I don’t write much about broadcast journalism but I'm fascinated by the questions about news values raised by the BBC’s refusal to report or discuss the @PeterStefanovi2 viral video of Boris Johnson lies. There’s been a small development... 1/9
I wrote this article (below) saying that, given what I and others (inc ITV and Sky) considered to be the obvious newsworthiness of Stefanovic's film, I could only conclude that the BBC had blacklisted him. 2/9 bylinetimes.com/2021/09/03/the…
Struck by the failure of the entire BBC news system (national, international, regional, local, TV, radio online...) to report about it, I asked the BBC, and they got back to assure me that there was no instruction to staff in relation to the video, and no ban. 3/9
So I wrote to BBC Radio Northampton asking if, given there was apparently no ban, they planned to cover a film made by someone living near Northampton which had had more than 35 million views on Twitter. 4/9
I also asked whether, if they didn’t plan to report this striking local story, they could explain why not. Here comes the small development: I have just had a reply from a ‘publicist for BBC England’ saying on behalf of BBC Radio Northampton that ‘we have nothing to add’. 5/9
This is bizarre and perverse. The local Northampton paper has covered this. So, incidentally, have many overseas broadcasters. The man is famous. But the local BBC radio station won’t say they will do anything and also won’t say how doing nothing might fit their news values. 6/9
To be clear, they aren’t obliged to cover it. It’s just very strange that, barring one brief mention near the end of a BBC website article months ago, not a single department or programme across the whole of the BBC appears to think this story meets their news criteria. 7/9
Have they all independently come to the same decision? Do none of the many news editors working anywhere in the BBC think it would interest their viewers, listeners or readers? How likely is that? 8/9
If the BBC has a valid reason for refusing to discuss or report this video it should surely tell us. If it doesn’t, then let them act like normal journalists. The longer this goes on the worse the Corporation looks. 9/9
Here's the video.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Brian Cathcart

Brian Cathcart Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BrianCathcart

14 Sep
Did you know the Commissioner for Human Rights of the Council of Europe has urged MPs to vote against parts of the Police, Crime Sentencing & Courts Bill and warned it may breach the European Convention on Human Rights? @AdamWagner1 @davidallengreen 1/6
rm.coe.int/letter-to-rt-h…
The letter is dated 1 July but doesn't seem to have had much coverage. The Commissioner's warning should surely carry weight given that the Council of Europe (*not* an EU body) is the continent's leading institutional human rights watchdog. @libertyhq @BBCNews 2/6
Addressing the Speakers of both Houses of Parliament, Commissioner Dunja Mijatović warned that the proposed curbs on protest in the Bill ‘may very well be at variance with Articles 10 and 11 of the ECHR as interpreted by the European Court of Human Rights’. 3/6
Read 6 tweets
18 May
Priti Patel has thrust herself into the formally *independent* business of the *independent* panel on the #DanielMorgan murder, demanding more time to read the report before MPs or the public see it and threatening to black out passages of text. 1/6
Bear in mind that this case is all about corruption. It is the most investigated unsolved murder in UK history because of corruption – corrupt police officers, corrupt journalists, and perhaps others. The panel report has been 8 years in the making. 2/6
That long gestation may itself owe something to corrupt interference with witnesses. We'll see. But we know this: after 34 years of being cheated, the Morgan family deserve from the British state a good, trustworthy report delivered by clean process. 3/6
Read 6 tweets
11 May
Were you frustrated by the ending of #LineOfDuty? Imagine what it's like to fight police corruption in real life for 34 years – and still not have seen your brother's murderers brought to book? Maybe, just maybe, things are going to change for @AlastairMorgan next week. 1/9
After 5 failed investigations, an 'independent panel' has been reviewing the Daniel Morgan case *for 8 years*. It reports on Monday. Has it got to the truth? Or did corruption (which the police have admitted in the past) block the panel's way too? We're about to find out. 2/9
You have almost certainly heard of the case. Daniel Morgan was a private investigator killed with an axe in a pub car park in south London in 1987, possibly on the brink of exposing police wrongdoing. Among the many remarkable things about the case is this. . . 3/9
Read 10 tweets
31 Mar
Leaked to friendly hacks. No prior peer review. It doesn't look as though even the government had much faith its big race report will stand up to scrutiny. 1/4 bylinetimes.com/2021/03/31/rac…
In truth this is no 'commission', just a panel handpicked by the Conservatives to provide a veneer of respectability for their awful slogans of prejudice. No institutional racism? Please. 2/4
This kind of thing is going on across Whitehall – a stampede of inquiries and panels without the slightest whiff of independence to them. And where they don't come up with the 'right' answers ministers just start the process again. 3/4
Read 4 tweets
9 Mar
There is nothing new in what the press is doing to #MeghanAndHarry, though the scale and venom are amazing. They did the same to Caroline Flack – also in the full knowledge that she had mental health problems. There are countless victims. They – and we – deserve better. 1/5
Journalism is supposed to be a force for good, and if we are seeing anything that gives ground for hope today it is those few journalists who are stepping back and saying 'Not in my name'. 2/5
For far too long the 'thugs with press cards' have been indulged by journalists with better instincts. For too long cruelty, bigotry and misogyny have been tolerated, defended and treated as if they were equals to honesty and fairness in the world of journalism. 3/5
Read 5 tweets
10 Feb
Judgment in the latest stage of the breach of privacy and copyright case brought by Meghan, Duchess of Sussex against Associated Newspapers will be handed down tomorrow, Thursday, at 4pm. A short thread on what can happen. #MeghanAndHarry 1/5
It's an application by the Duchess for 'summary judgment', seeking to cut short proceedings on the grounds that, her lawyers claim, Associated's case is so weak there's no need for a trial. 2/5
The judge can find for or against her on both claims (privacy & copyright) or give a partial judgment, 1 in her favour and 1 against. If she wins both it's over. If she wins neither, that is not an overall defeat for her; it means the whole case will proceed to trial. 3/5
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(