The rise in the murder rate in 2020 was very real & should be examined. However, murder rates are also very volatile. Discerning a trend is impossible at this point. There were *many* factors that could have made 2020 an outlier. Also, beware being misled by % increase/decrease.
% increase/decrease can be misleading for many reasons. The murder rate in the 70s/80s was very high overall, so the graph will show small fluctuations relative to a very high baseline. Murder rate in the last decade was relatively low This makes 2020 look worse than the 70's/80s Image
Another reason % increase/decrease is misleading in year-to-year comparisons is that murder, tho too common in the U.S., is a statistically rare event. Numerically small changes in statistically rare events can lead to enormous % changes that are not meaningful in the long term
In the US, our fluctuations will often appear more extreme than in other Western democracies b/c we're flooded with guns. Guns mean you can kill multiple people at once, not just in traditional mass shootings. So one summer of extreme gun violence lead to a huge % change
So anyone who mentions the U.S. murder rate should always mention it in tandem with guns. That's the real issue here, both in terms of the wild-looking statistics, as well as the general problem of murder in the U.S.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mangy Jay

Mangy Jay Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @magi_jay

25 Sep
The thing about white people mimicking AAVE is that Black people have asked them not to do it & that should be the end of the discussion. I could give a long description of the harms of appropriation but I feel like, "Black people have said please don't do this" should be enough
And spare me comments about "it's just language change." If my only contact with British people was watching British TV & then I turned around & was like, "ALLO MATE. Was at the pub and this bloody wanker took the piss right out of me!" it would not be a case of "language change"
Yes there are dialects of English spoken by non-Black people that have come into contact w/ AAVE & naturally incorporated some features. That's different than white people imitating the dialect & being so disfluent it sounds like they've never actually been around AAVE speakers
Read 4 tweets
24 Sep
I've seen some Dems spreading rumors about the many Haitian refugees from the Southern border. There is no conspiracy. These refugees were in South/Central America after the 2010 earthquake. 2021 policy that Haitians that were already here could stay longer was misinterpreted
Haiti is a country that has been thru hell & back thousands of times over centuries. Even just within the past 10 years: earthquakes, political turmoil, extreme weather. Still being punished for being a state founded by freed slaves. That's why there are a lot of Haitian refugees
2010 earthquake sent many fleeing to Central/South America, but that doesn't mean that those countries were welcoming or offered great quality of life. These same refugees heard of the 2021 status extension for migrants already in the US & are now risking their lives to get here
Read 4 tweets
24 Sep
I wish this story had been better framed, so we could understand what the actual policy is & critique it on its merits. It's very possible that the migrant center at Guantanamo Bay is worthy of real critique, but people hear "Gitmo" & immediately think of the extrajudicial prison
I'm not defending the policy, to be clear. I'm saying we need to understand what it actually is in order to advocate for Haitian refugees. The migrant center at Guantanamo has long been used to house people intercepted at sea. So what are the current conditions at that center?
I don't know what NBC's intention was, but this point is correct. It shouldn't have been spun as deportation from the Southern border. Nor should it have been spun as novel.

Read 10 tweets
23 Sep
I agree w/ @QueenMab87. For my own part, I'll add: I understand why it would be jarring to see the tragic case of a murdered woman used as a point of contrast. I also think we should ask, when, exactly, we would prefer people of color to call out the clear disparities in coverage
I mean, do we want indigenous and Black women to wait a few weeks or to never compare how their stories are told to how the stories of white victims are told? Is that what we're asking? This seems wrong. If the contrast seems harsh to us, that's b/c a harsh reality demands it.
It's not an easy convo. There is a victim that we don't want to erase. But, again, as uncomfortable as it might be at times, WOC have a legitimate criticism of how these events are covered. & there's not a "better time" to make these criticisms than when the disparity is clearest
Read 7 tweets
22 Sep
Vaccines do stop infection & transmission in the vast majority of cases. This tweet is an example of how bad or manipulative descriptions of scientific data can lead to spurious arguments about "infectiousness of the unvaccinated," which I wrote about here alternet.org/2021/09/anti-v…
Conservative media bears a lot of responsibility here, but so does mainstream media. A lot of people walked away from media reports on breakthrough infections & viral loads w/ the impression that ALL vaccinated people were equally likely to spread COVID as unvaccinated people.
Now, to be clear: the CDC was justified in suggesting extreme caution in response to the viral load & transmissibility research, as well as other factors. However, the science does not suggest that all vaccinated people are equally likely to spread virus.
Read 5 tweets
22 Sep
Ah, yes, it was the social spending of the Great Society that led to an anti-Democratic backlash in the mid-late 1960's. It was Medicare that made the wives of men terrified of walking in streets. Nothing else was involved.
This piece is a mess, even by George Will standards. There's the bad analysis of Civil rights, combined w/ negative connotations. And Will's warning about the dire consequences of social spending is based on a book that actually argued Dems were better than the GOP on the economy
I'm not sure how true this is, but I've heard Nixon liked "The New Majority" & such arguments influenced his thinking on economic policy, including not taking an immediate hammer to the welfare state. Of course they were also in line w/ the racist dog whistling of "law & order"
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(