🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋 Profile picture
Truth, Liberty, Freedom, Rights, Memes, Humor, Peace matters more than ever in the world now. CBDCs are evil. Bitcoin is money. Blockchain & Crypto enthusiast.
14 subscribers
Feb 8 • 85 tweets • 24 min read
@DavidSacks blasts USAID for using American taxpayers to fund left-wing organizations and policies around the world.

"We're in debt almost $40 trillion, and the money is all laundered to them and their left crony entities and media orgs”

A 🧵 on DOGE👇

Here’s a prev thread
Feb 6 • 27 tweets • 8 min read
The acronym "DOGE" "Democrats Officially Getting Exposed." It is used to imply that the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), led by Elon Musk under the administration of President Donald Trump, is revealing or exposing alleged inefficiencies, fraud, and corruption supposedly linked to Democratic policies or government operations they've been in charge of or supported.

đźš©Fraudulent Activities Uncovered by DOGE:

1. Improper Payments at the Treasury Department:
- DOGE has claimed that payment approval officers at the Treasury Department were instructed to approve payments indiscriminately, even to known fraudulent or terrorist groups.

2. USAID Operations:
- DOGE has been involved in the shutdown of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), asserting that it is rife with fraud and waste. Specific claims include the agency funding projects like a DEI musical in Ireland and transgender opera in Colombia.

3. Access to Sensitive Government Systems:
- There are reports of DOGE gaining access to sensitive data, including Treasury payment systems, which could involve personal financial information of citizens.

4. Alleged Waste in Federal Spending:
- DOGE has announced savings, such as canceling over $1 billion in federal diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) contracts, suggesting these were wasteful or fraudulent expenditures.

5. General Claims of Fraud and Abuse:
- Broad assertions have been made by DOGE about uncovering "massive fraud, abuse, money laundering, and corruption" within government operations, though specifics beyond the above examples are less detailed in public reports.

A thread on @DOGE 👇Image Here’s a prev thread
Jan 30 • 50 tweets • 11 min read
Infographics are essential to convey information to people in the modern world.

A thread 🧵 #28 for your awareness👇 Image Here’s a prev thread
Jan 29 • 14 tweets • 5 min read
The global financial system is extraordinarily sensitive to the pronouncements of the Federal Reserve's chief due to the pivotal role the U.S. dollar plays in international trade and finance. As the world's reserve currency, fluctuations in U.S. monetary policy directly influence global liquidity, interest rates, and economic stability. When the Fed chair speaks, whether it's about interest rate decisions, inflation targets, or economic outlooks, markets around the globe adjust in anticipation or reaction. Investors, from Wall Street to the smallest foreign exchange traders, scrutinize every word for hints of policy shifts that could affect asset valuations, currency strength, and investment strategies. This reliance stems from the understanding that changes in U.S. policy can ripple through economies worldwide, affecting everything from commodity prices to international borrowing costs.

This dependency is further amplified by the psychological impact of the Fed's statements. The markets operate on a blend of hard data and human emotion, where confidence or uncertainty can sway economic directions significantly. The Federal Reserve's chief, therefore, not only sets the tone for economic policy but also manages market psychology. A mere suggestion of tightening or easing monetary policy can lead to immediate market movements, as traders and investors adjust their portfolios to hedge against perceived risks or capitalize on new opportunities. This dynamic creates a self-fulfilling prophecy where the Fed's words can shape economic reality by influencing investor behavior, credit availability, and consumer confidence, often before any actual policy changes are enacted.

Moreover, the absence of a truly global monetary authority makes the Federal Reserve's chair one of the most influential figures in international finance. Other central banks and governments watch closely, often aligning their policies to mitigate or leverage the effects of U.S. monetary decisions. This isn't merely about following the dollar; it's about navigating the complex web of global economic interdependence where the U.S. economy, due to its size and influence, acts as a linchpin. The Fed's communication strategy, thus, becomes a critical tool not just for domestic policy but for global financial stability. This concentration of influence underscores a system where one person's words can dictate the financial health and economic direction of nations far beyond U.S. borders, highlighting our world's reliance on the Federal Reserve chief's rhetoric.

A thread on federal reserve and central banks Here’s a prev thread on the same
Jan 12 • 26 tweets • 11 min read
This isn’t a conspiracy theory… but the truth

Here's why systems dominated by certain sectors might inherently fail to achieve broader societal goals:

đźš©A Country Run by Banks Will Always Be in Debt:

- **Profit Over Stability:** Banks inherently aim to maximize profit, which often involves lending money and charging interest. This creates a cycle of perpetual debt for the state, as governments need to borrow to fund operations, infrastructure, and crises. The more debt there is, the more interest accumulates, ensuring that the debt never truly diminishes.

- **Economic Dependency:** By controlling financial policies, banks can dictate economic conditions that favor debt accumulation, like low interest rates that encourage borrowing or high inflation rates that devalue currency, increasing the nominal value of debt.

đźš©Healthcare Run by Big Pharma Will Never Cure Disease:

- **Financial Incentives:** Curing diseases is less profitable than managing chronic conditions. Big Pharma benefits from long-term treatments where patients need continuous medication, rather than one-time cures which would eliminate future revenue from that ailment.

- **Research Focus:** The pharmaceutical industry's R&D is heavily influenced by potential market size and profitability rather than public health needs, often sidelining research into cures for less common or less profitable diseases.

- **Regulatory Influence:** Through lobbying, big pharma can influence regulations and drug approval processes to favor treatments that don't eradicate diseases but manage symptoms, thus ensuring sustained sales.

đźš©A State Run by War Will Never Know Peace:

- **Perpetual Conflict:** Military-industrial complexes thrive on conflict. Wars justify defense budgets, contracts, and arms sales. Peace reduces these opportunities, hence there's an institutional bias towards maintaining some level of tension or conflict.

- **Political Power:** Military leaders or regimes often gain and retain power through war, making peace less appealing as it might lead to a reduction in their control or influence.

- **Economic Dependency:** Economies can become dependent on war industries for jobs and innovation, creating a cycle where peace is economically destabilizing.

đźš©A Nation Run by Media Will Never Know the Truth:

- **Profit from Sensationalism:** Media outlets often prioritize sensational, controversial, or divisive content to attract viewership, which can distort facts or omit context for the sake of engagement.

- **Control Over Information:** Media conglomerates can influence public opinion by controlling what information is disseminated, how it's framed, or even by suppressing stories that don't align with their interests or those of their sponsors.

- **Bias and Agenda Setting:** Whether through political alignment, ownership biases, or advertiser influence, media can skew narratives away from objective truth towards narratives that benefit their agendas or maintain viewer loyalty.

In each case, the systemic incentives and structures prioritize outcomes that align with the dominant institution's interests rather than the public good or societal well-being.Image Here’s a previous thread on conspiracy theories
Jan 7 • 63 tweets • 18 min read
The issue of Muslim grooming gangs in Britain involves groups of men, primarily of Pakistani heritage, who were involved in the systematic sexual exploitation of young, mostly white, girls. These crimes took place over several decades, particularly highlighted in towns like Rotherham, Rochdale, and Telford.

**Nature of the Crimes:**
These gangs would typically target vulnerable young girls, often from disadvantaged backgrounds, using methods such as providing gifts, alcohol, or drugs to manipulate and control them. The abuse included rape, trafficking, and other forms of sexual exploitation, often occurring in a group setting where girls were passed among multiple men for abuse.

**Scale of Impact:**
While exact numbers are difficult to ascertain due to the scale and historical nature of these crimes, various reports suggest:

- In Rotherham alone, an independent inquiry estimated around 1,400 children were sexually exploited between 1997 and 2013. However, some sources suggest that the total number of victims across the UK could reach into the tens of thousands over the span of decades.
- In Telford, one investigation suggested that over 1,000 girls could have been affected over several decades.

**Cover-up Allegations:**
The allegations of cover-ups primarily involve:

- **Police**: Concerns have been raised that the police were reluctant to act due to fears of being perceived as racist or stirring up racial tensions. This hesitation led to insufficient action, with some victims' complaints being dismissed or not taken seriously. There were instances where police officers reportedly did not pursue leads or investigations because they were concerned about community relations or accusations of racial profiling.

- **Labour Party Politicians**: Critics argue that Labour politicians, particularly in areas with significant minority populations, were aware of these crimes but prioritized community cohesion and electoral considerations over addressing the abuse. There have been accusations that local councils, often led by Labour, downplayed or ignored the ethnic dimension of these crimes to avoid accusations of racism, thereby failing the victims.

- **Silence and Inaction**: The term "political correctness" has often been cited as a reason for the silence, where fear of backlash for highlighting the ethnicity of the perpetrators led to systemic failures. This included not only inaction but also in some cases, active suppression of information or downplaying the severity of the incidents.

**Public and Political Response:**
The issue has become politically charged, with debates over the extent to which ethnicity played a role in both the crimes and the cover-up. There has been criticism from various political quarters about the handling of these cases, with calls for more accountability, better policing strategies, and cultural changes within communities to address such issues.

The response from both police and political figures has evolved over time, with more recent commitments to tackle these issues head-on, including the establishment of task forces to investigate grooming gangs. However, the historical mishandling remains a point of contention and has been used in political discourse to critique the approach of past administrations and local governance.Image Here’s a previous thread on the same
Jan 4 • 93 tweets • 23 min read
Predators and individuals with harmful intentions often advocate for sex education, particularly when it involves young children, as a means to normalize sexual discussions and behaviors that can be exploited. They understand that by introducing these topics in an educational or seemingly benign context, they can desensitize children to sexual content and conversations. This normalization can make children less likely to recognize when they are being groomed or manipulated, as the boundaries between appropriate and inappropriate discussions become blurred. By advocating for early and explicit sex education, these individuals aim to create an environment where their predatory behaviors are less likely to be questioned or seen as abnormal, thereby making it easier to manipulate their victims.

Another reason predators push for teaching about sex to children is to exploit their natural curiosity and naivety. Children, especially those in their developmental stages, are naturally inquisitive about their bodies and sexuality. Predators can use this curiosity to engage children in conversations or activities that seem educational but are designed to groom them. They might introduce age-inappropriate material under the guise of education, which can lead to the child feeling complicit or even curious rather than alarmed. This tactic is particularly insidious because it leverages the trust children might have in authority figures or educational settings, making them more susceptible to manipulation. The grooming process often starts with seemingly harmless interactions, gradually escalating to more overt sexual content or requests.

Finally, by promoting sex education, predators aim to undermine the protective measures that might be taught by parents or guardians. Comprehensive sex education, when taught responsibly, includes lessons on consent, personal boundaries, and the right to privacy, which are crucial for a child's safety. However, predators seek to alter or dilute these teachings by introducing topics in ways that suit their agenda. For instance, they might encourage secrecy or make children feel like they are part of an exclusive, adult-like conversation, which can isolate them from protective adults. This manipulation can lead to children not reporting inappropriate behavior, as they might feel they are doing something 'grown-up' or that they might get in trouble for participating in what they've been taught. Thus, the promotion of such education by predators is not about enlightenment but about creating pathways for abuse.

A thread on #WokeMindVirus👇Image Here’s a prev thread on the same
Jan 2 • 90 tweets • 24 min read
Britain is rapidly descending into an Orwellian hell for its citizens and residents. Here are a few reasons why…

1. Population Pressure and Resource Strain: The influx of a significant number of immigrants, both legal and illegal, has put considerable pressure on public resources and infrastructure. This strain can lead to increased crime rates as competition for jobs, housing, and social services intensifies, potentially fostering environments where crime, including violent crimes like rape, becomes more prevalent due to economic desperation or social friction.

2. Criminal Exploitation of Immigration Channels: Organized crime groups have capitalized on the complexities of immigration laws and the movement of people, using these channels to smuggle individuals into the country for exploitative purposes. This includes human trafficking, forced labor, and prostitution, which not only contribute to crime but also directly involve illegal immigrants, often as both victims and perpetrators, thereby overwhelming the system with additional criminal activities.

3. Breakdown in Community Integration: The rapid demographic changes in some areas due to immigration have sometimes led to challenges in cultural integration, creating social tensions or even hostility. This can manifest in increased local crime rates as communities struggle to adapt, leading to scenarios where crime, including sexual offenses, might increase due to misunderstandings, prejudices, or outright criminal behavior from both sides of the cultural divide.

4. Law Enforcement Prioritization: The police have increasingly focused on combating crime facilitated by digital platforms, where activities like hate speech, cyberbullying, and the organization of physical crimes occur. This focus might stem from the need to address new forms of crime that have arisen with digitalization but can also mean a reallocation of resources away from traditional crime-fighting, potentially leading to a perception that common crimes like rape or local gang activities are not being addressed with sufficient vigor.

These reasons collectively suggest a multifaceted issue where immigration, crime, and law enforcement strategies intersect, contributing to the complex scenario of crime and social unrest in Britain.Image Here’s a prev thread on the same
Dec 25, 2024 • 56 tweets • 14 min read
Infographics are essential to convey information to people in the modern world.

A thread 🧵 #25 for your awareness👇 Image Here’s a prev thread
Dec 15, 2024 • 28 tweets • 8 min read
Federal Reserve Act made it possible for taxation without representation and endless wars possible.

Federal Reserve is the biggest Ponzi scheme known to mankind and it’s still being operated like one.

A thread on central banks & the Fed👇

Here’s a prev thread on the same
Dec 14, 2024 • 14 tweets • 5 min read
Here are 10 arguments proving that climate change is a giant hoax to perpetuate the climate spending from innocent taxpayers:

1. Historical Climate Variability: Climate has always changed naturally over time, citing periods like the Medieval Warm Period or the Little Ice Age as evidence that current changes are within historical norms, not caused by human activity.

2. Inaccuracies in Climate Models: Climate models have failed to predict certain trends or events accurately, suggesting that these models might exaggerate the impact of CO2 or other greenhouse gases.

3. Urban Heat Island Effect: Temperature increases recorded in urban areas are due to more concrete and less vegetation, not global warming, thus skewing global temperature data.

4. Benefits of CO2: There's an argument that CO2 is beneficial for plant growth, essentially acting as plant food, which could lead to greener Earth and higher crop yields, countering negative effects.

5. Economic Motive for Climate Tax: The suggestion here is that the push for climate change action is more about creating a new tax revenue stream for governments rather than environmental protection. This tax, they claim, would disproportionately affect the poor and small businesses.

6. Manipulation of Data: Climate data has been manipulated or selectively reported to fit a narrative, like the "Climategate" controversy where emails suggested scientists might have withheld data or adjusted it to support their conclusions.

7. Natural Solar Cycles: Changes in solar activity, like sunspots or solar cycles, correlate more closely with Earth's temperature changes than CO2 levels do, suggesting solar influence over human influence.

8. Lack of Consensus: There's significant disagreement within the scientific community about the extent and cause of climate change.

9. Previous Doomsday Predictions: most of the past environmental predictions about population growth, resource depletion, or pollution that didn't materialize as predicted, suggesting current climate predictions might also be exaggerated or wrong.

10. Geopolitical Control: Climate change fears are used by global elites or organizations like the IMF, UN, WEF and WHO to push for more centralized control over national policies, economies, and personal behaviors through mechanisms like carbon credits or emission treaties.

A thread on Climate Change 👇Image Here’s a prev thread on the same
Dec 12, 2024 • 69 tweets • 19 min read
Governments have made endless wars possible through Fiat money inflation. With nothing backing the money they print, all they need is lies and propaganda to start more wars and print more money to fix that’s destroyed.

It’s a never ending cycle…. Unless we stop it.

Argument for Taxation Enabling War:

1. Funding Mechanism: Taxation provides governments with the necessary funds to finance military operations. Without a steady income from taxes, nations would struggle to maintain standing armies, develop military technology, or sustain prolonged conflicts. Historical examples, like the British taxation of the American colonies to fund imperial wars, illustrate how tax revenues directly fuel military capabilities. The ability to tax gives states the financial muscle to engage in warfare, thereby making war not just possible but also more extensive and prolonged than it might otherwise be.

2. Public Support and Legitimacy: Taxation also serves as a tool for garnering public support or at least compliance for war efforts. When citizens pay taxes, they are indirectly invested in the state's ventures, including military actions. This financial contribution can be spun into a narrative of shared national interest or defense, legitimizing the war in the eyes of the populace. For instance, during wartime, governments might increase taxes or introduce war bonds, linking the financial burden directly to the war effort, thereby fostering a sense of collective responsibility and urgency.

Argument for War Leading to Increased Taxation:

1. Economic Strain and Recovery: Wars are immensely costly, draining national resources and often leading to economic downturns. Post-war recovery, rebuilding infrastructure, and providing for veterans require significant funds, which governments then seek through increased taxation. The aftermath of World War II, where many countries raised taxes to rebuild, exemplifies this cycle. War thus sets a precedent for higher future taxation to address the economic fallout from military conflict.

2. Military-Industrial Complex: War stimulates the military-industrial complex, creating a demand for continuous military spending. This spending, in turn, necessitates higher taxes to support an ever-growing defense budget. The cycle of war leading to more war can perpetuate a need for increased taxation to fund new military endeavors, technological advancements, and the maintenance of military bases worldwide. This was evident during the Cold War, where the arms race between superpowers led to significant tax increases to support military spending.

Both arguments highlight a symbiotic relationship where taxation and war feed into each other, creating a cycle of financial and military escalation.

A thread on corrupt governments👇Image Here’s a prev thread on the same
Dec 11, 2024 • 54 tweets • 14 min read
THERE IS NO MONEY IN HEALTHY PEOPLE

THERE IS NO MONEY IN DEAD PEOPLE

THERE IS MONEY RIGHT IN THE MIDDLE

A thread on corruption in big pharma, vaccine side effects and the medical industry👇 Image Here’s a prev thread on the same
Nov 27, 2024 • 25 tweets • 8 min read
Childhood Vaccines
1983 = 10 vaccines
2013 = 32 vaccines
2022 = 74 vaccines

Autism Rates
1983 = 1 in 10,000
2013 = 1 in 88
2022 = 1 in 36
2025… estimates 1 in 2

A meme thread on vaccines and how the big pharmaceutical and the medical cartels have taken America hostage👇 Image From a prev thread on the same
Nov 26, 2024 • 57 tweets • 15 min read
Here is a comprehensive list of various taxes that individuals, businesses, and entities might encounter in the United States:

đźš©đźš©Federal Taxes:

1. **Individual Income Tax** - Levied on personal income, including wages, salary, investments, and other income sources.
- **Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)** - Ensures that individuals and corporations with high incomes pay at least a minimum amount of tax.

2. **Corporate Income Tax** - Taxed on corporate profits.

3. **Payroll Taxes:**
- **Social Security Tax** - Funds Social Security benefits.
- **Medicare Tax** - Funds Medicare health programs.
- **Federal Unemployment Tax (FUTA)** - Helps fund unemployment benefits.

4. **Capital Gains Tax** - Tax on the profit from the sale of assets like stocks, bonds, or real estate.

5. **Estate Tax** - Tax on the transfer of the estate of a deceased person.

6. **Gift Tax** - Tax on transfers of money or property when a person does not receive something of at least equal value in return.

7. **Excise Taxes** - Specific taxes on certain goods or activities like gasoline, alcohol, tobacco, and airline tickets.

8. **Customs Duties** - Tariffs on imported goods.

9. **Self-Employment Tax** - Similar to social security and Medicare taxes but for self-employed individuals.

đźš©đźš©State and Local Taxes:

1. **State Income Tax** - Many states levy income taxes on individuals and corporations. Rates vary by state, some have flat rates, while others have progressive brackets.

2. **Sales Tax** - A tax on retail purchases, varies by state and sometimes by locality within states.

3. **Property Tax** - Assessed on real estate, personal property, and sometimes intangible property like stocks.

4. **Local Income Taxes** - Some cities or counties impose their own income taxes.

5. **Excise Taxes** - States and some local governments might also have their own excise taxes, e.g., on gasoline, alcohol, and tobacco.

6. **Use Tax** - Charged when sales tax has not been paid on taxable items used, stored, or consumed within a state.

7. **Franchise Tax** - A tax imposed on businesses, often based on the net worth or capital stock of the business.

8. **Occupation Tax** - Tax on certain professions or occupations.

9. **Severance Tax** - Tax on the extraction of nonrenewable natural resources like oil, gas, and minerals.

10. **Hotel Occupancy Tax** - A tax on hotel room charges.

11. **Vehicle Registration Fees** - While not always considered a tax, these fees contribute to state revenues.

12. **Toll Taxes** - For the use of toll roads or bridges.

đźš©đźš©Other Taxes and Fees:

- **Biodiesel Fuel Taxes**
- **Building Permit Taxes**
- **Business Registration Fees**
- **Court Fines** - Can be considered a form of tax revenue for governments.
- **Disposal Fees** - For waste management or recycling.
- **Dog License Taxes**
- **Drivers License Fees**
- **Employer Health Insurance Mandate Tax** - Under certain conditions, like the Affordable Care Act's employer mandate.
- **Hunting and Fishing Licenses** - Fees can be considered taxes on those activities.
- **Inheritance Tax** - Some states tax the inheritance received by heirs.
- **Luxury Tax** - On high-value items like expensive cars or yachts.
- **Marriage License Fees**
- **Parking Tickets** - While punitive, they contribute to municipal revenue.
- **Real Estate Transfer Tax** - Paid when property deeds change hands.
- **Rental Car Tax**
- **Road Usage Tax** - Sometimes charged for electric or hybrid vehicles in lieu of gas tax.
- **School District Property Tax**
- **Telecommunications Tax** - On phone services.
- **Tire Disposal Fees**
- **Tourist Development Taxes** - Often related to accommodations to fund tourism promotion.

This list isn't exhaustive as new taxes can be introduced or modified at anytime.

A dreaded meme thread on taxes👇Image Here’s a prev thread on the same
Nov 25, 2024 • 27 tweets • 8 min read
Infographics are essential to convey information to people in the modern world.

“Stop supporting the military industrial complex”

A thread 🧵 #22 for your awareness👇 Image Here’s a prev thread on the same
Nov 24, 2024 • 79 tweets • 23 min read
Legacy Media often twists or hides the truth to fit the narratives of the establishment or their corporate sponsors and owners

Two compelling arguments by which they spread disinformation and propaganda are…

đźš©đźš©Selective Reporting & Framing

The media often engages in selective reporting and framing to align with establishment narratives, manipulating public perception by:

🎯 Omission of Facts: Media outlets might choose to omit or downplay information that does not fit the narrative. For instance, during political campaigns, stories that could negatively impact a favored candidate might be under-reported or buried in less visible sections of news coverage. This selective coverage ensures that the audience is only presented with a version of the story that supports the establishment's viewpoint.

🎯 Framing the Narrative: The way stories are framed can dramatically alter their interpretation. By choosing certain images, headlines, or angles, media can emphasize aspects that support the establishment's position while ignoring others. An example is the portrayal of economic policies where positive outcomes might be highlighted for one administration, whereas similar actions by another might be criticized, based on political alignment rather than objective analysis.

🎯 Use of Experts: Media often uses experts or pundits who are known to align with establishment views, thereby creating an echo chamber where only one side of an argument is given weight. This selective use of experts can skew public understanding by presenting a one-sided narrative, especially on complex issues like economic policy or international relations, where nuanced debate is necessary.

🎯 Context Stripping: Presenting events without their full context can mislead the audience. For instance, reporting on protests might focus solely on instances of violence without explaining the underlying causes or peaceful aspects, thus framing the event in a light that supports law enforcement or government action over the protesters' grievances.

The result is a public discourse that is heavily influenced by what the establishment deems important or beneficial, often at the expense of a more balanced or truthful representation of events.

đźš©đźš©Sensationalism & Agenda Setting

Media outlets sometimes twist truth through sensationalism and agenda-setting practices, which include:

🎯 Sensational Headlines: To capture attention, media might use sensational or misleading headlines that do not accurately reflect the content of the article. This practice can lead readers to form opinions based on headlines alone, which are often crafted to support narratives favored by the establishment or to generate more clicks and views for profit.

🎯 Amplification of Minor Events: By focusing disproportionately on minor events that align with a particular narrative, media can inflate their significance. This might involve over-covering stories that fit into pre-existing political or social narratives, thereby distracting from more substantial issues or giving undue weight to incidents that serve political ends.

🎯 Manufacturing Crises: Both media and government can benefit from crises, real or perceived. Media sometimes exaggerate or create a sense of urgency around issues that might not be as critical or immediate as portrayed. This tactic can be used to push policy agendas or to rally public support behind establishment figures or parties, particularly during elections or when legislation is at stake.

🎯 Echo Chamber Effect: By predominantly covering stories that confirm the biases of their audience, media outlets can reinforce rather than challenge public opinion, aligning with establishment narratives. This selective reporting creates an environment where alternative viewpoints are seldom aired, thus bending the truth to fit an agenda.

These practices not only shape public perception but can also influence political and social outcomes.

A meme 🧵 on biased corrupt media👇Image A previous thread on the same
Nov 17, 2024 • 93 tweets • 24 min read
The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), led by Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, aims to identify and reduce wasteful government spending through several proposed methods:

1. Eliminating Overlapping Regulations: DOGE will target areas where there might be regulatory overlap, such as between the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), potentially streamlining these functions to reduce redundancy.

2. Cutting Bureaucracy: Musk and Ramaswamy have expressed intentions to "dismantle government bureaucracy." This could involve reducing the number of federal agencies or downsizing their operations, as Musk has mentioned reducing the number of agencies from over 400 to 99.

3. Focusing on Expired Programs: There's a plan to defund programs whose authorizations have expired but still receive appropriations. This approach targets what is perceived as unnecessary or outdated spending.

4. Transparency and Public Involvement: Musk has pledged "maximum transparency" for DOGE's operations, which includes soliciting public suggestions for where cuts could be made, aiming to involve citizens directly in identifying wasteful spending.

5. Technological Innovation: Given Musk's background, there's an expectation that technological solutions like automation and artificial intelligence might be applied to enhance efficiency in government operations, potentially reducing administrative costs.

6. Restructuring Federal Agencies: The goal includes restructuring federal agencies to be leaner, which could involve merging departments, reducing staff, or changing how services are delivered to be more cost-effective.

However, the feasibility of achieving these cuts, especially to the tune of $2 trillion annually as Musk suggested, faces significant challenges:

- Congressional Approval: While DOGE operates as an advisory body outside of formal government structure, any real spending cuts or changes in agency structure would require Congressional approval, which could limit the scope of reforms due to political dynamics.

- Mandatory vs. Discretionary Spending: A large portion of the federal budget is mandatory spending (like Social Security and Medicare), which is harder to cut without legislative changes.

- Impact on Services: Critics argue that such drastic cuts could severely impact public services, potentially leading to increased hardship for many Americans, as noted in various analyses.

The initiative's success will depend heavily on how these strategies are implemented, the political support it garners, and whether it can balance efficiency gains with maintaining essential services for citizens.

A thread on wasteful and big governments👇 Here’s a prev thread on big governments
Nov 16, 2024 • 39 tweets • 13 min read
The term "Military-Industrial Complex" (MIC) was popularized by President Dwight D. Eisenhower in his farewell address in 1961. Here's an explanation of what it entails and how it functions:

### Definition:

The Military-Industrial Complex refers to the relationship between a nation's military, its government defense establishment, and private industry involved in producing arms, military technology, and other defense-related products. This complex has evolved to include think tanks, universities, and other institutions that also contribute to or benefit from defense policy and spending.

### Components:

1. **Government (Military and Defense Departments):**
- The government sets defense policy, determines military needs, and allocates budgets. In the U.S., this primarily involves the Department of Defense (DoD), but also other agencies like the Department of Homeland Security, the CIA, and others involved in national security.

2. **Defense Contractors:**
- These are private companies that design, produce, and sell military hardware, software, and services. Examples include Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Raytheon, and many others. These companies depend on government contracts for a significant portion of their revenue.

3. **Congress:**
- Members of Congress influence defense spending through their ability to authorize and appropriate funds. Defense spending can be a significant economic driver for districts with military bases or defense manufacturing facilities, leading to what's often called "pork barrel" projects.

4. **Think Tanks and Lobbying Groups:**
- These organizations often receive funding from defense companies and advocate for policies that would increase defense spending or favor specific military technologies or strategies.

### How It Works:

- **Budget Cycle:**
- Defense spending is part of the federal budget, which Congress must approve. Lobbying efforts by defense contractors, military leaders, and related interest groups can influence these budgetary decisions.

- **Revolving Door:**
- There's a notable "revolving door" phenomenon where individuals move between positions in the military, defense companies, and government. This can lead to policies that benefit former or future employers due to personal relationships or future career prospects in the defense industry.

- **Research and Development:**
- Significant R&D in military technology is often funded by the government, sometimes through contracts that promise future purchases if the technology proves viable. This intertwines the interests of the military with those of the companies developing these technologies.

- **Economic Impact:**
- Defense spending can significantly impact local economies, especially in areas with defense installations or manufacturing plants. This economic dependency can lead to political support for continued or increased military expenditure.

- **Lack of Accountability:** The complexity and secrecy often associated with defense projects can lead to less accountability regarding costs, effectiveness, and ethical considerations.

- **War as Business:** There's a concern that wars or conflicts might be prolonged or initiated for economic benefits to the defense industry.

- **Influence on Foreign Policy:** The MIC might push for policies that secure markets for defense products, potentially affecting diplomatic relations and international peace.

In essence, while the Military-Industrial Complex has been pivotal in maintaining military readiness and technological superiority, it also poses challenges regarding governance, transparency, and the ethical distribution of public resources. Its operation reflects a deep integration between economic interests, national security, and political power, with significant implications for both domestic policy and international relations.Image Here’s a prev thread
Nov 11, 2024 • 49 tweets • 14 min read
President Donald J. Trump's victory represents the greatest story of perseverance in human history, and he's just getting started!

A thread on politics & politicians👇 Here’s a prev thread on the same
Nov 9, 2024 • 56 tweets • 15 min read
Donald Trump: “Without free speech, we don’t have a free country. The first amendment has to be sacred and preserved for all Americans. We must put an end to the censorship industrial complex immediately.”

Free speech is foundational to the concept of freedom within a democratic society. It serves as the bedrock of open discourse, allowing for the exchange of ideas, criticism of government, and the ability for individuals to express themselves without fear of retribution. When citizens are free to speak their minds, it fosters an environment where truth can emerge from the marketplace of ideas. This process is crucial for the self-correction of society, enabling progress in politics, science, culture, and more. Without it, governments and institutions might operate unchecked, leading to authoritarianism where power is maintained through control of information.

Moreover, free speech acts as a check against tyranny. History has shown that when speech is curtailed, it often leads to the suppression of other freedoms. A society that values free speech inherently supports the rights to assembly, press freedom, and personal autonomy. By safeguarding the right to voice dissent, question authority, and share diverse perspectives, free speech ensures that minority views can be heard, potentially influencing policy and societal norms. This inclusivity in dialogue prevents the stagnation of thought and culture, promoting a dynamic and adaptive society where change can occur through discussion rather than conflict or revolution.

A thread on governments👇 Here’s a previous thread on government