Aristocratic Fury Profile picture
Sep 29, 2021 21 tweets 9 min read Read on X
I think one of the reasons why Swiss were so impressive and looked invincible at the height of their power in 15th and early 16th century is because their fighting style looked very beatable, in theory. This made their opponents do the same mistake again and again... (thread)
The Swiss relied on their pikemen supported by other pole weapons and some crossbowmen and gunners. They were a pretty one-dimensional army in that regard. A "one trick pony"? Yes, but the one who does that trick insanely good and in fact much better than the opponent expects!
Starting with the mighty Burgundian army, the Swiss foes made the mistake of thinking they could finesse their way to beat the Swiss by using a tactical approach that looked clever on paper, but always seemed to fail horribly when they actually faced the Swiss on the battlefield.
Even today, in discussion about hypothetical battles, people imagine that Swiss pikemen could be countered by archer-heavy medieval or even pre-medieval armies, or by tactically more diverse armies like the Romans dealt with Macedonian phallanx by flanking it.
But look at the Burgundian wars (1474-1477). The Burgundian army was the most modernized and well organized army at the time, they had everything. A lot of archers and crossbowmen, a diverse and lethal cavalry, they used gunpowder and early cannons, and they even had their pikes.
So the Burgundian army had plenty of tools to use, and plenty of theoretical tactical approaches to beat the one-dimensional Swiss. Now people might blame their brash leader Charles the Bold, but he generally had the right idea what to do, it's just that he couldn't execute it.
Every time the Burgundians and the Swiss met on the battlefield, the Swiss always managed to catch Burgundians off-guard, swarmed them and dragged them into a dogfight which they won with their insane determination and ferocity. The Burgundians never had a chance to fully deploy.
I think this can be compared to boxing: if you're a tactical fighter and you see another boxer doing well by using very one-dimensional attributes like speed or power and you think you'd easily finesse around it with a disciplined gameplan, jabbing and moving around a lot...
...But then once you get in the ring with this guy, you see that his punches are much quicker and/or stronger than you expected, and most importantly he's determined and won't yield easily. Suddenly, you realize you're in a real dogfight and you have to fight fire with fire.
With the Swiss it was a lot like that. It seems that all of their enemies were surprised at just how quickly and ferociously the Swiss charged at them, how they didn't back off when faced with adversity, and just came to kill and destroy by breaking the enemy's will completely.
This happened to French at Novara in 1513. They had everything, cannons, their famed heavy cavalry, arquebuses, crossbows and their own pikemen Landsknecht mercenaries. But the Swiss just swarmed them with insane infantry charge, caught them off guard and destroyed them.
The Swiss at Novara had basically only infantry, and used their predictable tactic of pikemen charging the enemy in quick and disciplined way. Yet the French with their modernized tactically diverse army simply could not stop it. The Swiss were simply too good at what they did.
So how were the Swiss eventually beaten? Well their enemies realized that to beat the Swiss, you need to fight fire with fire and bring the fight to them. They realized there was no way to tactically finesse around it and avoid the eventual Swiss onslaught.
That's because the Swiss would simply march on even if they faced huge casualties. Their warrior spirit was unmatched and their foes learned that they needed to learn how to match it. The French at Marignano in 1515 and Landsknechts under Frundsberg command finally managed that.
Now by matching the Swiss I don't mean necessarily becoming an equal or even better than Swiss at what they did the best in Europe over night, but to be good enough to sustain the pressure long enough until the tactical superiority of your army would eventually lead to victory.
At Marignano, the French did just that. They were mentally ready for the brutal grueling two day long battle and held their line under pressure until Venetian reinforcements finally tipped the battle in their favor.
The Landsknechts famously imitated the Swiss and eventually reached their level too. Especially under the charismatic leader Frundsberg they were more than willing to engage the Swiss at pike warfare and did not fold under pressure like so many did in front of feared Swiss.
The Swiss really made other European armies raise their level in terms of infantry fighting spirit and discipline. They showed that if you didn't have the true warrior spirit, no tactics or technology would save you in renaissance warfare!
The Swiss, as an individual force that could solely decide battles, were also stopped by the rise of gunpowder. The rise of pike and shot tactics meant that the Swiss would suffer too much casualties advancing at enemy lines without proper backing and tactics.
This famously happened at Bicocca in 1522 where the Spanish-Imperial army used an ultra-defensive approach and decimated the advancing Swiss, who despite this still marched towards the enemy, but were too weakened to overcome them by the time they reached them.
So this is how the Swiss went from being the undisputed top dogs of European open battlefields to becoming just one among many elite units that needed to be complimented by the right army composition and tactics. But their legendary fighting spirit was never forgotten!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Aristocratic Fury

Aristocratic Fury Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LandsknechtPike

Nov 12, 2024
Jan III Sobieski is well known for his victory at Vienna in 1683.

But he had already made his name as a warrior long before that.

On this day 11 November he achieved a great victory against the Ottomans in 1673 at Khotyn.

This is how the Lion of Lechistan was born. 🧵 Image
Image
Image
The Battle of Khotyn happened in the context of the Polish-Ottoman War of 1672-1676.

The said war was started when the Ottomans invaded the lands of Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth in Ukraine with a 80,000 strong army.

This army was led Sultan Mehmed IV and the Grand Vizier. Image
The invaders entered lands that were already devastated by war and faced a much weakened Commonwealth.

The Polish-Cossack-Tatar War of 1666-1671 had just ended and left the Commonwealth exhausted, tired from having to put down the unrest in Ukraine. Image
Image
Image
Read 22 tweets
Oct 14, 2024
It's crazy how Americans bought the myth that during the time of Columbus people thought that the earth was flat, a complete lie popularized by quasi-historian Washington Irving in 1828.

This globe was literally made before Columbus' discovery, and has no America on it. Image
Washington Irving completely invented a fictional dialogue between Columbus and the Council of Salamanca, where the clergy supposedly objected him on the ground that the earth was flat.

His fraudulent book would become the most popular book on Columbus in English-speaking world. Image
This lie was then picked on in America and expended as some sort of anti-Catholic anti-medieval founding myth, where Columbus was supposedly representing enlightenment rationalism against irrationality and dogmatism of the Church.

All based on a total lie. Image
Read 11 tweets
Aug 16, 2024
The idea that monarchy and republic are opposed to each other is a modern thing.

The term republic (res publica) was often used to describe medieval kingdoms.

Even by 16th century the Kingdom of France was still called both a republic and a monarchy at the same time!Image
The Kingdom of France defined itself by the phrase of "chose publique" (res publica) from 1350s to 1580s, also using the word respublique, to describe the relation between the King of France and his subject.

The term was then replaced by State (État).Image
The absolutist French monarchy which emerged in 17th century preferred the term State over republic, and talked of the "good of the State".

However the term state also comes from earlier medieval concepts like status regis at regni (the state of the king and the kingdom).Image
Read 18 tweets
Jun 18, 2024
There are many mysterious legends in the Alps.

People from the village of Gurro believe that they are descendants of Scottish warriors who served the French king at the battle of Pavia in 1525!

It is said that after their retreat the Scots were stuck here due to a blizzard. 🧵

Image
Image
Image
The village of Gurro is situated in Italy close to the border of Switzerland.

The villagers are said to speak a curious dialect and have distinct traditions which they believe originate from their alleged Scottish ancestors.
Image
Image
For example the people of Gurro want to say yes they say aye instead of Italian si.

They also claim that the traditional wooden support under the windows is deliberately shaped to resemble St. Andrew's cross.

Traditional clothes resemble Scottish tartan.Image
Image
Image
Read 21 tweets
May 27, 2024
There are many anonymous accounts here on X.

But how did people post anonymously in the past?

16th century Romans developed an interesting tradition of "talking statues", attaching anonymous political commentary on statues.

The Pasquino was the first of such statues.🧵Image
Image
The Pasquino is an old statue in Rome dating back to Antiquity.

It was one of many random statues in Rome until early 16th century when Cardinal Oliveiro Carafa decorated the statue with Latin epigrams on the occasion of the Feast of Saint Mark.
Image
Image
The Cardinal's actions unintentionally inspired ordinary Roman people to start writing satirical poems and attaching them to the Pasquino.

It is speculated that these were first only consisting of lowbrow humor, but they soon began including controversial political criticism! Image
Read 22 tweets
May 22, 2024
In the Middle Ages there was no word for orange color.

The Westerners only adopted the word for this color in 16th century from the Sanskrit word naranga through Portuguese merchants!

It eventually became associated with the Protestant cause.🧵Image
Image
Image
The medievals adopted the idea from the ancients that there were only seven colors: white, yellow, red, green, blue, purple and black.

These were also the seven heraldic tinctures which were eligible to be used on the coats of arms.

Medieval nobles could not use orange color! Image
But in late 15th and early 16th century the Portuguese merchants brought first orange trees to Europe from Asia!

Suddenly there were fruits in Europe that were of this color orange, for which there was no name yet. Image
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(