient excuse: the “science” isn’t conclusive enough to justify action.
Finally, the government’s inertia can be attributed to a broader economic calculus that prioritizes short-term gains over long-term public health. GMOs are deeply embedded in the agricultural industry, which contributes significantly to GDP and employs millions. Disrupting this system by cracking down on GMO foods would ripple through the economy, threatening jobs, trade relationships, and corporate profits—consequences no administration wants to face. Politicians, wary of being labeled as anti-business or anti-progress, opt for the path of least resistance, allowing these food giants to operate with minimal oversight. Meanwhile, any evidence of harm to human health is buried under bureaucratic delays or dismissed as anecdotal, preserving the status quo where profit trumps precaution.
In a society where ninety-nine are weak,
Catering to one percent, the woke mind virus we seek.
We bend, we twist, in endless contortions,
For those whose views demand our constant attention.
Enough is enough, we must stand and say,
No more to the norms that lead us astray.
We're lost in a maze of virtue so fake,
Where common sense and reason are hard to make.
Break the shackles of this modern-day plight,
Where speaking freely invites social fight.
We've tiptoed around, afraid to offend,
But now is the time to make our voices blend.
Let's reclaim the ground where logic once stood,
Where truth wasn't buried under virtue's wood.
We'll rise from the shadows, no longer confined,
To a world where the sane are not redefined.
Enough with the madness, the guilt, and the shame,
We'll break these chains in freedom's name.
For unity, not division, we'll strive,
In a society where all can truly thrive.