Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋 Profile picture
🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋
@DeepBlueCrypto
Truth, Liberty, Freedom, Rights, Memes, Humor, Peace matters more than ever in the world now. CBDCs are evil. Bitcoin is money. Blockchain & Crypto enthusiast.
13 subscribers
Nov 11 • 49 tweets • 14 min read
President Donald J. Trump's victory represents the greatest story of perseverance in human history, and he's just getting started!

A thread on politics & politicians👇 Here’s a prev thread on the same
Oct 29 • 16 tweets • 5 min read
It’s very dangerous to trust government going forward with your children’s health.

COVID disaster was the biggest crime against humanity ever committed by the governments in both size and scale.

Do what’s right for your children’s future, not what’s good for Big Pharma. Here’s a thread on harmful vaccines
Oct 21 • 41 tweets • 10 min read
ELON MUSK: "It's pretty wild that a tiny tax on tea started the revolution and now we get the living daylights taxed out of us and theres no revolution. You get taxed on what you earned, you get taxed on what you buy, and you get taxed on what you own. Taxes, taxes, taxes, and what does it get spent on? That's why we need to reduce the size of government."

A thread on taxation is theft 👇 Here’s a prev thread on the same
Oct 20 • 14 tweets • 5 min read
Elon Musk supports free speech

The blob bureaucracy doesn’t like this

They use every public agency to exact revenge on Elon Musk and his corporations to red tape the progress

If Kamala Harris wins, they will set an example with him for the future

A thread on Elon Musk👇 Here’s a prev thread
Oct 16 • 31 tweets • 10 min read
Donald Trump won the 2024 election already. All these campaigns, debates, press events, interviews are a distraction at this point.

The media doesn’t tell you this, but unless there’s a massive election fraud matching the levels of 2020, he’s won.

A 🧵
Here’s a prev thread on the same
Oct 11 • 70 tweets • 23 min read
America sure doesn’t want to be ruled by airheads, knuckleheads, chuckleheads and bone heads

🔥🔥The Tale of Four Heads 🔥🔥

Airhead floats with thoughts so light,
Dreaming in the broad daylight.
Lost in clouds, without a care,
Wanders here, then drifts elsewhere.

Bonehead’s dense, a stubborn sort,
Hard to crack, though full of naught.
Tried and tried to think things through,
But thinking’s not what boneheads do!

Chucklehead laughs loud and long,
Finds a joke in what’s all wrong.
Every mishap, every fall,
Is funny when you’re chuckle tall.

Knucklehead’s the one who fights,
Argues loud through days and nights.
Thinks with fists instead of brains,
Quick to anger, slow to gains.

Four heads wander through the town,
Causing grins and some a frown.
But together, day or night,
They keep life a little light!

A thread on corrupt politicians👇Image Here’s a prev thread on the same
Oct 6 • 15 tweets • 4 min read
Exotic travel destinations, natural beauty, architectural wonders are something most people enjoy

Switzerland 🇨🇭 is gods own country

A 🧵#12 on travel destinations 👇

Here’s a prev thread
Sep 23 • 7 tweets • 4 min read
Over the past 125 years, the U.S. government's approach to regulation has undergone significant transformations, reflecting changes.

Over-regulation and government expansion has become a significant issue these days. Some of the factors include:

đźš©Expansion of Regulatory Scope: Initially, regulations were primarily focused on economic activities like interstate commerce, banking, and transportation. Over time, this scope expanded dramatically to include environmental protection, consumer safety, health care, telecommunications, and more. This shift was partly due to the recognition of externalities and public goods that the market might not address efficiently.

đźš©Creation of Regulatory Agencies: The establishment of agencies like the Interstate Commerce Commission (1887), later followed by the Environmental Protection Agency (1970), and others, marked a trend towards specialized regulatory bodies. These agencies have grown in number and influence, with each often having a specific sector or issue to oversee.

đźš©Environmental and Social Regulations: The latter half of the 20th century saw a surge in regulations aimed at protecting the environment and public health, with landmark legislation like the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, and various amendments expanding federal authority into areas previously left to states or not regulated at all.

đźš©Technological Influence: The rise of technology has both necessitated new regulations (like internet privacy, cybersecurity) and influenced how regulations are implemented (e.g., through digital reporting, electronic rule-making platforms). This has also led to debates over net neutrality and data protection, showcasing the government's struggle to keep pace with technological change.

A thread on ever expanding governmentsImage Here’s a prev thread on the same
Sep 20 • 30 tweets • 8 min read
Ian Carroll's breakdown of the three tiers of conspiracy was absolutely brilliant.

“What is the Big Conspiracy?”

He lays it down easily with money, power and people and diving into those rabbit holes, with Dark agencies doing their dirty work.

A 🧵 on conspiracy theories 👇 Here’s a prev thread on the same
Sep 15 • 70 tweets • 20 min read
Listen to Senator Malcolm Roberts unleash absolute hell over the Global Covid Scam‼️

“People are waking - we are going to hound you down - the people that are guilty”

“It has been planned over decades”

A thread on big Pharma & vaccines👇 Here’s a prev thread on the same
Sep 9 • 25 tweets • 7 min read
Joe Rogan: "Before COVID I would have told you that vaccines are the most important invention in human history.

After Covid, I'm like, I don't think we went to the Moon and I think Pizzagate is real."

A thread on #ConspiracyTheories 👇

Here’s a prev thread on the same
Sep 1 • 64 tweets • 19 min read
ELON MUSK IS A CHAMPION OF FREE SPEECH THROUGH X AND THEY HATE ELON MUSK FOR IT BECAUSE THEY CANNOT CONTROL THE NARRATIVES

Elon Musk's acquisition and rebranding of Twitter to X has not only transformed the platform's identity but also its role in global discourse, particularly in how it challenges establishment narratives. Through X, Musk has positioned himself as a champion of free speech, often clashing with regulatory bodies, governments, and judicial systems over what he perceives as overreaches in controlling information. This stance has led to numerous conflicts, most notably with Brazilian Judge Alexandre de Moraes, highlighting Musk's commitment to allowing a broad spectrum of voices on the platform. This approach has made X a battleground for free speech, where Musk's decisions to reinstate previously banned accounts or resist content moderation requests are seen by some as defending the right to express diverse opinions, thereby exposing truths that might otherwise be suppressed by more conventional media or governmental controls.

The establishment's discomfort with X under Musk's leadership stems largely from this very commitment to unfettered speech. Musk's public feuds, like his labeling of Judge Moraes as dictatorial for attempting to regulate content on X, illustrate his broader critique of how power structures might use legal or regulatory frameworks to stifle dissent or alternative viewpoints. This dynamic has turned X into a platform where the establishment's narratives are frequently challenged, not just through policy but through the very content that users, encouraged by Musk's policies, are willing to post. This environment brings to light truths or perspectives that might be sidelined in more controlled media environments, thereby making X a unique arena for uncovering what might be considered hidden or inconvenient truths by those in power. Here’s a prev thread on the same
Aug 29 • 54 tweets • 16 min read
In 1913, the landscape of financial governance in the United States underwent a significant transformation with the passage of the Federal Reserve Act, which established the Federal Reserve System. Here's how this change potentially shifted power towards central banks from the people:

đźš©Creation of the Federal Reserve: The Federal Reserve Act created a central banking system in the U.S., which was a departure from the previous system where the U.S. had no formal central bank since the demise of the Second Bank of the United States in 1836. This new system was designed to address financial panics and provide a more elastic currency.

đźš©Monetary Policy Tools: The Federal Reserve was endowed with tools like the ability to set the discount rate, influence the federal funds rate, and conduct open market operations (buying and selling government securities). These tools gave the Fed significant control over the money supply, interest rates, and credit conditions, which directly affect economic activity.

đźš©Reduction in Direct Public Control: Before 1913, if the government needed funds beyond what it could raise through taxes or existing revenue, it had to issue bonds directly to the public. This process inherently required public approval or at least public investment in government debt. The creation of the Federal Reserve allowed for a more indirect mechanism where the central bank could create money or credit, which could then be lent to the government, potentially bypassing direct public scrutiny or investment.

đźš©Influence Over Economic Policy: The Federal Reserve's ability to influence economic conditions through monetary policy meant it could play a significant role in economic stability or instability, which indirectly affects political and public policy. This power could be seen as shifting influence from the public and elected officials to a more insulated body of bankers and economists.

đźš©Perception of Power Shift: This shift was seen as a transfer of power from the people and their elected representatives to a private banking elite. By controlling the money supply and credit, central banks like the Federal Reserve could influence government spending, economic cycles, and even geopolitical decisions, potentially without direct democratic accountability.

đźš©Long-term Economic Impact: Over time, this system has been criticized for contributing to inflation, as the central bank's ability to print money or create credit can lead to currency devaluation over time.

It’s a complete loss of control by the populace over monetary policy, suggesting that the centralization of financial power in 1913 with the Federal Reserve Act marked a significant shift where central banks gained more influence over economic and, by extension, political outcomes than the direct will of the people or their elected representatives.

A continued thread on Federal Reserve and the central banks 👇Image Here’s a prev thread on the same
Aug 26 • 28 tweets • 9 min read
Democrats saw this chart and they said they wanted this badly… NOW

The "Great Replacement Theory" in America — there's a deliberate effort by liberal elites and political groups to demographically alter the country, replacing the white population with non-white immigrants. This shift is orchestrated to change the political landscape, ensuring a voter base more aligned with leftist policies.

A thread on election fraud👇Image Here’s a previous thread on the same
Aug 26 • 34 tweets • 9 min read
The Clinton family, particularly Bill and Hillary Clinton, have been at the center of numerous corruption allegations throughout their political careers, with the Clinton Foundation often at the heart of these controversies. The foundation, established by Bill Clinton in 1997, has been criticized for its financial dealings, especially during Hillary Clinton's tenure as Secretary of State. Critics argue that the foundation's acceptance of donations from foreign governments and entities might have influenced U.S. policy decisions, suggesting a quid pro quo where donors gained access or favorable treatment in exchange for their contributions. This perception was fueled by investigations and reports, like those mentioned in the Durham report, which highlighted the FBI's interest in the foundation's activities, although these probes did not result in charges against the Clintons.

Moreover, the Clintons' involvement in various scandals, from Whitewater to Travelgate, has painted a picture of a family entangled in corruption. The Whitewater scandal involved allegations of fraudulent land deals, while Travelgate saw the controversial firing of the White House Travel Office staff, actions that critics argue were motivated by personal gain or retribution. These incidents, combined with the foundation's activities, have led to a narrative of systemic corruption within the Clinton family's operations, where personal enrichment and political influence are seen as intertwined. Despite investigations, the definitive proof of criminal wrongdoing directly linking the Clintons to these allegations has been elusive, yet the shadow of these controversies continues to influence public and political discourse around their legacy.

A thread on Clinton corruption 👇 Here’s a prev thread on the same
Aug 25 • 10 tweets • 7 min read
THIS WILL BE YOUR FUTURE SOON…

In the year 2035, the digital landscape had evolved into a meticulously controlled environment, where the boundaries of free speech were redefined by the newly established Meme Regulation Authority (MRA). This Orwellian entity was tasked with monitoring, censoring, and prosecuting any digital content deemed subversive or offensive under the guise of protecting societal harmony. A Canadian woman named Elise, an unassuming graphic designer with a penchant for satirical humor, found herself at the center of this storm. One evening, after posting a meme that cleverly critiqued the government's latest surveillance policy, her life took an unexpected turn. The meme, which depicted a dystopian version of Canada where citizens were monitored by drones, went viral overnight. However, its spread was cut short when the MRA flagged it for "undermining state stability." Before dawn, Elise was awakened not by her alarm but by the sound of her door being forcefully opened by agents of the MRA, who arrested her under the newly enacted Digital Expression Act.

Elise's trial became a spectacle, not just for its novelty but for the chilling effect it had on digital expression across the nation. The courtroom was a blend of old-world justice and new-world surveillance, with screens displaying real-time analysis of public sentiment towards the trial. Prosecutors argued that Elise's meme could incite rebellion, citing its potential to influence thoughtcrime—a term borrowed from Orwell's "1984" but now legally recognized. Her defense, limited by the very laws she was accused of violating, struggled to argue the value of satire in a free society. The judge, after a deliberation that seemed more like a formality, sentenced Elise to three years in a reeducation facility, where she would be "reintegrated" into society with a corrected understanding of humor and loyalty to the state. The case set a precedent, chilling the once vibrant meme culture of Canada, where every share, like, or comment was now weighed against the specter of the MRA's watchful eye.Image Here’s a prev meme thread on the same
Aug 24 • 36 tweets • 10 min read
The argument that "taxation is theft" hinges on several philosophical, ethical, and economic principles, often championed by libertarians, anarcho-capitalists, and some conservative thinkers. Here's a breakdown of why this perspective exists:

1. Property Rights: At its core, this argument revolves around the concept of property rights. Proponents assert that individuals have a natural right to the fruits of their labor. When the government imposes taxes, it forcibly takes away part of what an individual has earned or owns, which, in their view, is akin to theft because it's taken without the individual's explicit consent.

2. Non-Aggression Principle (NAP): Many who argue that taxation is theft adhere to the NAP, which states that initiating force, threat of force, or fraud against a person or their property is inherently wrong. Taxation, enforced by law with penalties for non-compliance, is seen as an initiation of force.

3. Lack of Consent: The argument often points out that while one might benefit from public services funded by taxes, there's no individual consent mechanism for taxation. You're born into a system where you must pay taxes, regardless of whether you agree with how they're used or how much is taken.

4. Moral Equivalence: Some draw a direct moral equivalence between a mugger taking your wallet and the government taking your money through taxes. Both, they argue, are taking something that belongs to you without your voluntary agreement.

5. Government Efficiency and Use of Funds: Critics often highlight that taxes aren't always used efficiently or in ways that benefit taxpayers directly or equally. They argue that if individuals were allowed to keep more of their earnings, they could decide where their money goes, potentially leading to more efficient or charitable use.

6. Historical and Philosophical Roots: Thinkers like Lysander Spooner have historically argued against taxation on these grounds, suggesting that governments, without the explicit consent of the governed, are essentially engaging in theft. This perspective ties into broader critiques of government legitimacy.

7. Economic Freedom: From an economic perspective, some argue that high taxation reduces economic freedom, potentially stifling innovation and economic growth by reducing the incentive to work, save, or invest.Image Here’s a prev thread on the same
Aug 15 • 11 tweets • 4 min read
Printing more money so everyone gets rich and can afford the same goods easily is a fool’s errand. Printing excess money causes inflation rising prices of most scarce assets.

A thread on inflation and its effects👇
Here’s a previous thread on the same
Aug 12 • 45 tweets • 11 min read
Julian Assange: “We are now approaching the state of Orwell's dictum, the perfect dictum that he who controls the present controls the past. He who controls Internet servers controls the intellectual record of mankind, and by controlling that, controls our perceptions of who we are and by controlling that, controls what laws and regulations we make in society.”

A thread on our Orwellian society👇 Here’s a prev thread on the same
Aug 5 • 42 tweets • 13 min read
Kamala Harris is the new democrat candidate replacing demented Joe Biden. She was a border czar in which she failed miserably. She’s an AI czar for which she wouldn’t even understand the implications. She’s bad for the economy, inflation, world peace, energy independence, education, crime rates, child trafficking, drug trafficking and everything else.

They don’t want Donald Trump elected because they’re afraid he will expose and dismantle them.

A thread 🧵 on corrupt politiciansImage Here’s a prev thread on the same
Jul 12 • 106 tweets • 29 min read
Joe Biden talks to dead people
Joe Biden thinks Zelensky is Putin
Joe Biden thinks Kamala is VP Trump

Joe Biden is more confused than the gynecologist of Michelle Obama

A meme thread on crooked politicians Prev thread 🧵 on the same