It seems that United Russia performed so poorly in the Kirov region that “Russian agent” Maria Butina, who was the number 2 candidate on the party list there, won’t get to join the Duma, as expected. (The party could still bring her in, but more on that later.)
I decided to do a little thread here about how proportional representation mandates are awarded in Russia’s system because I tried looking this up and the explanations I found were in Russian and are a tad convoluted.
First, just to refresh your memory, recall that the State Duma’s 450 seats are awarded by a mixed system: 225 in “single-mandate,” first-past-the-post races (United Russia always dominates these), and 225 in party-list voting (United Russia dominates here a bit less).
The single-mandate races are straightforward: whoever wins the most votes (even if only narrow, and even if it’s far short of a majority) wins the seat. The allocation of party-list mandates is complicated as hell.
First, the Central Election Commission calculates the “first electoral quotient” by taking all the votes cast for the parties that won more than 5% of the total (about 50.2 million last weekend) and divides it by 225. That equals about 223k. So that’s the 1st quotient.
Now take each party’s vote total and divide it by 223k. For United Russia, that’s 28,064,350 divided by 223,007.6, which equals 125.85 — so, boom, the party gets 125 seats. After some fun with fractions, United Russia gets an additional seat (KPRF and Just Russia, too).
So UR has 126 party-list seats to dish out (separate from the 198 seats its candidates won in various single-mandate races across the country). Subtract 5 from 126 b/c UR listed 5 top candidates federally: Shoigu, Lavrov, Protsenko, Shmeleva, and Kuznetsova. (More on this later.)
So now we get the “second electoral quotient”: the party’s vote total divided by the party-list mandates it has been awarded. For UR, it’s 28,064,350 divided by 121 = 231,936.78.
UR nominated a whopping 394 candidates, spread across 57 different “regional groups.” The party’s 121 party-list mandates are allocated to the regional groups that met the 2nd electoral quotient. For every 231,936 votes, a regional group crowns a deputy from its ranked list.
The exact party-list vote tallies for the Kirov region don’t appear to be published yet, but we know that United Russia won just 29.54% of the votes there. This must be lower than 231,936, which is why Regional Group #17 frontman, Governor Vasilyev, didn’t get a mandate, either.
HOWEVER, Butina still has a chance to enter the next Duma: another top candidate on one of UR’s other regional groups that did meet the 2nd election quotient could surrender his or her mandate to her. The federal-list figures could, too. (They’ll definitely surrender to someone.)
P.S. This allocation system is based on what is called the Hare quota. You can read more about it hare (get it???) if you’re weird like that: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hare_quota
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Because I am a very serious Russia expert who believes firmly that his years of area studies are no joke, I am presenting this list of top Hollywood films but if they had been made in modern-day Russia. In no particular order and to be updated randomly:
Citizen Kane (1941): renamed “Foreign Agent Kane,” a publishing tycoon attempts political influence through an army of paid propagandists, only to be exposed in the end as a sexual deviant whose kink is “rosebuds” (too disturbing to explain).
BlacKkKlansman (2018): renamed “Islamic Navalnite,” a Chechen police officer infiltrates Alexey Navalny’s Moscow headquarters to discover the opposition leader’s plot to impose a visa regime on anyone who knows the lezginka dance.
On Telegram, @plushev explains his objections to e-voting and how he’s disagreed about it with his boss, @aavst, an e-voting evangelist and the face of Moscow’s e-voting. Plushev believes the technology isn’t worth it, saying it’s too vulnerable to fraud. t.me/PlushevChannel…
I know it’s in vogue right now to dump hate on Venediktov, which is maybe precisely why I am so happy to share this contrarian thought: Venediktov’s stewardship at Ekho Moskvy and devotion to free speech are worth his e-voting fantasies. #ComeAtMeBros
P.S. Even though I am rarely (almost never) in Russia, I once met @plushev in person in Moscow at a loud bar in 2019, and the only thing I remember him saying to me was: “I thought you were much older.” #OldSoulEnergy
The authorities in Russia’s Primorsky Krai apparently don’t enjoy satire. This week, courts have locked up two actors (one for two days and another for 10) for parodying local officials. (The legal grounds are public obscenity and impersonating the cops.) kommersant.ru/doc/4998505
Among several police characters, Larisa Krivonosova plays MVD Ussuriysky District spokeswoman “Marina Vulf,” a parody of real-life MVD spokeswoman Irina Volk (“volk” means “wolf” in Russian).
Andrey Neretin plays the star of BARAKuda’s YouTube series, Vitaly Nalivkin, a fictional, violent, and slovenly municipal official. In the most recent episode, he fires a rocket launcher twice (missing both times) at a suspected bomb that turns out to be a bag of carrots.
Team Navalny now apparently endorses a criminal trial against “former journalist” @EchoMskRu editor-in-chief @aavst for his participation in Moscow’s electronic voting system (though Navalny and his spox say Putin is ultimately responsible).
Journalists, hold onto your press cards for dear life before Team Navalny snatches them away!
Incidentally, Stanovaya remarked just the other day that Venediktov’s part in the electronic voting and the hate it provokes in liberals/oppositionists could erode him so much socially that he’s no longer indispensable to the powers that be.
As others have pointed out, Navalny is now saying that United Russia’s supporters are a minority (30% of votes, 15% of all voters). This has mostly to do with party-list voting, but Smart Vote was all about single-mandate races...
In other words, Navalny is taking a victory lap for Smart Vote, but United Russia’s supermajority actually draws more now than before on dominating the races where Smart Vote supposedly weakens United Russia. t.me/navalny/3097
Team Navalny releases a new report about Maria Butina mainly but also United Russia’s single-manadate candidates in Kirov. Nothing really new here, but Pevchikh argues that Butina’s candidacy is compensation for her media campaign against Navalny. navalny.com/p/6538/
I had forgotten how truly reprehensible Butina’s “interview” with Navalny is. Visiting a political prisoner behind bars and berating him for being too negative about his life as an inmate. Just disgusting.
@pevchikh also shares some amusing certificates awarded to Butina during her imprisonment in America. I’m not sure her ascent to Russia’s rubberstamp parliament is what the U.S. social workers had in mind with “women empowering women”...