It’s been just over two weeks since most Minnesota kids returned to school, and the data has become quite clear: the school #COVID19 surge many people expected is here.
Minnesotans aged 10-19 are seeing the highest rates of new infections right now, which is unusual — over the whole outbreak, it’s been working-age adults who’ve tended to have the most cases.
Unclear how much of this is an artifact of expanded testing, though.
Minnesota does not break out its daily testing data by age. We know testing has drastically expanded in Minnesota in recent weeks, and more testing confirms a higher share of infections that were there whether we knew about it or not.
Overall, while raw *case counts* have risen the past few weeks, *positivity rate* — which controls for testing volume — has been mostly flat.
And we know that historically cases in children have been less likely to be confirmed by tests (in part due to less severe symptoms).
So it’s possible that part of what’s happening is expanded back-to-school testing is catching a higher share of pediatric infections.
But the recent rise is not JUST driven by children. Cases are up in all age brackets, and hospitalizations — a good proxy for serious cases — continue to rise.
The second chart here was mislabeled due to haste. It shows total cases per capita by age since August 2020. Correct version attached:
Positivity rate and hospitalizations are both growing at a very slow pace, so there aren’t really signs that we’re seeing a new takeoff of infections. Rather, so far, it’s more cases are shifting to a group (kids) that previously wasn’t likely to show confirmed cases.
.@mnhealth DOES track testing data by age, but they only release it
A) once per week
B) as cumulative totals
C) in a damn *PDF*
@mnhealth Looked at as a share of total cases, rather than weighted per capita, you can see how Minnesota’s case makeup is shifting toward children over the past few weeks:
No one would think to condemn the genre of historical nonfiction just because there's a bunch of badly researched polemics on the shelf at Target or Barnes & Noble. The same is true for history podcasts — the problem isn't the medium, which has been used to good & ill effect.
"Ah, but some of the most popular history podcasts are of the worst historical quality," one might say. But so it has always been, in all mediums.
I've been revisiting "The Last Dance" as late-night viewing the past week, and am continually impressed by the quality of its writing as narrative nonfiction.
One key thing that struck me last night: how the documentary handles the BAD parts of Michael Jordan's story.
"The Last Dance" is overall extremely pro-Jordan — unsurprisingly since he was involved in its production. It's been criticized for how it slighted some of the NBA players Jordan came into conflict with.
But — and this is key — it's not purely hagiographic.
"The Last Dance" spawned a bunch of imitation documentaries as other athletes and celebrities tried to capture that magic for themselves. I've seen a few, and they're often not good — in part because they're TRYING to avoid controversy. TLD's director Jason Hehir knew better.
If Walz resigns as governor to become vice president, Lt. Gov. Peggy Flanagan will become governor.
It's what happens next that gets INTERESTING. The President of the MN Senate (currently Minneapolis Democrat Bobby Joe Champion) becomes Lt. Gov....
The Minnesota Senate is currently split 33-33 between Democrats and Republicans, with one vacancy on the ballot this fall that's probably Lean D. If Champion resigns, that could lead to either a temporary Republican majority, or extended 33-33 tie, until Champion's replaced.
But it turns out that it's a murky, unsettled legal question whether Champion will HAVE to resign. Minnesota went through this issue a few years ago, when Tina Smith resigned as LG to accept a U.S. Senate appointment, and Republican Michelle Fischbach became LG.
“No principles, any methods, but no flowery language — always Yes or No, though you could only count on him if it was No.” — Clement Attlee on Stalin
“Soviet biologists were instructed to adopt the theories of the charlatan Lysenko… to disastrous effect… It is significant that Stalin left his nuclear physicists alone & never presumed to second guess *their* calculations. Stalin may well have been mad, but he was not stupid.”
“Fortunately for the West, American popular culture had an appeal that American political ineptitude could do little to tarnish.”
I finally hit on why "Hazbin Hotel" is leaving me so cold. I love a stylized sitcom about depraved souls in the afterlife struggling toward redemption: It's called "The Good Place," & while it lacked raunch, songs & art deco animation, it had sophisticated multi-layered writing.
Partly this is a difference in execution — if you hired Michael Schur to script-doctor the dialogue on "Hazbin Hotel" you'd get a much better show — but in large part it's just intent. TGP was aiming at the border between middle- and high-brow; HH is aiming at middle-low.
I see everything "Hazbin Hotel" is trying to do, and can appreciate it in an abstract sense. It's not a terrible show, it's just, like, a C+. It's competently done and has a few interesting ideas, but (4-5 episodes in) doesn't display any real verve or finesse in its writing.
You BET we polled people about #Napoleon. On the eve of a new biopic, most Americans don't know very much about Bonaparte, and what they do know, they don't especially like.
The U.S. actually has the highest rates of considering Napoleon's legacy to be "negative" of any of 8 countries YouGov polled. That includes several other countries that Napoleon actually invaded, humiliated and occupied.
What DO Americans know — or think they know — about Napoleon? Well, I regret to inform you that one of the most popular descriptors was "short," with no real difference between people who said they knew a fair bit about Napoleon and those who didn't.