One of the most interesting but now forgotten powerful and charismatic men from the Italian Wars was the Swiss cardinal Matthäus Schiner. A close ally to the Pope and fiercely anti-French, this war-loving cardinal inspired and rallied his fellow Swiss countrymen to fight!
The Swiss had already successfully defended their homeland and were famed as the best mercenaries in Europe, but Matthäus Schiner had big imperial ambitious for them. He wanted the feared and admired Swiss to become a premier warrior race in service of the Church of the Pope!
This ambitious bishop of Sion was made Bishop of Novara and cardinal in 1511, and in 1512 he was a Papal legate. Shiner was crucial in mobilizing the Swiss to drive the French out of Milan, resulting in one of their most humiliating defeats in history of France at Novara in 1513.
In 1515 he rallied the Swiss again against the French at Marignano, despite the French offering the Swiss a lot of gold to retreat and a lot of Swiss already leaving because of it. Schiner and the remaining Swiss faced the French again in a brutal battle that lasted for two days!
Despite being outnumbered the Swiss were on the verge of winning until the French were aided by their Venetian allies and won the battle. Shiner's power faded after this loss and so did the Swiss ambitions to engage in wars in foreign countries other than mercenary service.
The aftermath of the defeat of Marignano was in many ways the start of the famous Swiss neutrality. But history could have been very different if the ambitious Shiner was successful at Marignano.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It's crazy how Americans bought the myth that during the time of Columbus people thought that the earth was flat, a complete lie popularized by quasi-historian Washington Irving in 1828.
This globe was literally made before Columbus' discovery, and has no America on it.
Washington Irving completely invented a fictional dialogue between Columbus and the Council of Salamanca, where the clergy supposedly objected him on the ground that the earth was flat.
His fraudulent book would become the most popular book on Columbus in English-speaking world.
This lie was then picked on in America and expended as some sort of anti-Catholic anti-medieval founding myth, where Columbus was supposedly representing enlightenment rationalism against irrationality and dogmatism of the Church.
The idea that monarchy and republic are opposed to each other is a modern thing.
The term republic (res publica) was often used to describe medieval kingdoms.
Even by 16th century the Kingdom of France was still called both a republic and a monarchy at the same time!
The Kingdom of France defined itself by the phrase of "chose publique" (res publica) from 1350s to 1580s, also using the word respublique, to describe the relation between the King of France and his subject.
The term was then replaced by State (État).
The absolutist French monarchy which emerged in 17th century preferred the term State over republic, and talked of the "good of the State".
However the term state also comes from earlier medieval concepts like status regis at regni (the state of the king and the kingdom).
16th century Romans developed an interesting tradition of "talking statues", attaching anonymous political commentary on statues.
The Pasquino was the first of such statues.🧵
The Pasquino is an old statue in Rome dating back to Antiquity.
It was one of many random statues in Rome until early 16th century when Cardinal Oliveiro Carafa decorated the statue with Latin epigrams on the occasion of the Feast of Saint Mark.
The Cardinal's actions unintentionally inspired ordinary Roman people to start writing satirical poems and attaching them to the Pasquino.
It is speculated that these were first only consisting of lowbrow humor, but they soon began including controversial political criticism!