The challenge is simple: We've given a series of measurement conversion problems; your goal is to identify the resulting units, indicated by blanks. (Many are imperial units — although not all of them are! A few are rather obscure.) bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
From there, you'll need to make another logical leap to "convert" each unit you've identified into a single letter. Putting those letters together will spell out this week's answer, which is one way we might characterize the switch back to imperial units. bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
We've indicated the number of letters in each unit name in parentheses after the blank; these numbers don't count the "s" at the end of plural units, which we've filled in for you. bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
We've also provided a few hints for cases where the proper interpretation might depend on the measurement context. bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
Note also that we've rounded everything on the left side to three digits after the decimal place, which means that the two sides won't always match up perfectly. bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
To get started with these, you first need to figure out what type of measurement each given unit represents. Then it often helps to divide out the multiples. bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
For example, BUSHELS are a measure of capacity for dry goods. The puzzle asks: 2 of what unit equals 0.032 BUSHELS? Dividing both sides by 2, we see that corresponds to the question: What unit is equal to 0.016 BUSHELS? bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
With a tiny bit of research, we can then discover that 0.016 BUSHELS (rounded up) equal 1 PINT. (And note that's an imperial pint, rather than a US pint.) bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
That approach should get you started filling in our missing units, but don't forget about that extra logical leap at the end! The final answer you're looking for is a ten-letter phrase. bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
If you uncover the true weight of these measurements — or if you even make partial progress — please let us know at skpuzzles@bloomberg.net before midnight New York time on Thursday, October 7. bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
My column today in @bopinion: The world can have vaccine boosters and first doses, too – the key is to explicitly contract on expanding production capacity: bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
If we expand capacity, this increases total production throughput. And even if initial booster doses come out of global supply, increased production enables other countries to catch up – in the long run, speeding up global vaccination. bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
In this series, he uses on-chain randomization to take classic art back in time – it's "as if a hundred-year-old dried painting is reversed to the liquid state"
Happy new year! Interesting numerical properties of 2021: a thread👇
2021 = 4347 is semi-prime, meaning it's the product of two primes – and that's not all: it's a product of "cousin primes" that differ by only 4. The last such year was 1517, and the next is 4757.
Even the next product of consecutive primes is a long way off – that's 2491.