Santa Claus Rally 101. As the Yuletide season approaches I want to express my view that Santa exists some times and this year is one of those times. The Santa Claus Rally is strong outperformance of equities particularly the best performers of the year through year end.
While there are many theories of why this happens or if it exists at all. I believe there are two real world drivers. The first one generates buying flows. The second limits selling
In years when the market has had strong performance funds that have underperformed are forced into the market and chase both the overall market and the best performing stocks. This generates buying flows
Since 1928 when stocks are up 10% by Nov 1 buying stocks that day generates an average return of 4.68% with a max return of 14% and a positive return 83% of the time. The max loss is 2.01% and when a loss occurs the average loss is 0.60%. 36 observations exist. Santa is real!
Secondly as the year end approaches it makes little sense to crystallize a capital gain by selling the market or the best performers. Better to sell in January than sell in December. There is one exception which may be relevant this year but is unlikely to be relevant
When capital gains taxes are increased it makes sense to realize a capital gain when the rate on that gain is lower vs holding and realizing the gain when rates are higher. The Dem's Budget Plan includes an increase in capital gains taxes and could put coal in Xmas stockings.
However when the budget was originally proposed the capital gain rate was retroactive. It would be fairly unlikely that a bill passed in 2021 would shift the rate increase to 2022. I could be wrong and will follow this closely as Santa doesn't get going this early anyway
Nonetheless performance chasing generating buying and delayed capital gain realization causing less selling have historically been powerful forces. I expect this year to be no different
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
On Thursday one of these two Fed Nowcast models is going to be wrong. Of course the Wall Street Sheep Consensus straddles both. Why are these models so different?
The NYFRM (and St. Louis fed fwiw) have a 2.5% Q1 GDP Nowcast and Atlanta has a -40bp Nowcast
We won't go through all the math but DSData and @DanielSimonyi and I have been working through the problem and these are our rough findings. The difference is based on the models.
Both models use the same data as it is released including hard and soft data. Atlanta is bottoms up and NY is top down.
Atlanta takes each piece of data as it's released and adds it up. NY starts with some sort of momentum driven spot GDP and adjusts that number based on the
Lots of folks think that choosing to NOT term out the debt is a bet by the treasury on interest rates. In other words keep financing in bills until long term interest rates decline and THEN issue longer term.
I totally get that idea but want to look
at the numbers a bit.
The first thing one has to ask is what is the end game of the Treasury debt composition if the current composition is undesired and is being held for market timing reasons
The second thing one has to consider is whether the "waiting" has a cost as if
waiting is free then why not wait?
The last thing is what is the benefit if the treasury times the market correctly?
As a caveat this is way more complex than what my napkin math will describe and the timing can backfire or end up being more beneficial depending on how the
Completely off the cuff here I have to say I see two things as possible.
Trump wants to lower interest rates to achieve his political goals
Trump has such a massive ego that he believes he could do a better job than the Fed in
Achieving the Fed's dual mandate and firing Powell and replacing him with a puppet would allow Trump to manage policy better for America and its future.
I think the latter case is a legitimate possibility. He may really think this. Maybe he can manage monetary policy better
But the next president may not be as well equipped as Trump. I mean is anyone as awesome as our glorious leader? Well when he dies and leaves office 10 or 20 years from now the next guy will be in charge of monetary policy by precedent.
Post QT end - reserves evolutions thoughts 101. The idea the Fed has for the future of bank reserves in an "ample" regime is reserves are correlated to GDP. The basic idea I guess is because reserves are the medium of exchange between private sector banks when customers
of different banks transact with each other(for private sector investment and consumption activity)or the federal reserve (for tax payments, repo, and debt market transactions including primary issuance), Each of these transactions represent a movement of reserves between banks
or between banks and the Fed. "indexing" "ample" to the GDP suggests the size of the transactions increase proportionate to the GDP and perhaps the frequency of the transactions is somehow linked to GDP (probably by the growth in economic "population"). anyhow thats the Fed's
The Xverse is awash with nonsense regarding a grand bargain called the Mar A Lago Accord. While I accept that anything is possible with the right set of sticks and carrots I cannot imagine such a deal occuring. Nonetheless I will
analyze it here in this thread.
What problem is the MALA solving? The basic idea is that the Trump Administration wants to rebalance global trade to favor domestic production. This is a totally reasonable goal. Let's describe the tactics to achieve that goal outlined in MALA
As the U.S. is a country that has relatively expensive costs of production vs the ROW it imports much more of its goods consumption than it exports. To shift the balance of trade toward U.S. production foreign production needs to become more expensive for consumers the easiest
Marking Treasury's Gold to Market 101 inspired by @DannyDayan5
So as many know the U.S. Treasury owns 8000 Metric tons of gold and for balance sheet purposes it is marked at $42.
If the Treasury decided to "sell its gold" to the Fed at market
Or better lend its gold to the Fed for cash in the TGA it could conceptually do that. The Fed would credit the Treasury General account with roughly 700BN in fresh cash. While the Treasury couldn't "spend" that cash because fiscal spending is a legislative function
It could use the cash to retire or repurchase debt. Presumably they would likely use it to reduce bills outstanding by 700Bn but I guess could also use it to reduce coupon issuance or fund outstanding buybacks. Let's play through the plumbing