.@MassAGO staying silent even though she knows.@burnslev is engaging in criminal extortion of over $410,000 of my due inheritance from their murder of Dad on March 15, 2019...
@MassAGO@burnslev THREAD 1/ filed on Monday, 9.21.2021 in federal court in Massachusetts District Court (1st circuit)
Docket No. 1:21-cv-11453-FDS
Emergency injunctive &declaratory action re extortion for whistleblowing re court appointees exploitation re Netflix aired documentary #GuardianInc
2/
3/Emergency injunctive &declaratory action re extortion for whistleblowing re court appointees exploitation re Netflix aired documentary #GuardianInc
4/ Emergency injunctive & declaratory action re extortion for whistleblowing re court appointees exploitation re Netflix aired documentary #GuardianInc
5/ Emergency injunctive & declaratory action re extortion for whistleblowing re court appointees exploitation re Netflix aired documentary #GuardianInc
6/ Emergency injunctive & declaratory action re extortion for whistleblowing re court appointees exploitation re Netflix aired documentary #GuardianInc
7/ Emergency injunctive & declaratory action re extortion for whistleblowing re court appointees exploitation re Netflix aired documentary #GuardianInc
8/ Emergency injunctive & declaratory action re extortion for whistleblowing re court appointees exploitation re Netflix aired documentary #GuardianInc
9/ Emergency injunctive & declaratory action re extortion for whistleblowing re court appointees exploitation re Netflix aired documentary #GuardianInc
10/ Emergency injunctive & declaratory action re extortion for whistleblowing re court appointees exploitation re Netflix aired documentary #GuardianInc
11/ Emergency injunctive & declaratory action re extortion for whistleblowing re court appointees exploitation re Netflix aired documentary #GuardianInc
12/ Emergency injunctive & declaratory action re extortion for whistleblowing re court appointees exploitation re Netflix aired documentary #GuardianInc
13/ Emergency injunctive & declaratory action re extortion for whistleblowing re court appointees exploitation re Netflix aired documentary #GuardianInc
14/ Emergency injunctive & declaratory action re extortion for whistleblowing re court appointees exploitation re Netflix aired documentary #GuardianInc
15/ Emergency injunctive & declaratory action re extortion for whistleblowing re court appointees exploitation re Netflix aired documentary #GuardianInc
16/ Emergency injunctive & declaratory action re extortion for whistleblowing re court appointees exploitation re Netflix aired documentary #GuardianInc
17/ Emergency injunctive & declaratory action re extortion for whistleblowing re court appointees exploitation re Netflix aired documentary #GuardianInc
18/ Emergency injunctive & declaratory action re extortion for whistleblowing re court appointees exploitation re Netflix aired documentary #GuardianInc
19/ Emergency injunctive & declaratory action re extortion for whistleblowing re court appointees exploitation re Netflix aired documentary #GuardianInc
20/ Emergency injunctive & declaratory action re extortion for whistleblowing re court appointees exploitation re Netflix aired documentary #GuardianInc
21/ Emergency injunctive & declaratory action re extortion for whistleblowing re court appointees exploitation re Netflix aired documentary #GuardianInc
22/ Emergency injunctive & declaratory action re extortion for whistleblowing re court appointees exploitation re Netflix aired documentary #GuardianInc
23/ Emergency injunctive & declaratory action re extortion for whistleblowing re court appointees exploitation re Netflix aired documentary #GuardianInc
24/ Emergency injunctive & declaratory action re extortion for whistleblowing re court appointees exploitation re Netflix aired documentary #GuardianInc
25/ Emergency injunctive & declaratory action re extortion for whistleblowing re court appointees exploitation re Netflix aired documentary #GuardianInc
26/ Emergency injunctive & declaratory action re extortion for whistleblowing re court appointees exploitation re Netflix aired documentary #GuardianInc
27/ Emergency injunctive & declaratory action re extortion for whistleblowing re court appointees exploitation re Netflix aired documentary #GuardianInc
28/ Emergency injunctive & declaratory action re extortion for whistleblowing re court appointees exploitation re Netflix aired documentary #GuardianInc
29/ Emergency injunctive & declaratory action re extortion for whistleblowing re court appointees exploitation re Netflix aired documentary #GuardianInc
30/ Emergency injunctive & declaratory action re extortion for whistleblowing re court appointees exploitation re Netflix aired documentary #GuardianInc
31/ Emergency injunctive & declaratory action re extortion for whistleblowing re court appointees exploitation re Netflix aired documentary #GuardianInc
32/ Emergency injunctive & declaratory action re extortion for whistleblowing re court appointees exploitation re Netflix aired documentary #GuardianInc
33/ Emergency injunctive & declaratory action re extortion for whistleblowing re court appointees exploitation re Netflix aired documentary #GuardianInc
34/ Emergency injunctive & declaratory action re extortion for whistleblowing re court appointees exploitation re Netflix aired documentary #GuardianInc
35/ Emergency injunctive & declaratory action re extortion for whistleblowing re court appointees exploitation re Netflix aired documentary #GuardianInc
36/ Emergency injunctive & declaratory action re extortion for whistleblowing re court appointees exploitation re Netflix aired documentary #GuardianInc
37/ Emergency injunctive & declaratory action re extortion for whistleblowing re court appointees exploitation re Netflix aired documentary #GuardianInc
38/ Emergency injunctive & declaratory action re extortion for whistleblowing re court appointees exploitation re Netflix aired documentary #GuardianInc
39/ Emergency injunctive & declaratory action re extortion for whistleblowing re court appointees exploitation re Netflix aired documentary #GuardianInc
40/ Emergency injunctive & declaratory action re extortion for whistleblowing re court appointees exploitation re Netflix aired documentary #GuardianInc
41/ Emergency injunctive & declaratory action re extortion for whistleblowing re court appointees exploitation re Netflix aired documentary #GuardianInc
42/ Emergency injunctive & declaratory action re extortion for whistleblowing re court appointees exploitation re Netflix aired documentary #GuardianInc
43/ Emergency injunctive & declaratory action re extortion for whistleblowing re court appointees exploitation re Netflix aired documentary #GuardianInc
44/ Emergency injunctive & declaratory action re extortion for whistleblowing re court appointees exploitation re Netflix aired documentary #GuardianInc
45/ Emergency injunctive & declaratory action re extortion for whistleblowing re court appointees exploitation re Netflix aired documentary #GuardianInc
46/ Emergency injunctive & declaratory action re extortion for whistleblowing re court appointees exploitation re Netflix aired documentary #GuardianInc
47/ Emergency injunctive & declaratory action re extortion for whistleblowing re court appointees exploitation re Netflix aired documentary #GuardianInc
48/ Emergency injunctive & declaratory action re extortion for whistleblowing re court appointees exploitation re Netflix aired documentary #GuardianInc
49/ Emergency injunctive & declaratory action re extortion for whistleblowing re court appointees exploitation re Netflix aired documentary #GuardianInc
50/ Emergency injunctive & declaratory action re extortion for whistleblowing re court appointees exploitation re Netflix aired documentary #GuardianInc
51/ Emergency injunctive & declaratory action re extortion for whistleblowing re court appointees exploitation re Netflix aired documentary #GuardianInc
52/ Emergency injunctive & declaratory action re extortion for whistleblowing re court appointees exploitation re Netflix aired documentary #GuardianInc
53/ Emergency injunctive & declaratory action re extortion for whistleblowing re court appointees exploitation re Netflix aired documentary #GuardianInc
54/ Emergency injunctive & declaratory action re extortion for whistleblowing re court appointees exploitation re Netflix aired documentary #GuardianInc
55/ Emergency injunctive & declaratory action re extortion for whistleblowing re court appointees exploitation re Netflix aired documentary #GuardianInc
56/ Emergency injunctive & declaratory action re extortion for whistleblowing re court appointees exploitation re Netflix aired documentary #GuardianInc
57/ Emergency injunctive & declaratory action re extortion for whistleblowing re court appointees exploitation re Netflix aired documentary #GuardianInc
Please @UnrollHelper the above 57-paged emergency federal action re extortion of attorney whistleblower Lisa Siegel Belanger (@TPCLJ) by court-appointees in the Massachusetts sham guardianship of #JohnSavanovich previously Netflix-aired documentary #GuardianInc#DirtyMoney2
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
@McAdooGordon@KingMakerFT@ProfMJCleveland What they said was is that the mandamus was not seeking relief from an order--that the relief sought was asking a judge to rule in a certain manner; they emphasized mandamus was not seeking relief from an order.
@McAdooGordon@KingMakerFT@ProfMJCleveland Example of needed framed request for relief: seeking the order of May 13, 2020 to be stricken based on erroneous denial to dismiss...
Which is different than asking the court to direct a judge to make a specific ruling as if the judge didn't make a decision.
Here are D.C. Court of Appeals Judge Srinivasan's own direct written words regarding a prosecutor's decision to bring or not bring criminal charges in the decision of U.S. v. Fokker,
818 F.3d 733 (D.C. Cir. 2016):
2/ "The Executive's primacy in criminal charges is long settled. That authority stems from the Constitution's delegation of 'take care' duties, U.S. Const. art II, section 3, and the pardon power."
3/ Judge Srinivasan described factors that a prosecutor's decision:
"the strength of the case, the prosecution's general deterence value, the govt's enforcement priorities and the case's relationship to the govt's overall enforcement plan."
@ThyConsigliori Specifically, I will show how Judge Sullivan’s May 13, 2020 Order to appoint Ret. Judge Gleeson as an “amicus curiae” indicates premeditated joint venture intended to influence, impede due & proper administration of the law in a pending DOJ court proceeding.
@ThyConsigliori 1/ 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1505 (Obstruction of Justice) states:
Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due & proper administration of the law (cont'd below)
2/ In Part 1 of my D2J blog article Judge Emmet Sullivan Wears No Clothes, I explain how and why Judge Sullivan’s court order appointing Ret. John Gleeson as “amicus curiae” is in fact a sham—
3/ I specifically, walk the reader through 50 U.S.C. Sec. 1803(4), the federal statute that defines the scope and purpose of an “amicus curiae”.