🧵 The wildfires in California are extraordinary, and the more I report on them the more amazing they seem - a few examples from my latest piece: grist.org/wildfires/outp…
Jeff Marsolais, Eldorado National Forest supervisor: "All of the fuels experts I have been around — people with 40-, 50-year careers — have never seen conditions like this. We were ordering up air tankers for initial fire attacks in January." January!
California is ramping up efforts to thin forests, cut brush, and do prescribed burns ramping up spending 16-fold year over year. But it takes a little while to do the environmental assessments of those projects and line up the contractors (especially on federal land - NEPA)
So what happens when you are planning tons of projects in the most fire-prone areas and then gigantic fires spread? Yep, a lot of those project burn before they can start:
Tom Esgate, operations manager for the Lassen County Fire Safe Council: “If you want to see a wildfire come to your community, all you need to do is have Tom Esgate plan your project. It’s been like whack-a-mole around here.”
Note - the chart above doesn't contain every project: for instance the Mapes project on Plumas NF, where workers were waiting for a break in the dry weather to get in and do Rx burns. Turns out climate change can make it hard to do climate adaption.
The fires are still burning and the @R5_Fire_News and @CALFIRE_PIO have their hands full, so we won't know the full extent for months.
Moisture is low all over the West. But it's particularly egregious in California where we've had years of relatively low precip + a snowpack that disappears by June. It sure looks like a lot of forests are transitioning to a much drier biome - and that means more fire.
It's not all dire though. In a lot of places these giant fires are doing the fuels reduction work (on a much grander scale) as the planned projects. And a lot of the projects affected by fire will continue in part, or pivot to cleaning up and post-fire resilience.
And for all the projects burning, a lot are getting done. @Morse4America pointed out that projects the state funded this April in South Lake Tahoe were done in time to save that community from the Caldor Fire. That's fast!
And @RicardoLara4CA has pushed to create a state fund to backstop the liability insurance for Rx burn pros so that it's not totally unaffordable.
This story is a perfect example of something I see all the time reporting on climate change: As a society we punish those who act quickly, especially when those actions cause damage - like an escaped Rx burn. We don't get as upset when INACTION causes more damage.
With climate change, that tendency to pump the brakes, and make sure our actions aren't inadvertently causing harm, may do even more damage.
I get frustrated with environmental NIMBY's who block clean energy projects. But I also agree with their arguments: solar plants can trample tribal rights, kill tortoises, and alter aesthetics of the landscape. Those thing hit me in the gut. wsj.com/articles/solar…
The frustration sets in when no one frankly acknowledges that EVERY new clean power station is going to "destroy this land forever,” wherever that land may be. And EVERY big infrastructure project like this requires balancing the wishes and rights of different groups.
It's easy to point out the problems with a proposal. But doing so relies on the assumption that the alternatives are not going to be even worse. And with the climate warming we shouldn't make that assumption. The motto "Come back later with something better," = status quo
A hopeful piece from @shannonosaka on sneaky climate policy. "It’s not particularly sexy, or particularly interesting. And that’s the whole point. 'Lack of public attention is a feature, not a bug,' @atrembath explained." Historically, it's how bills pass grist.org/politics/why-b…
Tomorrow night Berkeley, CA, will vote on ending single family zoning. It's something local activist Dorothy Walker has been working on for half a century. My story: grist.org/cities/zoned-o…
Cities across the US are allowing more diverse housing by doing away with single family zones - see also Oakland, San Jose, which are exploring the idea
When @loridroste introduced it in Berkeley with @TaplinTerry and @RigelRobinson she hammered out this epic thread. I read it and thought - wait really?
Instead of canceling the guy, I wish we would take this opportunity to understand the man in full -- not just as a prophet or a wilderness mystic, but as an affluent farmer who went to war with nature on his ranch, but deemed it sacred when hiking in the mountains.
He was perfectly happy to extract resources from the natural world to support himself, but condemned Native Americans for doing the same in the places he wanted to hike, and helped kick them off their land.