If a counterparty in a negotiation refuses to even begin negotiating, there’s little choice left but to move along to the best alternative to a negotiated agreement. That’s not the BIF — which falls short of addressing the climate challenge and other needs. It’s nothing.
If Manchin’s best alternative to a negotiated agreement proves to be nothing as well, we may be stuck. At least we’ll have clarity about that situation, though.
This statement from Manchin illustrates the point. What separates the infrastructure investments in the BIF from the investments in human infrastructure — child care, pre-K, Medicaid expansion — that _directly_ relieve costs that burden the working class?
To drill down: why is it “vengefully tax[ing],” by Manchin’s lights, to revise the tax code so the wealthy no longer pay lower percentages than workers — but not vengeful to impose a work requirement on a *child tax credit* designed to aid the next generation?
The Manchin statement has no substance to engage with; it’s all affect, all show. If that’s all he can offer while expecting House Dems to pass the BIF tomorrow, progressives have no choice but to #TankIt.
To take up another Manchin line, that other Dems “ignore the reality that … families continue pay [sic] an unavoidable inflation tax”: Biden proposes to *remedy* inflation for core costs—child & health care, housing, education. Manchin mistakes the cure for the disease.
Meyer is right: the 49th and 50th votes seem at odds with _each other_, never mind the Dem caucus.
Another example: Manchin named prescription drug price negotiation as a policy, along with the child tax credit, he’s open to including. But Sinema seems categorically opposed:
If Manchin wants to raise some income taxes and negotiate prescription drug prices while Sinema says ix-nay to both, it’s difficult to see how a consensus might eventually develop _between them_. politico.com/news/2021/09/1…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Funny that he should say this; I was just thinking of how Elmo reminds me of a cross between a son of an apartheid emerald miner and a son of a b— [transmission lost]
French wants proof of a negative—that the ride w/ Neely would have ended with no one hurt. But we _know_ that Penny’s preemptive violence caused a man’s death.
It’s the same sort of moral calculus that justified ‘preemptive warfare’ in Iraq, and it remains just as bankrupt.
“No, his WMD program wasn’t nearly as extensive as we thought, but it is fiction to believe his weapons were entirely gone” — right. Same logic: yes, Neely assaulted no one, but it’s fiction to believe that Neely was entirely harmless.
Do some California Democrats treat the housing crisis principally as an opportunity to arbitrage power and financial support for themselves? No. Of course not. That couldn't be.
This is the nonprofit that KDL — already deservedly on the spot for other reasons (more on that in a sec) — took cash from. Just a _really_ savory association for anyone who touches housing policy in Southern California to have.
You might remember previously seeing KDL mentioned in connection with a leak of him saying incredibly bigoted stuff about a fellow L.A. council member's kid: la.streetsblog.org/2022/11/04/the…
There’s always a seat at the punditry table for writers who code as reasonable among themselves because they’re white, male, and non-combative with folks in their peer circle.
Plenty of the rest of us have explained — at length and with citations — why the “abuse” heaped on these obdurately insensate folks is entirely deserved. In the end, though, all that matters is that there’s a club and you’re not in it.