Concerned at how the Times allows a strawman argument to be so central to this piece. No one who has read anything about redlining would define Redlining 101 as McWhorter does here. This is pure apologetics. nytimes.com/2021/09/28/opi… Image
In the very same piece he zeroes in on the fact, that while many whites lived redlined neighborhoods, virtually every Black citizen did, and for Black residents, unlike the white ones, there was no escape. Image
The man's own evidence cuts against the thesis he puts forward! How is this allowed to get past an editor? He invents a standard that allows him to dismiss the role of systemic racism in the disparate treatment of Black and white Americans. (As is his pattern and purpose.)
Just a few months ago, @hmcghee published The Sum of Us, a book which shows how systemic racism also often hurts white people and that there is a "solidarity dividend" to be gained from recognizing this, but also, the driving force is systemic racism.
Those poor white people that McWhorter argues are evidence against systemic racism are, in reality, evidence for the profound harms of systemic racism, how purposefully excluding Black citizens will also blow back on some white ones.
I mean, seriously, if a first-year student submitted this in my class, I would require them to grapple with this gaping hole in their argument so they could strengthen their claims for an interested audience. Why is this not the standard at the freaking New York Times?
Arrrgggghhhhhh!
I cannot emphasize enough that my ire is not because I disagree with McWhorter. It's because the freaking internal logic and evidence of the piece does not hold up to basic scrutiny. I'm offended by shit arguments by people who know better that treat the audience like idiots.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with John Warner

John Warner Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @biblioracle

2 Oct
Excellent analysis of the intersection of bullshit and branding at work in the current moral panics over CRT and "wokeness" from @donmoyn. donmoynihan.substack.com/p/bullshit-bra…
What's striking about the analysis is how the bullshit flows freely among the various levels, from an anti-semitic grifter, to a right wing activist huckster, and even a NYTimes columnist. Honestly can't see a way out of this. Depressing.
Like in an example @donmoyn discusses in the post, when Marc Lamont Hill demolishes the anti-semitic grifter in a televised segment, the response from the grifter is, "See he DOES know so much about this, just like I said." B.S. on top of B.S.
Read 10 tweets
1 Oct
Holy smokes! This just broke my irony meter. Imagine this guy cautioning against monomania when he's been writing the same stuff for the last 6 years. Professor, heal thyself! Image
Not to mention publishing your caution against monomania in the publication that runs the same article over and over again.
Is the argument that you are not engaging in monomania provided you're cautioning against other people's monomania?
Read 4 tweets
20 Sep
This is not the biggest problem around, but it's just irritating to see "wokeness" and "wokeism" framed as something that people explicitly argue in favor of. This is not my experience. Progressive people advocate for particular policies and frameworks, not an ideology of wokeism
That these specific policies and frameworks are gathered by the opponents of those frameworks under the name "wokeism" does not mean that those who advocate for them are advocating for wokeism. The policies can be looked at independently.
Like I suppose you an lump my stances on education policy/practice/structures under some kind of woke umbrella because I'm generally progressive, but I have very specific things that I'm championing and that they may be woke has nothing to do with that championing.
Read 15 tweets
17 Sep
Heterodox Academy has a new president, one of Charles Koch's "pet professors" who has also received 7-figure funding from the same foundation pushing the anti-CRT movement. Viewpoint diversity! insidehighered.com/blogs/just-vis…
I snark because I've sort of given up on trying to engage the HxA figures on mutual productive exchange. This was my most recent attempt. insidehighered.com/blogs/just-vis…
HxA has every right to exist and can choose whomever they want to lead them and advocate for whatever they want, but I am frustrated by the refusal to categorize them where they belong. They are funded by the same people as The Federalist, Daily Caller, Turning Point, etc...
Read 7 tweets
14 Sep
Gotta say, that the reading list for the course on "The University" from the new director of Heterodox Academy doesn't seem all that diverse from a viewpoint perspective, that is. heterodoxacademy.org/hxannouncement… Image
I have a suggestion for the course on "The University" if the new head of Heterodox Academy can handle part of a chapter that criticizes the effect of Heterodox Academy on institutions and discourse. beltpublishing.com/products/susta…
I'd also be happy to do a Zoom with the class so they might hear a little different perspective on "The University" than that pretty intellectually cramped (when it comes to viewpoint diversity) reading list.
Read 8 tweets
10 Sep
Have not gone for a run in 2 1/2 months, and I physically feel better than I have in years. Perhaps running is just not good for my body at this age. That said, I miss the mental zone out time running provided me.
I don't make that old man groaning noise when I get up anymore. I also used to not be able to drive more than 90 minutes without intense pain at the back of my knee because of the driving position.
Once the pandemic became apparent, my wife said we should get a Peleton and I was a huge skeptic, knowing our long history of briefly used, then abandoned fitness equipment, but I gotta admit, I'm a convert. I've done a Peleton-related activity 89 out of the last 90 days.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(