We've wasted five years in this country, and will waste many more, on Brexit, whose sole purpose was to resolve an internal dispute in the Conservative Party.
Years we could have spent addressing our real, existential crisis, the threat to the living systems that keep us alive.
Sometimes I wonder whether such cosmic self-indulgence, this profligacy with time even as it was running out, was a way of avoiding the real issues government should have been addressing. A giant displacement activity.
People will look back on this age (if anyone still has the means or time to look back) with incredulity. "They were obsessing over THAT when they should have been dealing with THIS? You have to be kidding!"
And the same applies to the whole culture. The utter trivia that dominates the news, the national obsessions with baking, dancing, celebrity, sport at the expense of everything else, the disputes splitting the Labour Party: all the while the sand is running through our fingers.
It's as the whole nation has been sedated by frivolity and pointless argument, as a disaster of unimaginable proportions approaches. A handful of people are doing everything they can to wake us up, slapping our cheeks, pouring cold water, but we just push them away.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I know the risks involved, but I swim in rivers most days, as I love it so much. Until now, I’ve been lucky. But after a dip in the Thames yesterday, I’ve spent a night and a day throwing up. Thanks for all the💩@thameswater.
I wish I could say, "so long and thanks for all the 💩"
But that would mean my water gets cut off. The promise of privatisation was that if we didn’t like the service, we could take our business elsewhere. But the only way of changing your water provider is to move house.
The water companies enjoy private monopolies, and exploit them ruthlessly, aided by the deregulation agenda of successive governments. Since 1989, they’ve extracted at least £56bn in dividends. All this is money that should have been used to upgrade the system.
Why is it easier to imagine the end of the world than the end of capitalism?
Because capitalism itself is difficult to imagine.
Most people struggle to define it.
Its champions disguise its true nature.
So let's imagine something easier: the end of concentrated wealth.
Thread/
After all, capitalism is the means, concentrated wealth is the end.
Capitalism is the tool used to concentrate wealth.
Inequality drives the collapse of Earth systems.
The impacts of the wealthy and the companies they control are massively greater than those of ordinary people.
Let’s focus on what is tangible: the extreme inequality pushing us towards destruction, while simultaneously causing grostesque social injustice.
Let’s demand wealth taxes high enough to break the spiral of accumulation and create a fairer and greener society.
Because antivaxx sentiment is strong in some of the circles I move in, I’m seeing people go down like flies. Fit, strong, healthy people getting hospitalised, while recklessly endangering the lives of others.
Please friends, get vaccinated.
I’ve had several interesting conditions.
Including cancer and cerebral malaria
I’ve been stung into a coma by hornets
Severely assaulted
Blue-lighted with hypothermia
Almost drowned
Been pronounced clinically dead
But I’ve never taken as long to recover as I did from Covid-19
20 years ago, futurologists were going on about "Living on Thin Air" and the "Weightless Economy". Digitisation would do away with the need for material resources. It was always magical thinking. But now the brutal reality is really hitting home. theguardian.com/technology/202…
The media sucked it up like a sponge, uncritically promoting the idea that future growth would have scarcely any environmental cost. Some of us called it out as BS (Anita Roddick was especially good at doing so). We were, of course, dismissed as "doomsters".
Magical thinking is a common trait among both economists and journalists. It's a result of being detached from material realities (such as planetary boundaries): realities they reduce to abstractions and then airily dismiss.
These are extremely dangerous people.
This week's column tells the outrageous and shocking story of how a community that took the government at its word spent £800,000 and thousands of unpaid hours on improving its town, only to have the ground sold from under its feet. theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
It shows that for all the grand talk of people taking back control, and having a "right to build" and a "right to bid", all that counts is private money. Property developers can sweep the whole lot away with a stroke of the pen.
I very much hope that the people of Totnes, after so much back-breaking work, will find a resolution. Much now depends on @SaputoInc and its response to their request. @AtmosTotnes