An engineering question I like to ask people is: What are the ultimate sources of the power we the human race use? (thread)
The challenge is both to understand the second law of thermodynamics ('gravity' is not a source of energy) and to get all of them. The last one is a doozy. See if you can name them all before reading on.
Chemical stores of energy are relatively small and need to be replenished or they get used up quickly, which is in the process of happening. They mostly occur in the form of Carbon which isn't fully oxidized.
The obvious one is solar, which ultimately comes from fusion in the core of the Sun, which is a mix of the P-P chain and the CNO cycle, fusing Hydrogen using Carbon as a catalyst
Next up is nuclear power here on Earth, in the form of isotopes which have remaining potential energy. This powers geothermal from the decay of Uranium, Thorium, and Potassium, and human-caused fission from Uranium and hopefully a lot more in the future Thorium
In the future we might see human made fusion in the form of fusing Hydrogen (both Protium and Deuterium) and there's a bit of extra juice from decay of stable isotopes after a neutron from one of the above reactions hits them and they decay
Technically nuclear also gets a bit of juice from cosmic rays causing transmutation but thats too small to matter much to us humans, although now I wonder if a big enough planet could stay warm off of it
Now we get into the not obvious ones, which are tidal forces, caused by potential kinetic energy on a massive scale. The first of those is the difference between the length of a day and the length of a year.
The second is the difference between the length of a day and the length of a month. These directly cause the tides. Wind is caused by a combination of solar and tidal forces.
How much each contributes is a very interesting question. But we've left something out, something which is normally completely inaccessible but has most definitely been used one amazing way. What is it?
The final source of power is: The difference between the length of an Earth year and the length of a Jupiter year. If you want to get something of any size out of the solar system there's no way to do it except to slingshot off Jupiter \
thereby bringing the two planets a miniscule amount closer together. Thanks Jupiter!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bram Cohen

Bram Cohen Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @bramcohen

11 Sep
A/V sync and latency issues are as usual driving me insane. There's an opening for an amazing mobile app to be rewritten for dealing with this which apparently doesn't exist yet, here's how it would work: (thread)
The app has three modes: tick, tock, and calibrate. When it's in tick mode once a second it flashes a specific color light on its screen and makes a ticking sound. The tick sound should be high pitched and should be specific and the color should \
be a specific one. The details of what's best for those will be up to you, the engineer writing this thing. In the tock mode it has the camera on and waits for ticks to happen. When it hears and possibly sees a tick it calculates the offset between the light and sound for \
Read 8 tweets
6 Sep
Now a few highly speculative thoughts on better ways of getting things into space (thread)
The most important thing to understand about getting things into space is the role of the atmosphere. It both slows things down with air resistance and provides propellant which can be conveniently grabbed onto and flung backwards
As it happens, Earth's atmosphere is designed exactly wrong for space launches. It's so thick at the surface that hitting escape velocity will melt anything before it gets out, and becomes thin so fast that you can't use it to get any significant height
Read 20 tweets
3 Sep
Why is the unit of specific impulse in seconds, and how does it wind up being proportional to exhaust velocity, which seems like it should be kg*m/s ?
Summarizing the helpful links people have posted: The starting point is impulse, which is how much 'push' you can get out of your fuel, which is force*time. For the same fuel you can do less force for longer, or more force for shorter, but the product is the same \
I for one have a tendency to call this 'power' which is incorrect, it's 'impulse'. Since force = mass*acceleration and impulse = force*time, impulse = kg*(m/s*s)*s = kg*(m/s) \
Read 6 tweets
16 Jul
Trying to figure out what happened in the Avenatti case it's completely bananas and I have questions (thread)
The story is that Avenatti approached Nike threatening a lawsuit over them having violated NCAA rules that college athletes must be treated like slaves, and offered a settlement including him personally getting paid $20 million (or so) to \
run an internal investigation at Nike making sure that they continued to treat college athletes like slaves moving forwards. Clearly he personally really, really cares strongly that college athletes continue to be treated like slaves.
Read 13 tweets
15 Jul
Writing computer programs to play snake is very interesting! Here's an overview, which I have many thoughts on including a straightforwardly implementable clear improvement (thread)
A much algorithm thing which works by dividing the board into 2x2 cells which makes calculation easier for reasons is here github.com/twanvl/snake/
The inefficiencies added by the limitation to cells are extremely small and not really worth discussing, there are vastly larger optimizations to be had for much less effort and risk.
Read 13 tweets
13 Jul
And now for an explanation of how some classification algorithms work and an honest question (thread)
For classifying data like was used in the Netflix prize you have a big problem: There are lots of people and lots of movies, and the number of overlapping movie ratings different people gave is very small
In data science parlance the data is sparse and high dimensional. This makes it not very useful for guessing if a particular person would like a particular movie.
Read 25 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(