It makes me smile when a product manager tells me they need a full time researcher before they can do any research.

I look them in the eyes and say “you’re a full time user researcher.”

All PMs are user researchers.
Maybe not a good one.
However, they can become a better one.
User research is what PMs do.

They identify what users and customers need. Why the product doesn’t do that yet. What needs to change to make the user’s life better.

It’s the most important part of their job.
The great user research a PM has, the better their product will be. We’ve got 40 years of product management history to prove this.

It’s too bad the PM literature ignores this fact that user research is critical to great PM work.

It would make their jobs so much easier.
Too many PMs spend so much time compensating because they don’t have a great, solid, research-informed understanding of their customers and users.

All that time would be better spent growing their understanding.

It would make their jobs so much easier.
I love it when a PM says they need a researcher.

It’s because I can give them two incredibly valuable gifts.

The gift of knowledge and the gift of time.

It one of the most awesome parts of my job.
It’s true that research done poorly can hurt the product and it takes skill to do research well.

However, the PM is already making critical product decisions with the research they have, often of poor quality.

For many, from where they are today, the only direction is up.
PMs haven’t cornered the market on asking poorly-formed research questions. I’ve seen “trained” UX researchers do this too.

Research is a set of learned skills. PMs can learn them just like everyone else.

We have to see that possibility to open the gateway to better research.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jared Spool

Jared Spool Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jmspool

19 Sep
Current status Image
Frog on a log Image
Status Update: Image
Read 4 tweets
18 Aug
"Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good."

In UX design, this thinking delivers more damage than benefit.

There's usually a LOT of distance between good and perfect.

Good leaves room for better, which, when provided by someone else, leaves our designs behind.
We can do more that just good.

We can meet needs and exceed expectations.

We can excel beyond just satisfactory. (Satisfaction surveys should be banned in UX design. They measure the wrong things.)
There's a lot we can do to go beyond just being "good" before we come anywhere near being "perfect."

We should strive to provide experiences that people want, need, and enjoy.

Don't let the good be the enemy of the better.
Read 4 tweets
15 Aug
Current status Image
Image
Image
Read 5 tweets
6 Jun
This is better than the Shopify scooter → car diagram.

However, it still leaves out the most important aspect of an MVP: That it’s an instrument for learning, not an actual product.

Eric Reis defined it as the least work necessary to learn the most about users needs.

1/
We should be creating simple MVPs to learn what people need.

That’s not how it’s used in many places. Instead, people see it as the least we can build to claim we shipped something.

2/
When we think in terms of learning, instead of shipping, we don’t need to give it to everyone. Just enough to learn something.

And we also need to make sure we have the instrumentation and process in place to actually learn.

Shipping something and moving on is not learning.
3/
Read 10 tweets
5 Jun
It seems quick for some hiring managers to complain that applicants may not have a portfolio available to apply to their open UX positions.

Their complaint is often that it makes it harder for them to determine if the candidate is qualified for the position.

1/11
This is not as much a problem for the candidate than it is for the hiring manager.

Smart hiring managers know how to evaluate candidates who may, for many legit reasons, not have an up-to-date portfolio that showcases work.

2/11
Legit reasons include:

• having work under NDA,

• not having work that has shipped due to reasons they had no control over,

• and having family or life obligations that make it hard to do additional work outside of their jobs.

(There are other reasons too.)
3/11
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(