I am devastated by the news of the death of my @DoughtyStreet colleague @JonathanCoopr. So much to say about this wise, funny, and intelligent man who devoted his life to human rights and particularly the defence of LGBT+ rights. He lived and breathed the concept of human dignity
I know of him for many years but after I moved to Doughty Street he was particularly kind to me. We recorded two wonderful episodes of the @BHumanPodcast together and I implore everyone to listen to them to get a taste of his irrepressible personality and the impact his work had
The inside story of the Human Rights Act's birth (which Jonathan played an important role in) anchor.fm/better-human/e…
The will be more to say, and I am sure many opportunities to read and hear more about his work and life - but for tonight, rest in peace @JonathanCoopr x
Jonathan's last tweet was indicative of the man he was: generously supporting other campaigners, standing up for the powerless, in this case trans people, circling back to his touchstone, human dignity and the institutions and laws which buttress it. RIP
He often spoke about high concepts and lofty ideals but he was also realistic and endlessly practical - a person who talked the talk of human rights concepts and also knew how to walk the walk of making human rights a reality.
Have had a proper detailed read of this judgment now - it’s a polite but very sharp evisceration of the High Court judgment. Particularly the way the lower court handled the evidence and factual findings
It’s this bit and what follows. It is quite extraordinary that the claim failed and the court said it wasn’t its place to reach findings on controversial medical topics but nonetheless it went on to do exactly that
The court of appeal was polite enough but the judges in court below will be wincing I imagine
Bell -v- Tavistock overturned. Court overstepped the mark by giving guidance on puberty blockers in a case which the claimant had effectively lost. Sounds like the right outcome judiciary.uk/judgments/bell…
The reality is that security outside synagogues, usually a mixture of volunteers and professionals, has been the norm since I was a child. I don't remember a time when anyone took the safety of synagogues for granted
Although, a recent judicial review permission decision which I will post soon (not publicly available) says people aren’t detained (strictly ‘deprived of liberty’) despite being stuck in a guarded hotel room with 15 mins exercise in the car park per day. I think that’s wrong
Here is the judgment in Khalid - permission decision (first stage of Judicial Review). Mr Justice Linden held that hotel quarantine (which for most people is 23 hrs 45 mins per day stuck in a guarded room) is not even arguably a deprivation of liberty (!) …ughtystreetchambers-my.sharepoint.com/:b:/g/personal…
Some detail (via @gabrielquotes) on the question I have been wondering about for a few months - why Lord Sumption is no longer on the Supreme Court supplementary panel. whatdotheyknow.com/request/765192…