Why are interest rates so low 101? - In this primer I will focus on the principal drivers of interest rates and discuss the impact of central bank purchases
I believe that without the incredible bond buying done by the Fed interest rates would be much lower NOT higher
I know this is counter intuitive but if you look at Japan and Europe where bond buying has been less than in the US, interest rates are lower because economic performance has been worse. In Japan the major secular pressure started sooner and in Europe it has been bad lately
So what drives interest rates. Growth, inflation and risk premium. If you have read risk premium 101 you know that Fed a purchases do lower risk premiums. That has kept pressure on rates for sure. BUT it's not the big story.
Long term trend growth depends on two major forces. 1. Population growth and 2. Productivity. Essentially people work to consume The more people and the better they are at working the more GDP
Population growth is in a permanent down trend
And while certainly there is room for emerging market citizens to "work better" productivity has been basically stable for decades
So bond prices have had huge secular headwinds for many decades and this is why real interest rates are low and are highly unlikely to rise. 10 year real rates are at an all time low since 1997 when they first began trading
Nominal interest rates are also low because inflation has had a secular decline. I have posted an article on dampedspringadvisoors.com of my view about inflation back in March when there was a full blown inflation panic. Called "Inflation and why it's likely transitory"
Inflation has popped this year but the secular pressure remains
So nominal rates are also very low and likely to stay low
The Fed has certainly bought a bunch of bonds and risk premiums have been squeezed. But that is a small thing. What matters is the secular pressures. Without the Fed purchases the risk premium portion of yield would be higher. But the economy would have been drastically worse
Growth would be well below trend, employment would be worse, and inflation would be zero or negative. That adds up to much lower rates. You can disagree on whether the Fed "Should" buy bonds. But it's hard to disagree about the impact on rates and the economy.
Oops. Tailwind
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Us naive Americans dont think about currency returns as part of our portfolios as we have the biggest and for decades best place to invest in equities.
Every other global investor cares about currency returns at basic level for their investing
The basic idea for investors or all nationalities should be simple and obvious to all. But we Americans just haven't had to care. Maybe we still don't but at least we should be aware. This 101 will explain what is obvious to all non Americans and then show how it works
The goal of all investors is simple. We want to maximize the risk adjusted return of our investments in the currency we expect to spend in the future.
As Americans we want to maximize our USD returns
If we are Japanese we want to maximize our Yen returns
Money creation and credit creation in the private sector 101 part 2.
Role of Repo.
In the prior thread I outline credit creation which can happen without banks and money creation which requires banks.
I also hinted at bank reserves role as being one of grease to the
system and NOT necessary for bank money creation but necessary for interbank deposit shifts. I also didn't discuss base money creation from the Fed and won't be dealing with that in this thread either.
Here I will discuss the specific role of Repo in today's financial system
The big takeaway is it is one of many important and necessary means of credit creation AND it has no role in money creation unless a bank is a party to the transaction.
That will take some weedy mechanics to prove. But before we do that let's talk about the entire economy
Money creation and credit creation in the private sector 101
There has been a lot of focus on the repo market lately. I get it. It's an important part of the capital markets in the credit creation process. But its growth and contraction is part of the credit creation process
The repo market where transactions are between hedge funds and money market investors, and those who desire leverage for whatever purpose is an important market in the credit creation process BUT is not part of the money creation process UNLESS a commercial bank or the Fed is
A party to the transaction. Because this is largely misunderstood by even some plumbing experts it's worth it for me to write out my understanding (maybe im wrong which would be awesome so I can learn). So here I go.
I've been studying various versions of balance sheet expansions over my career. I'd classify them as
Japanese first failed effort
UK's version
U.S. Version 1
U.S. version 2
ECB version
Japanese all in version 2
They are all fairly different in approach. The big takeaway 🧵
The developing Fed version that most are excited about is most akin to the Japanese first failed effort.
Here's a rough summary of each
In 2001-2006 Japan the BOJ initiated QE. In their version they offered significant lending to the Japanese banking system for good collateral
The balance sheet doubled in size at a pace of 35 Tn yen per year. However of that 35tn only 5 was direct asset purchase and most of that was Japanese Tbills. This is very similar to the BTFP program from SVB time and the current SRF. It was also sorta similar to ECB LTRO
Why do repo rates change and what do they have to do with reserves. This is a super technical issue and there are better folks to follow on this topic than me but I'll give it a go.
Firstly what are the two sides of a repo transaction and why do they want to interact.
One side is a guy with a bank deposit he wants to earn interest on. The other is a guy who wants to borrow money overnight and has assets he owns that he is willing to provide as collateral to the loan. We can go down a level on each side but for now let's keep it simple.
Most repo transactions are done with UST as the collateral and most UST collatarel used is TBills but. UST's are also highly common collateral but do to the marked to market risk they offer less borrowing capacity per unit of notional (higher haircut)
Some thoughts on 10 year notes since Powell guided for a restart of the cutting cycle at Jackson Hole. Trying to answer what the bond market is saying
Nominal yields have fallen 33bp
Note yields are driven lower by
1)Falling real GDP expectations
2)Falling Inflation expectations 3) Falling "risk" of owning assets 4) Improving supply/demand balance vs expectations.
In attributing nominal yield changes to these 4 things unfortunately market prices don't
Easily demonstrate these things. For instance 3&4 are only able to be measured via a model which estimates risk premiums or the expected return over holding cash
Even Breakeven inflation and real TIPS yields have risk premium buried in there market yields. However we can try