Scott MacFarlane Profile picture
Oct 1, 2021 7 tweets 3 min read Read on X
ALERT: Court unseals Jan 6 case against Rafael and Maryann Rondon (mother and son) of Syracuse, NY

In charging documents, feds allege Rondon witnessed (and assisted) in theft of laptop computer from Speaker Nancy Pelosi office suite
* Syracuse-area. Arrest was in Syracuse

Defendants are from Watertown, NY per FBI statement (north on I-81)

Signed,
Syracuse Univ. alum
Per charging documents...... about the laptop computer, Maryann Rondon "admitted to providing gloves to a male individual to facilitate the theft of a government laptop from the conference room" in Pelosi suite
Per feds.. Rafael Rondon said, "While we were in the office, one of the individuals, he was trying to rip the ethernet cords to one of the laptops, and he yelled at me and my mother to help him. And I was honestly a little bit afraid... "I didn’t know if he had anything on him"
The Rondons are accused of entering US Senate chamber and taking......... escape hoods from inside
And this excerpt from court documents..... about why Rafael Rondon says they chose to take the Metro subway system into DC on Jan 6 ===>
Feds also allege Rafael Rondon had "possession of an unregistered sawed-off shotgun at his residence"

Press release: justice.gov/usao-ndny/pr/w…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Scott MacFarlane

Scott MacFarlane Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MacFarlaneNews

Jan 12
NEW: Sen. Mark Kelly (D-AZ) has filed a federal civil lawsuit against Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth Image
Hegseth recently began a process to demote and cut the retirement pay of Sen. Mark Kelly

Kelly's lawsuit seeks a judicial review of the agency's action
Hegseth has criticized Kelly over a video in which Kelly, a retired Navy captain, called on servicemembers to "refuse illegal orders"

Hegseth said he had issued a letter of censure to Kelly, who served in the Navy until 2011. Kelly has pledged to fight the move.
Read 6 tweets
Jan 8
FLASH: Sen Thom Tillis (R-NC) is on Senate floor and he's about to make a motion for "unanimous consent" to expedite the hanging of the January 6th plaque at the Capitol

To honor the police heroes
Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR) speaks first: "In 2022, we passed a law .. saying we'd hang this plaque"

"I'm here to team up with my colleague from North Carolina to have a strategy to make sure we *do* have this plaque up"
Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC) is now speaking. He recalls that he was on floor in Senate chamber on Jan 6.

Tillis says prior law requiring Jan 6 plaque had a "technical" issue that requires clarity. He says issue can be quickly cured

(MORE)
Read 15 tweets
Jan 6
JAN 6 - 5 years later

Some pardoned rioters are retracing their march from the Ellipse to the Capitol

Some victims are part of a 10am hearing organized by House Democrats

And: Anger, toxicity and confrontation continue to define Jan 6. Still.
Poltico Playbook on Jan 6 just now:

“Today D.C., and much of America, is deeply divided about what happened.

That lack of consensus represents a triumph, of sorts, for Donald Trump, and stands as testament to his unmatched ability both to reshape political narratives and to carry his supporters to extraordinary positions”
Injured DC police officer Dan Hodges says the Jan 6 denialism remains rampant

“Everything on January 6 occurred exactly as it appeared to. There’s no conspiracy here, there’s no, it wasn’t a “Fed-surrection”
Read 13 tweets
Jan 6
NEW: House Speaker Mike Johnson – after two years of deflecting questions on the matter – is now arguing that the legally-required January 6 plaque must be re-considered

(more)
In a statement tonight, a spokesperson for Speaker Johnson says:

"As written, the statute authorizing this plaque is not implementable, and proposed alternatives devised by Democrat House staff, not members, also do not comply with the statute. If Democrats are serious about commemorating the work of USCP officers, they are free to work with the appropriate committees of jurisdiction to develop a framework for proper vetting and consideration, just as the House does for Congressional Gold Medals, commemorative gold coins, and similar ceremonial responsibilities”
Federal law required the Jan 6 plaque to be hung on Capitol grounds by March 2023

It has not been.

(MORE) Image
Read 6 tweets
Jan 2
ONE YEAR AFTER THE PARDONS:

Growing number of Jan 6 riot defendants are in new legal peril

HERE ARE SOME ====>
Zachary Alam faces a hearing this month ahead of sentencing in a breaking-&-entering case in Henrico County, Virginia

Alam was convicted in October

On Jan 6, we was on frontlines outside House Speaker's Lobby and rioters confronted police and evacuating House members

(MORE) Image
Image
Christopher Moynihan of New York has pleaded NOT GUILTY in Dutchess County, New York in a new threat case

Months after pardon, Moynihan allegedly sent text message that he planned to "eliminate" Rep. Hakeem Jeffries in October

Moynihan was on Senate floor on Jan 6, 2021 Image
Read 6 tweets
Dec 31, 2025
ALERT: House Judiciary Committee releases 250+ page transcript of its interview of Special Counsel Jack Smith

Smith testified: "January 6th was an attack on the structure of our democracy in which over 140 heroic law enforcement officers were assaulted. Over 160 individuals later pled guilty to assaulting police that day. Exploiting that violence, President Trump and his associates tried to call Members of Congress in furtherance of their criminal scheme, urging them to further delay certification of the 2020 election. I did not choose those Members, President Trump did"

(MORE)
Special Counsel Jack Smith interview w/ House Judiciary Committee (MORE)

Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH): "You just made some pretty definitive statements about your belief that President Trump was guilty of these charges. Is that correct?"

Jack Smith: "Yes, I believe we had proof beyond a reasonable doubt in both cases"

Jordan: "And doesn't the Justice Manual prohibit prosecutors from asserting that a defendant is guilty of something before a jury makes a determination?"

Smith: "When a case is pending, yes."
When he was asked about other election disputes (including 2000 election), Jack Smith told House Judiciary Cmte:

"There is no historical analog for what President Trump did in this case. As we said in the indictment, he was free to say that he thought he won the election. He was even free to say falsely that he won the election"
Read 18 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(