Thread by @epolynya

This is very myopic - in the long term all of this is false.

- Rollups & volitions can and will be fully decentralized and inherit the security and decentralization properties of whatever is the most secure and decentralized security layer. Hermez is already there.

(1/5)

https://twitter.com/el33th4xor/status/1441614091441819650

- Anything any centralized monolithic chain can do, a volition can necessarily do orders of magnitude better, in every way.

- Volitions remain fully composable across multiple data availability sources.

- zkRs & volitions let you withdraw immediately, ORs have bridges.

(2/5)

- zkRs/volitions have significantly superior liquidity sharing properties than monolithic chains. E.g. liquidity is fractured between Avalanche and Ethereum, or C-chain and D-chain. However, with initiatives like dAMM, you can share liquidity between StarkNet and Loopring.

(3/5)

I get it, Emin must shill his wares. Rollups are barely beta MVPs with multiple training wheels. Both Polygon PoS & Avalanche C-chain are competent short-term makeshift solutions, at the cost of security and decentralization.

(4/5)

However, it's obvious volitions are far superior in every way - faster, cheaper, more composable, less liquidity fragmentation; more secure, decentralized *and* scalable.

StarkNet is coming in ~2 months, and maturing over the next year or so.

The clock is ticking.

(5/5)