@The_Libtarded @americabitches @KamVTV Please tell me the difference in level of risk for you vs a pregnant woman that has pre-eclampsia. Is the risk factor the same for a healthy young 20yo male vs a 65 yo female with MTHFR gene mutation? Who risks more of themsef there? Who is doing more for "their community"?
@The_Libtarded @americabitches @KamVTV 2/ What about the 30yo healthy female vs the 40yo healthy PREGNANT female? What's the risk factor there? Is the vax contraindicated for pregnancy? No. But the woman is on the older side, and maybe she has to use IVF to get pregnant. Wouldn't the LOSS be bigger to her?
@The_Libtarded @americabitches @KamVTV 3/ You can't sit there and tell me you care about the COMMUNITY and then disregard individuals! It is NOT 1-size-fits-all. You're not a bigger hero than the rest of us, simply because you took it and we didn't. YOU are selfish if you demand we sacrifice MORE than you had to!
@The_Libtarded @americabitches @KamVTV 4/ Go ahead and point to the studies where this vaccine was tested on every possible prior health condition and every possible COMBINATION of proof health conditions, and proven safe. Can a person have a thyroid condition and heart damage from an auto accident and get it?
@The_Libtarded @americabitches @KamVTV Point being that the jab is no big deal for some. Bigger deal for others. And the only people who know how big it is are a person and their doctor. THAT is the only moral high ground to be had - each person weighs the risk for themselves and CONSIDERS their community in the math.
@The_Libtarded @americabitches @KamVTV 5/Oh. And thalidomide wasn't FDA approved, sure, but neither was the vaccine until recently. And the FDA approved version, isn't even actually being offered yet. It's a bait and switch by gov and pharma, because the risks don't matter to them. They have to worry about the big pic
@The_Libtarded @americabitches @KamVTV That big pic is: get everyone we can vaccinated. If it causes deaths, that's one less person to infect others. And that doesn't even include their individual stocks in pharma, etc Government isn't altruistic. But when it is, it is in the most brutal way-see above "one less"

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with PrinciplePondering

PrinciplePondering Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PrinciplePonde2

30 Sep
@The_Libtarded @americabitches @KamVTV I'M disingenuine? Lol No. I actually listen to Pele about why they don't want the vax. You ignore them and assume your risk v benefit calculation of others is accurate. You're so ignorant, and arrogant, about things you haven't looked into
@The_Libtarded @americabitches @KamVTV But you're right in some ways. I don't usually call people selfish that are encouraging the vax, because I don't believe that's true, necessarily. I was saying it to prove a point: that maybe those assumptions are wrong and way off base.
@The_Libtarded @americabitches @KamVTV 2/ I think you are ignorant. Not stupid, not unable to comprehend, not sind bad thing. Ignorant, as in lacking some knowledge. You categorize and stereotype and parrot all this information, but don't LISTEN to the average person. Or maybe you haven't even talked to the average
Read 16 tweets
30 Sep
@The_Libtarded @americabitches @KamVTV What "choice" btw? About AIDS? Choice of the minimal risk of bad side effects from the vax (which can also transmit) vs the very minimal chance they will die or have severe symptoms, which COULD affect the community through transmission or by taking a bed at the hospital?
@The_Libtarded @americabitches @KamVTV Yeah. That's a choice... Right now. But they are trying to remove the "choice" by firing people for not selecting the "right" choice. No job means no money. No money means no food. No food means death. Aka coercion. And guess what? They're also trying to remove exemptions
@The_Libtarded @americabitches @KamVTV 2/ You think the employers are evaluating the risks each person takes, like on a scale of 1-10? They aren't. And do you think the doctors are evaluating all the "risks" a person faces? Does the possible emotional devastation of potential pregnancy loss count to the doctors?
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(