"For the benefit of those ladies who ask the right to smoke in public."
Puck magazine, 1908.
The nightmare of some Edwardian chaps; women having the same fun they were having!
But if you allow women to smoke... whatever next?!
Let's look at a few details, thread;
A widow, in stead of hiding indoors crying and mourning all day she's off to the pub, reading a police newspaper... did she bump off her husband?
Ah no, pesky kids, coming to bother mum while she's having a few drinks and smokes.
Go ask your dad!
The artist is showing us the hellish vision of women doing... well what a lot of chaps were doing!
What a self report ;)
These ladies are following the latest news that is coming in via a ticker... but shock horror, they're not worrying their pretty little heads over politics or something but over SPORTS!
That's man's stuff!
The name of the pub is quite shocking, the owner... appears to be... A WOMAN!
Shock horror!
They're even fighting... because that will happen if you allow women to smoke...
And this is the ultimate insult... the men are stuck in the backroom, out of the way, not bothering the women having their smokes, they can just sit in the parlour and talk about fashion or something.
All this and it's not even about women getting the vote...
Either way, this looks like an awesome pub.
Sorry gents, you get to sit in the parlour, ladies, join me at the bar, first round on me, bring your own smokes.
Oh final addition; I shall be smoking this pipe a dashing flyboy once gave me as a gift, can you see what it is supposed to be?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Sailors of HMS Rattlesnake bathing, drawing made by their captain Owen Stanley in the late 1840s while under orders to survey the inner route along the Great Barrier Reef and to chart the southern coast of New Guinea.
He made many drawings, a few in this thread:
This is how conspiracies are born.
Someone who doesn't understand old art (and may have problems seeing) thinks that this painting shows that Queen Mary I was brown and the painting later (literally) whitewashed to hide that but they forgot one hand... tiktok.com/@kingsmonologu…
Thinking that for a second is fine, but actually believing it and making a whole CSI video about it... that's daft.
Here's the biggest version of the painting I could find.
If we take a closer look at her brown hand...
We see that she's just wearing & holding a folded glove.
Claiming that famous historical figures, especially royals, were not the skin colour everybody thinks they had is quite popular online.
It's weird.
Nice to see an online paper that reaches so many people talk about this subject.
But seeing healthy people during the Black Death would have been very normal.
Not everyone looked sick right away or at the same time.
A thread.
I think this person describes these kind of ai videos very accurately, brilliant, what a wonderful insight, who is this wonderful lady, oh wait, hang on.
Sigh, the "It's not a documentary" excuse is so tiresome.
It's just a slightly less silly sounding way of saying "I couldn't bother to do research", "I don't really care about history" or "Ai do bleep bloop beep boop and its cool and I make money so yay".
They've done it again.
The internet is flooded with history themed Ai nonsense and people are loving it.
The History revived page has 600k followers and they're all about posting ai generated history themed rubbish.
Some of it is fun & interesting, but most of it is... well...
Lesson one every child learns: to go potty, you have to partially undress.
Romans didn't know that.
Also the sponge on a stick story is possibly nonsense.
The ghosts of Pompeii roll in their graves.
Check out the nice street lanterns and oh no, the volcano is exploding, let's all run towards the clouds of ash...
The other painting of Jean-Paul Marat's murder is more famous but this one is interesting.
It was painted by Johann Jakob Hauer (1751–1829).
Let's look at a couple of details.
Here's Neil DeGrasse Tyson talking about history with Joe Rogan.
Mr. Tyson claims that tallest thing humans built after the pyramids is the Eiffel tower... but is it?
Let's watch & check:
Let's pretend this show did what it should and had someone correcting things being said.
Even a quick google could have stopped millions of people hearing & believing this claim.
Anyway:
Tallest pyramid:
Khufu at Giza c.2570 BC: (originally) 146.7m
Eiffel tower 1889AD: 312m.
So we're supposed to believe that it took homo sapiens over 4000 years to be able to built something taller than the pyramids.
For this to be true, no building built between 2570 BC and 1889AD could have been taller than 146.7m.