in March 2020 Rishi Sunak announced plans to move 22,000 civil servants out of central London by 2030

how’s that going?

er

civil service headcount in London grew 11% from 91,660 to 101,930 in the year to March 2021, more than double the rate elsewhere

ft.com/content/b6d194…
and what about over the period of 2010 to 2021 - ie since the Tories came to power?

- net *increase* of 15,401 civil servants in London

- net *decrease* of 58,005 across the other regions
here are the stats for last year….the trend could not be clearer
some officials moving this year to Wolverhampton, Glasgow, Darlington:

this won’t reverse job losses 2010-2021

-5,035 North-east
- 4,601 Yorkshire
- 4,635 West Midlands
- 4,785 East Midlands
- 8,188 East England
-11,506 South-east
-9,243 South-west
-3,012 Scotland
-685 NI
this is going to be a long thread - sorry - because I have become obsessed with this data
reaction from Labour’s @SteveReedMP

“this is the latest in a series of con tricks from a Conservative government which is more interested in churning out press releases than actually fixing economic disparities between different parts of the country”
so why did gov hire 10,000 officials in London over last year, while preaching the opposite?

- partly because of the surge in policymaking roles based in the capital

- first dealing with Brexit
- then tackling Covid

this @FT chart shows the pattern over the last 11 years
58,000 civil service jobs CUT outside London since 2010:

but new jobs now pledged

- “Treasury North” campus in Darlington with over 750 roles

- housing ministry Wolverhampton outpost with 800 officials…by 2030

- new branch of Cabinet Office in Glasgow with 500 staff by 2024
there's another curious twist to this tale:

I went back and looked at Gordon Brown's attempt to shift civil servants out of London in 2003 via the Michael Lyons review.

what happened over the following seven years?
the Lyons report - just like Sunak last year - called for 20,000 civil servants to be deployed out of London

it never really happened

the civil service workforce in London was almost exactly the same size seven years later - having dipped from 86,790 to 86,529
thoughts from Prof Tony Travers:

“these extraordinary figures show how Britain is such a centralised country that ministers can never escape the need for officials close by to provide them with administrative services, hour by hour, day by day….”
one final statistic:

even if Sunak succeeds in moving 22,000 officials out of London by 2030….which is possible…

….that will only take the London civil service back to its 2011 level

….and the regions will still be 34,000 short of their workforce back then

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jim Pickard

Jim Pickard Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PickardJE

25 Sep
government has at last confirmed our @ft scoop from yesterday:

“5,000 HGV drivers & 5,500 poultry workers added to existing visa scheme until Christmas 2021 to help food and fuel industries with driver shortages during exceptional circumstances this year”
ministers are sending nearly 1 million letters to all drivers who currently hold an HGV driving licence, encouraging them back into the industry
plus the government wants to train 4,000 more British HGV drivers
Read 5 tweets
11 Sep
meanwhile Johnson has warned today that voting Labour could imperil the benefits of Brexit
he goes on to list the benefits of Brexit so far
- already had freeports in EU

- member countries could opt out of the EU vaccine scheme

- not sure the Super League had anything to do with Brussels
Read 5 tweets
30 Jul
exclusive via @FT

- secretive club for major Conservative donors known as the ‘Advisory Board’ has been holding regular meetings and calls with Johnson & Sunak

- the club includes several members who have given at least £250,000 to the party

ft.com/content/f8a48b…
and here's our long read for @FTMag on Boris Johnson, the Conservative party and £$£$£

ft.com/content/8c6041…
it’s the cover story tomorrow

@GeorgeWParker
@SebastianEPayne
@kadhim
@tomburgis
@JasmineCC_95
& me
Read 5 tweets
14 Jul
Breaking 🚨

- there are over 700 workers at Nissan Sunderland - the UK’s largest car factory - self-isolating right now after being pinged by Covid app

- business groups warning that some companies are missing 20% of their staff

ft.com/content/560613… via @FinancialTimes
Richard Walker, managing director of Iceland Foods, said that Covid-related absences were “growing exponentially. Within a week or two they’ll be the highest ever.”

“This will be a shit show for business”.
The bars, restaurants and pubs sector is facing a similar labour crisis, according to Kate Nicholls, head of UKHospitality, who said that up to *a third* of staff were being forced to stay at home in some of the worst cases…
Read 4 tweets
13 Jul
BREAKING:

- government wins aid cut vote by 333-298 after substantial Tory rebellion

- result: Rishi Sunak's £4bn annual cut to Britain's international aid will continue for at least 5 years
WaterAid chief Tim Wainwright:

“Chancellor’s cynical move to balance Britain’s books on the backs of the world's poorest people will cost 100s of 1000s of lives. To cut aid for lifesaving water and sanitation in the middle of worst pandemic for 100 years is unconscionable."
ActionAid chief Frances Longley:

“Today the government has chosen to pull up the drawbridge and leave behind millions of the poorest women and girls around the world. This is unforgivable at a time when the pandemic has already rolled back women’s rights by a generation."
Read 5 tweets
21 Jun
a question for supporters of High-Speed 2, given the price tag has now risen from £33bn to over £106bn:

is there any price at which it's not worth doing? and if so what is that figure?
bear in mind that the cost of the scheme has risen by £1.7bn - equivalent to EIGHT trade yachts - in just the last 9 months

ft.com/content/510f2a…
I ask as someone who is studiously neutral on the issue
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(