The Met Police officer who kidnapped and murdered Sarah Everard used Covid-19 laws to carry out a bogus arrest of the 33yo, the Old Bailey has heard.
He was carrying an array of police equipment and posing as an undercover cop when he handcuffed and captured her.
PC Wayne Couzens, an officer who was heavily in debt and contemplating leaving the Met, had made preparations for the crimes he was about to commit, including buying a spare key for his handcuffs.
Sarah Everard was walking home from dinner with a friend when she was kidnapped.
Couzens went out that night with a plan: to hunt for a lone woman that he could kidnap and rape.
He drove around Kensington, Earl's Court, and towards Lavender Hill in a circular route, before eventually coming across Ms Everard.
The kidnapping was witnessed by a woman driving home with her husband, who saw Ms Everard being handcuffed in the 'rear stack' position by a confident looking Couzens, who then put her in the back of his car. Ms Everard was 'compliant' and appeared to believe it was a real arrest
Couzens is in the dock for today's sentencing hearing.
He has sat with his head firmly bowed throughout proceedings so far, shuffling in and out of court while flanked by three guards.
The sentence is going to be passed tomorrow.
Couzens has maintained a determined silence over the exact circumstances of the rape and murder.
Ms Everard's family and friends, as well as police and prosecutors, are still in the dark on when and where she was killed.
The court is hearing detailed evidence of Couzens' activities after Sarah Everard's murder.
He stopped for a Costa hot chocolate and bakewell tart after dumping the body and before returning the hire car.
He threw her phone into a flood relief channel, then went home and resumed his family duties including rearranging his children's dental appointment.
The next day, Couzens bought petrol to burn the body, and left it alight as he went off to do other things.
He found time to seek anxiety treatment for the family dog, while buying builders' bags to take Ms Everard's body to a pond.
Couzens then emailed his police supervisor, asking to be removed from firearms duties due to stress over a pay dispute.
On March 7, Couzens took his wife and children to the same woods where he had burned Ms Everard's body.
During the family trip, he allowed his children to play near to the pond where her body had been dumped.
Sarah's family have delivered powerful impact statements to the court hearing.
Both father Jeremy and sister Katie demanded Couzens look at them as they spoke, though the killer could not bring himself to fully lift his head.
Susan Everard, Sarah's mother, said she is "haunted by the horror" of what happened, and lets out a silent scream each night while imagining the kidnapping:
"Don't get in the car, Sarah, don't believe him. Run!"
Mr Everard said Couzens would get "no redemption", and Katie Everard branded the PC a "monster".
"I am horrified by your ability to flit between what you did and normal everyday actions"
Couzens will return to court tomorrow, when his barrister will offer mitigation.
Sentence is expected to be passed tomorrow.
A whole life order is being considered.
Family of Sarah Everard demand that killer PC looks them in the eye, as they reveal the horrific impact of the murder: standard.co.uk/news/crime/fam…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
These are some of the words offered in mitigation for PC Wayne Couzens, as he faces sentencing for the murder of Sarah Everard.
His barrister argued that a life sentence, but not a whole life sentence, should be imposed, and Couzens is likely to die in prison either way.
"He makes no excuses for his actions, he accepts he will receive and deserves a severe punishment.
“No right-minded person reading the papers or listening to the statements read out by the Everard family could feel anything other than revulsion for what he did.
"He doesn't seek to make excuses for anything he did. He is filled with self-loathing and abject shame and he should be.
There is little mitigation and deserves and expects nothing less than a life sentence."
The Judicial Review and Courts Bill poses a massive threat to #openjustice particularly coverage of magistrates court proceedings.
You wouldn't know it from the official press release, relegating these changes to "a range of other courts measures" in the footnotes.
What is being proposed will be music to the ears of defendants who'd rather no one knew they've been accused of a crime
Don't fancy appearing in open court hearing to face the charge, indicate a plea, and for the case to be sent to the crown court? No problem, that's all covered
The new Bill, if passed, allows for:
- indications of plea to be given in writing
- allocation of trial to magistrate or crown courts to be done administratively
- committals to crown court without a hearing, if guilty plea indicated.
HMCTS will answer questions raised at its court safety webinar by the end of next week (Jan 29).
Many questions on ventilation, cleaning, listing policy, remote hearings, remote juries have been raised.
Also some personal experiences shared:
QC says: I'm currently involved in a murder trial where there are approx 30 people in a courtroom with no fresh air. Is that considered safe in respect of the transmission of Covid 19?
Answer: Ventilation is a red line...if as reported that would not be compliant with standards.
Q: This all sounds very good but the reality is these measures are not adhered to. There is no sanction for refusal to wear masks at court. Should judges treat an unjustified refusal it as a contempt?
A: Security guards at courts have powers to enforce rules
Lockdown breach prosecutions are largely done behind closed doors in London. Most people don't know they're happening. The public aren't told about them.
I've looked into the case of three men & a woman caught having beers together in the park on April 18 to shed a bit of light.
First off, these are Single Justice Procedure cases dealt with on the papers alone. No open hearing, no prosecutor, no defence lawyer, just a magistrate & legal advisor using the documents put in front of them to take decisions.
These four people were spotted by police in Brent Park on April 18, drinking beer in a 'den' at a time when everyone had to stay at home unless you had a reasonable excuse to be out and about.
There's nothing to suggest these people weren't in breach of the coronavirus laws.
Curious goings-on at Westminster magistrates in prosecutions for breaking the first coronavirus lockdown:
- Convictions for offences ppl weren't prosecuted for
- Hefty fines handed out which may exceed the legal maximum
- Police allowed to try again when paperwork is botched
Westminster mags is using the Single Justice Procedure for these cases, behind-closed-doors with just a magistrate & legal advisor present to deal with them 'on the papers'.
I'm happy to report the #OpenJustice issues I highlighted have been looked into, the court has apologised and promised things will be different in the future.
The paperwork now I've seen, however, raises some brand-new questions.
Lord Chief Justice says he hopes for 300 courts by end of December that could run simultaneous jury trials.
Crown Courts running flat out next year could chip away around 50 cases a week from the backlog, he says.
"It will nonetheless take a long time to recover the backlog"
LCJ says he would be "disappointed" to put it mildly if there wasn't funding from the Treasury next year to allow courts to run at full capacity.
Acknowledges criminal cases coming in are more complex, and the new influx of CPS lawyers and police officers will add to the backlog
Extended opening hours pilot - LCJ says it's made a "modest contribution" so far, and it's not clear whether they help to increase volume of cases heard or not.
"It isn't obvious, and depends very much on the nature of cases being dealt with on that level".