Two quick thoughts: one, my 11th grade AP History teacher, Mr. Carey, used to beg us to do some clever prank, the cleverer the better. Move the whole classroom to the gym. Stuff like that. But not fundamentally destructive stuff. Channel the desire for adolescent mischief.
https://twitter.com/biblioracle/status/1440755617799409675
Two: when I first started at MIT, I took the midnight "Orange Tour," which involved several hours of guided explorations of sub-basement tunnels & the roofs of the dome & stuff. MIT has a long tradition of pranks ("hacks") & this tour was a way to teach new students the rules.
At one point on the tour, we were brought to a kind of underground "commandments" for hacking. All I remember was prioritizing being clever and not permanently damaging property or risking injury.
Rebuild a police car on the roof of the dome? Sure. Set your dorm on fire? Not cool.
And while the administration official denied any knowledge of the Orange Tour or the diffuse hacker community, of course they knew and tacitly encouraged it. Because it was more likely to safely channel the normal energy to break rules while causing the least damage or risk.
Which is all to say, there can be rules for deviancy! There always have been in societies that practiced occasional social inversions.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
