Thread by @rickhasen

I wrote @slate about how @Fedsoc is trying to play it both ways here. They won't confirm or deny if Eastman remains head of one of their practice groups, even as they continue to list him as a contributor. It's despicable. slate.com/news-and-polit…

https://twitter.com/joshtpm/status/1441004137165041670

Here's the relevant bit on @Fedsoc's relationship with John Eastman.

I've spoken at many @FedSoc events, and I'm listed as a "contributor" on their page. fedsoc.org/contributors/r…. They often bring a liberal onto their panels for a better discussion.But I won't ever speak at another FedSoc event again while Eastman remains a member in good standing.

One of the @FedSoc events I spoke at featured Ninth Circuit Judge Carlos Bea on the same panel. Judge Bea has now despicably agreed to accept an award from the Claremont Institute and will include a John Eastman panel on "election integrity." electionlawblog.org/?p=124645