Bongino’s show today about the coverup both inside the FBI and by people like Sussmann bringing tips and evidence- a coverup that concealed their source, the Clinton Campaign- reminds me of another instance that fits the same pattern. On Sept 23, 2016, Christopher Steele met with
DOJ lawyer Bruce Ohr, and relayed to Ohr some of the fabricated claims about Trump, including the Alfa Bank fiction. Ohr testified that Steele said who he was working for, but it was a strange name Ohr had never heard before and couldn’t remember. If Ohr is telling the truth,
Steele lied. He and his firm Orbis were working under a contract with Fusion GPS (which Ohr was certainly familiar with, because his wife worked there), which in turn was working under a contract with Perkins Coie, the Clinton Campaign’s lawyers. BTW the five year anniversary of
this lie to a federal law enforcement agency is up this coming Thursday, the 23rd. What are the odds another indictment will drop before then for a Section 1001 violation (an indictment we may not immediately learn about, until Steele is arrested in London)?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Those interested in the details of the Sussmann case, as well as breadcrumbs Durham has left indicating where he may be headed, there are two articles you should read. First us by Jeff Carlson and Hans Mahncke in Epoch Times: theepochtimes.com/details-in-mic…
Jeff and Hans do a stellar job of describing the case and persons identified in the indictment. The second is by @Techno_Fog , and goes into detail on the ins and outs of possible defendants in conspiracy charges soon to be brought by Durham. Here’s @Techno_Fog ‘s excellent
This is a big deal. Tina Peters, Clerk of Mesa County, CO, got suspicious when last April, Dominion Voting announced they wanted to install new software on all voting system EMS computers in the state. Ms Peter’s surreptitiously had the EMS server in her county imaged both before
… and after the software update. She now has released a forensic report comparing the before and after images, and the findings are stunning. The report found that a majority of the log files were deleted or overwritten, including all that could show whether the server was
connected to the internet. Even worse, the entire SQL database files from past elections, including 2020, were deleted and can no longer be found on the server. As the report makes clear, these changes and deletions violate federal law regarding preservation of election records.
That the Sussmann indictment is an undisguised signal that conspiracy charges are soon to follow is transparent in the first few paragraphs of the indictment. One need not read past page one to understand where Durham is heading. All unlawful conspiracies have an object or
purpose. For example, a group of criminals might meet one night to plan to rob a bank the next day. When the robbers get caught and charged with conspiracy, the charging papers will describe the object of the conspiracy to be the robbery of the bank. In the Clinton Campaign
conspiracy, the object or purpose was successfully obtained beyond the wildest dreams of any of the conspirators. Durham begins the Sussmann indictment with a description of the success achieved by the conspiracy: Paragraph 1 describes and quotes from a NY Times article in
But Durham’s speaking indictment has flipped the script. A year ago everyone was focusing on a possible conspiracy involving high level gov’t actors: Comey, Brennan, Clapper, and maybe even Obama. Durham is likely still interested in the govt part of Spygate, but on a smaller
… scale. But his speaking indictment against Sussmann lays out a powerful overarching conspiracy by private actors to frame Trump and his associates- particularly when you factor in what’s been made public about the Steele dossier. This indictment describes a flurry of
The details in the Sussmann indictment describing the joint creation of Sussmann’s white paper, so as to avoid facts the experts knew would tend to debunk the hypothesis, are described below in this portion of a thread by @ClimateAudit :
It’s clear from the above that Durham has drawn a bulls eye on Marc Elias, Robbie Mook, Jennifer Palmieri, and-are you sitting down?- Jake Sullivan, as potential targets of a conspiracy indictment. That’s a thinly veiled suggestion that each of them need to come tell Durham what
they know and don’t know about this scheme. The indictment, in great detail, outlines a conspiracy. Other than Sussmann, Tech Executive, and the researchers, it leaves for us to guess who else was involved and could be prosecuted. Sussmann will be charged, unless he cuts a deal.
I think Durham’s long game is to ultimately charge two overlapping conspiracies- one involving non-government actors such as Simpson, Steele and the campaign to fabricate a collusion narrative and then to feed it to a compliant FBI to investigate, and a second inside- govt
… conspiracy to bury the origins and fabrications of the campaign’s conspiracy. The second of these exposes Comey and McCabe:
And the overlapping nature of the two conspiracies is proved by the CIA’s memo to the FBI in August 2016, warning that the Russians had already stumbled on the campaign’s design to create the Trump/Russian collusion narrative as a political dirty trick. That memo went to Comey