THREAD: Biden is reportedly nominating a former judge, Keva Landrum, to be U.S. Atty in New Orleans. The history of this judge’s illegal behavior and violent crimes will shock you to the core.
A few years ago, we uncovered that Judge Landrum was running a modern day debtors' prison. The things I saw during this investigation have haunted me ever since. The story of corruption is hard to believe.
Judge Landrum and other judges were jailing very poor people in New Orleans if they couldn't pay debts. They created a "Collections Department" inside the court to illegally collect debt. When our clients couldn't pay, they were caged in unbearable conditions. It gets worse.
Judge Landrum and other judges took a cut of the profits to run their courts, creating an unconstitutional financial conflict of interest that destroyed whatever "neutrality" they were supposed to have as judges. It gets worse.
The judges even used some of these profits they extorted from the poorest people in New Orleans (disproportionately Black) on benefits for themselves and their spouses. Even the District Attorney wrote a letter asking the State Attorney General to prosecute the judges.
This scheme violated many laws, but among the most basic principles: the U.S. Constitution forbids a judge from putting a human being in a cage solely because the person cannot make a cash payment. And yet it happened every day for years. It's how Landrum and others did business.
For years, Judge Landrum and other judges devastated thousands of lives in New Orleans, overwhelmingly Black and indigent people. They then fought us @CivRightsCorps for years in federal court as we tried to stop them. Read about our case here: civilrightscorps.org/work/criminali…
What did this mean? Mothers and fathers separated from their families. People forced to sell blood plasma to pay their debts. Debtors brutalized in filthy jail cells without sunlight, fresh air, exercise, and medical care.
The violations of constitutional rights were so egregious that the federal court in New Orleans issued a judgment against Judge Landrum and other judges declaring that they were violating the basic 14th Amendment rights of some of the poorest people in New Orleans.
After she lost, Judge Landrum chose to appeal to try to preserve her financial conflict of interest. But a unanimous federal appeals court held that her financial conflict of interest violated the Fourteenth Amendment and the simple due process right to a neutral judge.
Although Landrum lost this civil case, both federal and state prosecutors ultimately decided that they would let the criminal offenses of the judges go. I’ve written a lot about how our legal system only chooses to prosecute *some* crimes by *some* people. yalelawjournal.org/forum/the-puni…
That's just one example. The Supreme Court reversed a conviction because Landrum helped DAs discriminate against Black jurors. Justices Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan took an unusual step of writing separately to call out Landrum’s behavior. theappeal.org/landrum-new-or…
And there’s much more: few people have amassed as long and as monstrous a record of fighting to keep innocent people in prison as Judge Landrum. This post by a longtime official with the Innocent Project describes many examples from Judge Landrum’s career. facebook.com/story.php?stor…
In one of the most heartbreaking stories, Landrum fought to keep an innocent teenager, Kia Stewart, in prison in horrific conditions for 10 years before he was exonerated. She ignored evidence of innocence to keep Robert Jones away from his family for an additional 8 years.
And there’s more. Landrum was a key prosecutor in the DA Office at a time when we now know from internal docs, court rulings, and prison data that the office used fake subpoenas, illegally jailed crime victims to coerce testimony, routinely hid evidence of innocence.
Over a period of years as a DA and a judge, Landrum presided over the greatest expansion of caging Black people in modern history, as New Orleans became the world leader in human caging of Black people and poor people. She made a lot of money for the bail industry and others.
Stories like this are important. They show how powerful people reward people willing to do monstrous things for them. And if we don’t make noise, the cycle of corruption will continue. To my knowledge, Biden has never publicly been asked about this corrupt nomination.
It isn’t too late to do something. For some reason (perhaps you can guess by now), it appears that Landrum's background check hasn’t been completed. And key members of the Senate who confirm nominees can be educated about her horrific history of criminality and injustice.
To my knowledge, Landrum would be the first U.S. Atty ever to serve after a court judgment that they violated federal constitutional rights. And *this* is the person that elite politicians advising Biden want to appoint to "enforce the law." People must know about it. (end)
As others have pointed out, despite this record of unethical and criminal conduct, the law firm @DeutschKerrigan in New Orleans chose to hire Landrum earlier this year and @WWLTV apparently uses her as a legal analyst. Do they know about this and not care? deutschkerrigan.com/professionals/…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Alec Karakatsanis

Alec Karakatsanis Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @equalityAlec

16 Sep
THREAD: Read this unhinged fear-mongering by the Democratic DA in Atlanta warning "dangerous people will get out of jail," and the way media just repeats her false claims with no context, correction, or skepticism. This is how mass incarceration happens: news.yahoo.com/atlanta-area-d…
First, note that the Democratic DA's talking points fit right in with the goals of the Fox News reporter. The entire story is framed around a supposed nationwide "spike" in crime that is false and misleading. Read more in depth here:
Second, no one mentions in this story that the "dangerous," "violent" people are presumed innocent, haven't been convicted, and would be released if they paid cash. No one cites real evidence: people are more likely to commit crime in the future if they are detained before trial!
Read 9 tweets
10 Sep
Today, the owner of the lucrative Jane bakery chain in San Francisco, a self-described "lifelong Democrat" emailed customers of her bakery an unhinged rant asking them to support a far-right campaign to recall the local District Attorney. A few thoughts.
First, the bakery owner has not a shred of evidence to back up any of her vague claims about "crime." There is no evidence that more police, prosecution, human caging, and family separation would lead to less crime. (She's also wrong about basic SF crime trends!) Embarrassing.
Second, that it is an unhinged cop-union delusion with no basis in reality hasn't stopped other very wealthy white people in San Francisco from spreading it. Look at how this wealthy person debases themself to call for more poor families to be separated.
Read 11 tweets
9 Sep
THREAD: One enduring truth you don't hear police mention when they talk about "crime waves" is this: violence is higher in countries that are more unequal, and violence is higher in U.S. states that are more unequal. Structural inequality kills. Let's look at the data:
In groundbreaking work studying decades of data from around the world, leading researchers found a number of things that you should know about how inequality determines all of the problems that cops, prosecutors, and judges tell you we need cages for. equalitytrust.org.uk/sites/default/…
Homicide rates are higher in more unequal rich countries:
Read 11 tweets
8 Sep
We cannot mince words: this @sacbee_news article is monstrous. The worst of Willie-Horton-style "journalism." It uses a tragic anecdote to call for cash-based child separation, and human caging in horrific conditions, contrary to all evidence about safety. sacbee.com/news/local/new…
The newspaper published this article strategically on the very day that the State legislature is considering modest changes to prevent pretrial human caging based on wealth, in a society that cages Black people 6 times more than South Africa during Apartheid. Shameful.
We must see "journalism" like this not just as ugly propaganda that is divorced from factual reality of what keeps us safe, but also as actively violent. The authors, editors, and publishers of this nonsense bear responsibility for the racist violence that will result from it.
Read 4 tweets
30 Aug
Thread: With talk of Breyer not retiring, we must remind people about his past. In 1980s Breyer was a main architect of the Sentencing Guidelines, one of the great scandals of mass human caging. But even in legal circles, most people don't know what a fraud he perpetrated. (1)
There were two main (and many more) frauds perpetrated by elite bureaucrats who designed the Sentencing Guidelines. Hundreds of thousands of poor people and people of color were consigned to millions of extra years in cages as a result of choices Breyer and his group made. (2)
First, the Guidelines purported to be scientific. Elites said they were needed to combat variation among judges. So Breyer and friends did a "past practice study." But after standardizing sentences based on past results as promised, Breyer simply increased them all! (3)
Read 8 tweets
29 Aug
Thread: On any given night, the U.S. has 580,000 unhoused people and 17 million vacant homes. As we prepare for mass pandemic evictions, how do these facts connect to booming police budgets?
A huge portion of what police do is arrest people who are unhoused. In Portland, for example, the *majority* of arrests are for human beings who are unhoused, and a *vast majority* of those are for things police call "nonviolent."
It is a choice by elite bureaucrats who control the police to spend billions to arrest, cage, control, and brutalize people without houses instead of helping all human beings have permanent safe shelter, medical care, and safety. Why?
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(