It’s been slightly over a month since BitDAO raised almost $400M via a public sale (Dutch auction) of its BIT token on MISO. Today, BIT trades at $16.5bn FDV.
Here’s a quick comparison between BIT and FTT which currently trades at $23bn FDV. 🧵1/x
Their value propositions are similar: the tokens benefits from some form of fee-sharing with a centralized exchange.
I chose to exclude BNB here because it’s tricky to isolate BNB’s value due to BSC vs its fee-sharing mechanism with Binance.
2/x
As part of the Bybit Pledge, 2.5bps of futures trading volume on Bybit goes to BitDAO's treasury. (50% of nominal fees on the exchange; maker/taker of -2.5bps/7.5bps)
3/x
This has been ongoing since 15th July 2021, about 63 days now (see bitdao.io/analytics/).
4/x
Similarly, FTT benefits from a buy-and-burn program by FTX. It can also be staked on the exchange for benefits such as fee discounts, airdrops, and access to IEOs.
5/x
Buy-and-burns come from 33% of FTX fees, 10% of net additions to the “backstop fund”, and 5% others.
Historical buy-and-burns can be found here: ftx.com/intl/ftt
6/x
Year-to-date, $145m has been spent to buy and burn 4.8M FTT tokens ($336m at today’s prices). FTX Is on track to buy-and-burn $208m FTT (annualized).
We can treat this as a “special dividend” to FTT holders, similar to share repurchases.
7/x
How much money has gone into BitDAO? For the past 63 days, Bybit contributed an average of $2.8m/day through a mix of 50% ETH, 25% USDT, and 25% USDC.
8/x
Because of ETH’s price gain, the average is closer to $3.3m/day. (To get a more accurate comparison of BIT and FTT I use USD values at the date of contribution.)
9/x
As far as exchange performance goes, both FTX and Bybit are pretty close. The difference between BIT’s and FTX’s cheapness/expensiveness comes from take rate.
10/x
If BIT traded at FTT’s FDV/earnings multiple, it would be worth $123bn (more than 7x today's prices).
11/x
What I find myself asking after seeing the difference in multiples is “why?”. One common reason for such differences in valuation multiples is growth rates. So that’s where I looked.
12/x
I found that the 4Q20 to 3Q21 compounding QoQ growth rates were 54% (Bybit) and 82% (FTX).
According to FTX's PEG multiple, BIT would be worth $82bn (~5x today’s prices).
13/x
Why isn't BIT worth that much then? Here are a few reasons I can think of:
1. Perhaps the market thinks the best is yet to come for FTX’s volumes so it's willing to pay a premium.
2. Perhaps the market's just fading BIT.
14/x
end.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/
Alchemix is a platform to create synthetic assets backed by yield
In simple terms, the borrower gives up yield on his assets to borrow a certain amount of money today (on Alchemix, you can borrow up to 50% of your collateral value)
2/
For example:
If I deposit 1000 DAI today, I can borrow up to 500 alUSD
At today's yields, ~38.5% APY coming from
- Yearn yDAI Vault: 10.9% APY
- Boosted Alchemix Yield: 27.6% APY
Summary: mint & Burn DAI in exchange for aDAI to stay within the Target Max Variable borrow rate of DAI in Aave Liquidity Pools
Benefits to Aave:
- More DAI for Aave borrowers (yay!)
- Lower borrow rates for Aave users
- Partnership with dominant decentralized stablecoin protocol
Given stablecoins pools are the most utilized pools on borrow/lend platforms, this will help Aave compete with Compound!
Benefits to Maker:
- Generate cash flows from interest earned on Aave
- DAI gains natural access to any L2/chains that Aave expands into
In short, it is a proposal which lays out a new way users bid for blockspace in Ethereum.
A summary 👇
1/
For those new to crypto, like me, EIP-1559 stands for "Ethereum Improvement Proposal #1559"
2/
Benefits of EIP-1559: 1. Better UX by making fee estimation easier 2. Elastic block size, with limit on long-term average block size 3. Better security 4. Ensures $ETH preserves its monetary premium