A MUST: check out @newprisoner6's awesome THOUGHT PROVOKING monologues 🔥

https://twitter.com/newprisoner6/status/1598906102992621568

@newprisoner6's monologues are MOST AWESOME via audio which PLEASE DO:
rumble.com/v1yhoeu-sediti…

. . .AND Here is Sedition EP63 Monologue in "black & white"--see below thread:

.@MassAGO staying silent even though she knows.@burnslev is engaging in criminal extortion of over $410,000 of my due inheritance from their murder of Dad on March 15, 2019...

https://twitter.com/TPCLJ/status/1433738708197519401

@MassAGO @burnslev THREAD
1/ filed on Monday, 9.21.2021 in federal court in Massachusetts District Court (1st circuit)
Docket No. 1:21-cv-11453-FDS

Emergency injunctive &declaratory action re extortion for whistleblowing re court appointees exploitation re Netflix aired documentary #GuardianInc

Here's my mojo for We The People on November 3, 2020

Ain't No Stopping US NOW!! 💪🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲

We're on a groove!!!
cc: @realDonaldTrump @RichardGrenell
💪🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲

@McAdooGordon @KingMakerFT @ProfMJCleveland What they said was is that the mandamus was not seeking relief from an order--that the relief sought was asking a judge to rule in a certain manner; they emphasized mandamus was not seeking relief from an order. @McAdooGordon @KingMakerFT @ProfMJCleveland Example of needed framed request for relief: seeking the order of May 13, 2020 to be stricken based on erroneous denial to dismiss...

Which is different than asking the court to direct a judge to make a specific ruling as if the judge didn't make a decision.

1/
D2J Thread
August 26, 2020

Here are D.C. Court of Appeals Judge Srinivasan's own direct written words regarding a prosecutor's decision to bring or not bring criminal charges in the decision of U.S. v. Fokker,
818 F.3d 733 (D.C. Cir. 2016): 2/
"The Executive's primacy in criminal charges is long settled. That authority stems from the Constitution's delegation of 'take care' duties, U.S. Const. art II, section 3, and the pardon power."

@ThyConsigliori Specific criminal offense at the end of Judge Sullian's road. Question is will AG Barr fulfill his sworn oath & duty?
👇

https://twitter.com/TPCLJ/status/1269676060855205888?s=20

@ThyConsigliori Specifically, I will show how Judge Sullivan’s May 13, 2020 Order to appoint Ret. Judge Gleeson as an “amicus curiae” indicates premeditated joint venture intended to influence, impede due & proper administration of the law in a pending DOJ court proceeding.

#JudicialLawlessness
#NationwideCrisis

1/ D2J BLOG Thread Part 2:
Judge Emmet Sullivan Wears No Clothes
by Lisa Siegel Belanger, J.D. (*actively licensed)
June 7, 2020

@TamaraLeigh_llc @ThyConsigliori
@GenFlynn @BarbaraRedgate @realDonaldTrump 2/ In Part 1 of my D2J blog article Judge Emmet Sullivan Wears No Clothes, I explain how and why Judge Sullivan’s court order appointing Ret. John Gleeson as “amicus curiae” is in fact a sham—

1/ Thread re: D.C. Court of Appeals below Order for oral argument in Gen Flynn case

By: Lisa Siegel Belanger, Esq. of
Destination2Justice.com

Posting Date: June 2, 2020 2/
This is a P.S.A. thread for nonlawyers re my calling out RED FLAGS of bias by the Court of Appeals IN FAVOR of Justice Emmet Sullivan.

See link to view Judge Sullivan's deep & wide ties in his role w/ the D.C. Judicial Nomination Commission

bit.ly/3donnOe

1) D2J BLOG Thread

Judicial Lawlessness: A Nationwide Crisis
Part 1: Judge Emmet Sullivan Wears No Clothes
posted on May 30, 2020 by Lisa Siegel Belanger, J.D.

destination2justice.com/d2j-blog/
FULL ARTICLE HERE:
@TamraLeigh_llc @ThyConsigliori @GenFlynn @BarbaraRedgate @SidneyPowell1 2/ I might be the only accredited (juris doctorate) legal professional who will not sugar coat Judge Emmet Sullivan’s over-the-top abuse of power in his issuance of his May 13, 2020 order in the General Michael Flynn case entitled: “Order Appointing Amicus Curiae”.