Lots of Sancho talk lately and I'm here to set the record straight in this mega-thread...
Sancho is a complete wide player in the sense that he ticks every single box. There's nothing he cannot do. However, complete ≠ guaranteed success, as performing a role is often more valuable than completeness (see Pogba in central midfield vs the likes of Fred and McTominay).
So, with Sancho, does his complete skillset correlate to his role as a wide player in a 4-2-3-1? Yes, it 100% does.
Sancho is more in the ilk of a Ribery than a traditional direct, electric, hit-the-byline winger. He primarily relies on skill to beat his man as opposed to pace.
Sancho is one of the cleanest technical attackers in the sport. Attackers often come across as technically inconsistent despite being technically proficient because they're playing in high-risk areas where they have to be creative & take those high risks, so things can go wrong.
However, this is certainly not the case with Sancho. Sure, he won't always be clean technically considering the conditions within his role as outlined above, but the player doesn't force play with his actions so is less prone to making technical errors than a Salah, for example.
Sancho is closer to a playmaker than he is a creator in the sense that he'll look to pick the right pass as opposed to force creative passes ala KDB. He's closer to someone like peak Ozil in his passing who had an amazing combination of keeping the ball but also being direct.
That combination of playmaking and direct play is a dream tool for a manager to possess in all facets of play, especially when the player also has the ability to beat their man in 1v1 situations with skilled dribbling. Again, athletically, he ain't no CR7, but he can be an outlet
Sure Sancho is more reliant on skill to beat his man but he still makes runs into space along with being quite quick across the ground and that combined with his temperament in possession means if he gets hold of the ball he's capable of recycling or punishing teams in transition
Sancho is not a freak athlete who'll constantly get the team up the pitch like Antonio. However, I'd argue he's caught in between peak Hazard and current Grealish in terms of his ability as an outlet.
Where they're similar is in the sense that if they get the ball they're highly likely to keep it because they're elite needle players. However, Grealish doesn't make runs in behind - Sancho does. However, again, Hazard had more confidence + superior athleticism to bully defenders
So being caught in the middle of those two isn't a bad thing. Sancho can be an outlet.
Outlets are also renowned for being penetrative players in the final third, and that's exactly what Sancho is too. Sancho makes those diagonal runs into the box enabling him to score goals.
Again, directly in relation to his shooting, his ball striking on either foot is fantastic. Sancho has a similar shift in his game to Willian which enables him to get a yard of space to get a strike off on either foot.
So, on paper, he's the dream on-ball attacker.
Off the ball, Sancho is a diligent presser who blocks space in an intense manner on the outside of a 4-4-2 block along with tracking back and pressing his pressing triggers. He also can act as an outlet when a turnover occurs. So he's a top defensive player too.
Right, so now we have established that Sancho is a Frank Ribery esque special technician who has a top combination of playmaking, creativity, athleticism and work rate, it's clear he's a top player from a qualitative perspective.
So, this begs the question as to why has his start not been absolutely electric because he's so good?
Well, life isn't linear. He missed a large part of pre-season, has just joined a new team with fierce characters such as Ronaldo and B. Fernandes, & is only 21. 4 big factors.
Sancho is currently a reductionist version of himself because he lacks confidence. He is primarily a combiner, and that makes him one of the most useful players in world football vs low blocks when combined with his creativity + runs off the ball. However, he lacks directness.
This is not because he lacks directness as a player, because he doesn't, but because it's difficult to take risks when you're 21 and just made a multimillion pound move to Manchester United. Again, most of his football at BVB was without fans - there's so many factors here.
Yes, other players would come in and excel straight away thanks to a superior mentality (assuming they had the same skillset), but not everyone is the same, and some people take longer than others, and that's okay. Sancho is a special boy - give him time.
The current tactical environment at Manchester United doesn't suit him within his current mental state either. United's games largely lack control and are end-to-end. When a player like Sancho lacks confidence to partake in direct/aggressive actions, that doesn't suit him.
It's no coincidence his best games and moments in general have came against low blocks and within combination play. Sancho is elite at combining and makes runs off the back of that combination play but most of United's games have been transition-based - he's not direct right now!
Sancho is elite at every facet of play and will only improve as he grows mentally. If he has the mentality to be the main man at Manchester United he can be that and that'll see his game & style commanding authority enabling him to dictate attacks as opposed to being a sidepiece.
However, even if he doesn't have that main man mentality, his quality is so good that he can still be a massive success for the club. Not all creative players have to control attacks to be elite - his quality is so good that he can be the elite sidepiece in attack - that's okay!
Either way, overall, it's clear Jadon Sancho will be successful at Manchester United sooner rather than later provided he continues to work hard. He excels at every facet of attacking play & is superb defensively too. Once he grows in confidence, he'll soar.
Watch this space ✌️
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The only way to judge the long-term future of a top club with its current manager is to look at the system he has implemented and ask yourself 'will this team win a league with this system in the assumption the manager gets what he wants in the market?'
I applied that to Spurs.
A crucial preface is to note that Nuno has only managed a couple of games at the club so this entire thread may become irrelevant if he throws this tactic out the window, which isn't impossible.
Anyway, Spurs press high in a narrow 4-3-3 with inverted wingers, ala Liverpool.
The implementation on the ball is virtually the same as Liverpool's with 3 athletic, ball dominant (bar Alli) 2nd phase midfielders, fullbacks high & wide, and the 3 attackers in close proximity between the lines. All fluid, but good enough to succeed w/ right off-ball structure.
Ahead of Ronaldo's second debut for Manchester United, I think it's important to remember and pay tribute to the man behind it all - Ole Gunnar Solskjaer. Utd were not in a position to bring Ronaldo into the club since Sir Alex left because they were so far behind - not anymore..
When Solskjaer first came into the club, United were very obviously a mess and far from the Champions League spots, let alone challenging for the title. He cleared out a lot of deadwood, sold the overweight and underperforming Lukaku, and signed D. James, Harry Maguire, and AWB.
At the time the market was void of top attackers apart from the mega-deals of Griezmann & Hazard to the top Spanish clubs. Pepe, Haller, Ayoze, Joelinton, & Wesley were amongst the most expensive signings in the PL, highlighting how clubs in the league took gambles in the market.
Omobamidele is yet another technically proficient Irish central defender who is well suited to playing in a back 3 alongside the likes of O'Shea. That, combined w/ 1) Bazunu's/Kelleher's technical level, 2) top wingbacks in Doherty & Stevens, & 3) outlets up front is encouraging
Again, Kenny's tactical level is largely good, despite minor errors here and there. The biggest issue is that Ireland don't control games against worse teams via pressing despite pressing well against the best teams. They need to maintain their aggression vs the worse sides.
Dropping into a deeper block is necessary & forced vs the better teams but that's not the case against the likes of Azerbaijan/Luxembourg. They can be controlled via pressing, especially considering Ireland have better players than those nations.
What people forget about Arsenal is that their squad is primed to peak at the same time - Ramsdale, Gabriel, White, Tierney, Partey, Xhaka, Saka, Smith-Rowe, Odegaard.. even Pepe if he sorts his attitude out. They're near guaranteed to become top end players at the highest level.
Sure, there'll be some bumps along the way because Arteta is still in the midst of the rebuild so they have to deal with the likes of Lacazette & co, but the long-term future is so clearly bright especially when considering they're playing in a top tactical system that suits them
This is the team Arteta inherited. Only Xhaka, Pépé and Aubameyang could even be considered in the long-term future of the club. Likes of Ozil and Guendouzi as back ups.. not only is this lot nowhere near good enough quality wise, but their attitude also stinks.
Ramsdale is a brilliant signing for Arsenal. Mikel Arteta deserves a lot of credit for this one, and below, on my YouTube channel, I explain why that is the case.
Ramsdale's kicking and profile adds a number of dimensions that Leno previously crippled Arsenal with. His ability to punt the ball further than the German enables Arsenal to assert their pressing quality on games. He's also a much better technician when building play.
However, Ramsdale is *NOT* risk-averse. He will make traditional goalkeeping errors because he was quite poor in that regard for a lot of last season (despite improvement), & he lacks experience when playing out from the back because of his role at Sheffield United. He needs time
Arteta may not sign natural passers to control games because he feels they’re too rare, not tactical players or not athletic enough. So Arsenal will try to dominate games with the ball but accept that there’s other good teams too so we must control games without the ball too.
He’s not going to approach it with the close-minded possession, possession, possession based approach but more so the controlled one. Arteta played under Moyes at Everton where they so often beat big teams without the ball. Classic 4-4-2. Also at Arsenal where they failed at that
So how do you control games vs inferior teams and beat them repeatedly? With the ball and via pressing. How do you control games vs similar standard/better teams? If you’re a possession based team, with the ball but be able to control games without it too.