We have known as far back as 1982 that tracking calories, food logging is inaccurate & doesn’t predict weight loss
10.1093/ajcn/35.4.727.
2/n
Meta-analysis in 2008 by Harnack and French, then follow-up in 2014 from Eblel, Kiszko reviews and assesses the evidence on the effectiveness of calorie labeling at the point of purchase
"Concerns on the effectiveness of calorie labeling policies"
10.1007/s10900-014-9876-0
3/n
Less than 0.1% of people getting fast food actually care about calories...
10.2105/AJPH.2008.136457
4/n
Men actually INCREASE intake with calorie information
10.1186/1479-5868-5-63
5/n
nutritional labeling in a college setting caused some people to eat more....
10.1016/0271-5317(95)02001-C
6/n
dietitians miscalculate calories by 10-20%, lay people around 20-30% and some patients with obesity up to 50%
10.1016/s0002-8223(02)90316-0
7/n
Head to head, calorie counting performs worse than EVEN the low fat diet (the diet that failed the last half century)
10.1136/bmj.314.7073.29
8/n
There are millions of people with access to calorie information with no END in sight to the obesity pandemic
9/n
Many patients actually DONT like tracking or counting calories
10.1016/j.invent.2016.12.003
10/n
There's more
11/n
SUMMARY:
Calorie estimation for both intake & expenditure are inaccurate, even for orthorexic dietitians/trainers
Several real-world examples from NYC, college cafeterias, menus etc have shown that calorie information has no clear positive impact on food intake
11/n
Educating patients on calories has been an overall disastrous experiment with no signs of real world improvement
Calorie counting and point tracking diets HAVE never been shown to be superior to ANY approach
Consider stopping the bullshit & actually helping people instead
/end
If you want to hear me lecture on this join me this Saturday for a Grand Rounds for @TheSMHP@DougieReynolds
We will discuss why calories NEVER mattered and the history & importance of glycemic variability...
Making America Healthy and reversing obesity, without drugs & injections
By focusing only on metabolic health, patients lost 15.5% of their weight while STOPPING unnecessary medications
👇🏻👇🏻
50 patients
⬇️43lbs on average ‼️
💥~15.5% weight loss at one year💥
🤔 Majority of patients KEPT losing weight even after stopping GLP1
🤔 Even at 1 year, 76% of patients were STILL losing weight - BUSTING THE MYTH that “patients can’t adhere to diets longterm”
I’ll walk you through why some of this is REALLY important
This paper looks at the 1 year weight loss results from our virtual metabolic health program with CGMs, smart equipment, an app and virtual coaches.
Please RT, bookmark & share this link 🔗 to spread awareness so doctors know the power of metabolic health and lifestyle changes NOT only pushing medications 💊
🧵/THREAD
🤌Allow me to set the stage.
The current accepted truths in medicine is that GLP1 meds have unprecedented results and there is no other options because “all diets fail”
But have medical teams actually tried to help patients adhere ? 🤔
They haven’t. Why? Because it’s easier to prescribe injection weight loss drugs than to promote & inspire lifestyle change
But the sad reality is many patients cannot tolerate the injection drugs due to side effects while many others don’t actually need it.
If every patient with obesity and diabetes goes on these injection drugs corporate America and Medicare will go bankrupt from the trillion dollar burden it would cost.
So our clinic aimed for better.
A completely new care model called TOWARD
And how did we do?
We created a multi-modal approach to metabolic health leveraging telemedicine, convenience and real-time access to doctors and coaches who actually care because they have lived it!
We created a unique app
We leveraged smart scales, CGMs and remotely monitored blood pressure cuffs to help predict weight loss and intervene in real-time before weight regain occurred
Everything you need to know about gallstones as it relates to diet and dietary composition.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
In the obese during rapid weight loss from a very low-calorie diet, a relatively high fat intake could prevent gallstone formation, probably by maintaining an adequate gallbladder emptying, which could counterbalance lithogenic mechanisms
On the basis of a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, during weight loss, UDCA and/or higher dietary fat content appear to prevent the formation of gallstones.
I have a serious problem with the term “pre-diabetes.”
The prefix “pre” is used to describe what comes before something.
In reality, “pre”-diabetes is actually AFTER or “post” 15 years of the high insulin levels & inflammation associated with the modern lifestyle.
Prediabetes is usually diagnosed by checking an a1c level, which is the percentage of hemoglobin that binds to sugar as a percentage of normal hemoglobin.
If you a1c is between 5.7 and 6.4, you are considered to have “pre-diabetes”
To achieve this level of pre-diabetes, you must sustain enough carbohydrate/glycemic excursions & weight gain where your average glucose rises sufficiently above normal levels.
The a1c describes your speed, your are past your speed limit.
“I want to paint a picture of how corrupt our medical system is.”
Doctors, the traditional gatekeepers of health and wellness, have abandoned their role as advocates for patients in favor of compliance with a system that rewards volume over value. This shift has eroded the foundations of trust, compassion, and accountability that once defined the doctor-patient relationship. Over the past several decades, the profession has devolved into a series of disconnected, transactional encounters, leaving patients sicker and doctors disillusioned.
The tragedy is that this decline wasn’t inevitable. It is a failure born of choices… choices made by physicians, healthcare administrators, and policymakers who prioritized financial gain over human well-being. Doctors, rather than rising above the constraints imposed by insurance companies and dogmatic guidelines, have allowed themselves to be reduced to cogs in a profit-driven machine.
The results speak for themselves: skyrocketing rates of chronic disease, polypharmacy as the default treatment, and a complete abandonment of empathy and rapport as tools for healing.
The Shackles of Insurance and Dogma
Accepted insurance contracts have transformed healthcare into an assembly line, where the primary objective is to maximize RVUs rather than optimize patient outcomes. Physicians are incentivized to see as many patients as possible within an eight-hour day, often spending less than 15 minutes with each person. In this time, they must review charts, check boxes, and meet pre-approved insurance guidelines—leaving little room for meaningful conversations or root-cause analysis.
Motivational interviewing, a cornerstone of behavioral change, is nearly nonexistent in this environment. Listening to a patient’s story… truly hearing their struggles, fears, and goals… has been replaced with a perfunctory review of symptoms and a prescription pad. When the system demands efficiency above all else, the doctor’s role shifts from healer to bureaucrat.
But this isn’t just about time constraints. The deeper issue is the abdication of intellectual curiosity. Doctors have become so entrenched in dogmatic guidelines that they no longer question whether those guidelines are effective. Lifelong learning, once a hallmark of the medical profession, has been reduced to obligatory continuing medical education (CME) credits, which often reinforce the very guidelines that perpetuate the problem. The result? A workforce of physicians who are well-versed in polypharmacy but blind to the tenets of metabolic health.
The Forgotten Tenets of Metabolic Health
Metabolic health is the foundation of human health, yet it remains one of the most neglected aspects of modern medicine. Simple, evidence-based strategies like reducing ultra-processed foods, improving sleep, managing stress, and encouraging movement are rarely discussed in primary care settings. Instead, doctors reach for sleeping pills, antidepressants, and, most recently, anorexic injections like GLP1s.
The medical system’s reliance on pharmaceuticals as a first-line solution reflects a broader failure to address root causes. It is easier to prescribe a pill than to engage in the hard, messy work of behavior change. But this convenience comes at a cost. Patients remain trapped in a cycle of dependency, their symptoms managed but their underlying conditions ignored.
The neglect of metabolic health is not just a failure of individual doctors; it is a systemic failure. Medical schools dedicate minimal time to nutrition education, and residency programs prioritize acute care over preventative strategies. The result is a generation of physicians ill-equipped to address the chronic diseases that now dominate their practices.
The Crisis in Medicine - Part 3/3 🧵
Accountability in Medicine: A Missing Standard
One of the most glaring deficiencies in modern medicine is the absence of accountability. Unlike other high-stakes professions, doctors are rarely held to measurable standards of success. There is no quarterly or annual evaluation of patient outcomes, no system to reward exceptional care or address poor performance. The only metrics that matter are RVUs and salary, both of which incentivize quantity over quality.
This lack of accountability is particularly striking when compared to other fields. If airplanes were falling out of the sky, we would hold pilots, maintenance crews, and engineers accountable. We would investigate every failure, implement corrective measures, and ensure that it never happened again. Yet in medicine, where the stakes are equally high, there is no such culture of responsibility. Doctors who consistently produce poor outcomes face little consequence, and those who achieve exceptional results receive no recognition.
Without accountability, there is no incentive for improvement. Physicians have no reason to question their practices, explore new approaches, or challenge the status quo. They become complacent, and patients suffer the consequences.
The Erosion of Empathy and Community Leadership
Perhaps the most tragic aspect of modern medicine is the loss of empathy and human connection. The role of the doctor as a community leader, a neighbor, and a trusted confidant has been replaced by a faceless bureaucracy. Patients are no longer seen as individuals with unique stories and struggles; they are cases to be managed, codes to be billed, and data points to be entered into an electronic medical record.
Empathy, once the cornerstone of medical practice, has been sacrificed on the altar of efficiency. Doctors no longer have time to listen, let alone build rapport. Motivational interviewing—a simple yet powerful tool for fostering behavior change—is rarely practiced. Instead, patients are met with a litany of prescriptions and referrals, each one a tacit acknowledgment of the doctor’s inability (or unwillingness) to engage on a deeper level.
This loss of empathy is not just a personal failing; it is a systemic issue. The medical system actively discourages doctors from forming meaningful connections with their patients. Time spent listening and understanding is time that cannot be billed. And so, doctors learn to suppress their humanity in order to meet the demands of the system.
Should Doctors Be to Blame?
Absolutely. While the system bears much of the responsibility, doctors themselves must also be held accountable. They have allowed their profession to be co-opted by insurance companies, pharmaceutical giants, and hospital administrators. They have accepted the constraints of RVUs and dogmatic guidelines without protest. And in doing so, they have failed their patients.
It is tempting to absolve doctors of blame, to view them as victims of a broken system. But this perspective ignores the agency that every physician possesses. Doctors have the power to question, to challenge, and to change. They have the power to demand better for their patients and for themselves. But too many choose the path of least resistance, prioritizing financial gain and professional convenience over the hard work of advocacy and reform.
If doctors don’t take ownership of their failures, why should patients? If physicians are not willing to rise above the system, to challenge its shortcomings and demand accountability, then they are complicit in the harm it causes.
The Crisis in Medicine - Part 2/3 🧵
The Path Forward: Reclaiming the Role of the Doctor
The path forward begins with a fundamental redefinition of what it means to be a doctor. Physicians must reclaim their role as healers, advocates, and community leaders. They must rise above the constraints of insurance and dogma to prioritize what truly matters: the health and well-being of their patients.
This requires a commitment to lifelong learning, intellectual curiosity, and accountability. Doctors must be willing to question the guidelines they follow, to explore alternative approaches, and to measure their success not by RVUs but by patient outcomes. They must embrace empathy, rapport, and motivational interviewing as essential tools of their trade.
Above all, doctors must take ownership of their failures. They must acknowledge the harm caused by their complacency and commit to doing better. Only then can they begin to rebuild the trust and respect that have been lost.
The time for excuses is over. The medical system is broken, but it is not beyond repair. Doctors have the power to lead the way, to demand change, and to redefine what it means to practice medicine. The question is whether they will rise to the challenge… or continue to fall short.