White mass shooter syndrome is real. We as a society must move beyond our privilege about which mass shoutings we choose to pay attention to based on race. We must dedicate ourselves and commit to highlighting mass shooters of color.
The media can do better highlighting non white mass shootings and we as a country can do better by demanding equitable treatment for mass shooters of color.
Our media spends an inequitable amount of time focusing on white mass shooters when there are several cases of mass shooters of color that go ignored weekly. This has to change if we are to become a more anti-racist and equitable country.
It is the duty of people with large platforms to make the change they want to see. Highlighting only white mass shooters and only elevating their stories is deeply seeded in our country's institutionalized racism. We must do better. We can do better.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
As Bulwark writers try to gaslight in my mentions, it's a fun time to remind people that it's a 501c3 funded by progressive donors that also tries to use things like movie reviews and food recipes to cover for that.
And any person who voluntarily participates in that exercise knows exactly what they're doing, even as they try to distant themselves from that kind of craziness. Cash those paychecks,
Substack could use more great movie reviews. Without all the political ickiness
Seems pretty newsy that it's all being revealed the President of the United States was an invalid, and while he was in office, Russia invaded Ukraine and will bog us down for years because of it.
Feel like these are the questions currently being ignored.
Seems pretty newsy that we're learning the President was senile during a catastrophic withdrawal from Afghanistan that saw 13 service members killed and the Taliban back in control.
He took 6 questions in 4 years about it.
This is why the media's role in all of this cannot be washed away after a couple of books.
It's why "Just a couple of aides we aren't going to name" isn't good enough and it's why all of these people need to be hauled in front of Congress.
The opposite is actually happening. The right was calling out the lack of media coverage on Fetterman while he was running and babbling nonsensically through a debate.
The right isn't *defending* John Fetterman. We're just asking about the curious, sudden timing, and neither Chait nor anyone else can answer how he's changed from 2022, to now.
It's about Israel, and EVERYONE knows it. Chait and the media are the ones who have to explain why they didn't cover his health back then, but are so eager to do so now.
All they have to do, Kara Swisher in particular, is answer what's the difference between John Fetterman from 2 years ago, and John Fetterman now.
They won't do it.
No one on the right is actually saying, "John Fetterman is sharp and fit behind closed doors."
We're just noticing the obvious hit job against him.
Federal employees being completely lost in the dark policy-wise without being informed by whatever Politico is publishing is the tell of all tells here.
"How will federal agencies direct policy without Politico's invaluable directions?"
So we're clear here, this is a progressive journalist admitting that they believe their job is to shape how policymakers think in federal agencies, on things like abortion, climate, etc.. and without them, these employees would be lost in the woods.