Check out our new preprint: SARS-CoV-2 infections elicit higher levels of original antigenic sin antibodies compared to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccinations
1/
medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
We found that both SARS-CoV-2 infections and mRNA vaccinations elicit antibodies that bind to the S1 and S2 regions of the SARS-CoV-2 spike. 2nd doses of vaccine primarily boost antibodies reactive to S1.
2/
Here is where it gets interesting: SARS-CoV-2 infections boost antibodies that react to the S2 region of OC43 (a related seasonal coronavirus). SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines boost OC43-reactive antibodies less than infection.
3/
Even though SARS-CoV-2 infections efficiently boost OC43-reactive antibodies, these antibodies paradoxically do not bind to SARS-CoV-2 antigens in absorption assays. So, the OC43-reactive antibodies boosted by infection have a very low affinity for SARS-CoV-2.
4/
We found that mRNA vaccines elicit antibodies that behave very differently in these absorption assays. The OC43-reactive antibodies boosted by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines efficiently bind to both OC43 and SARS-CoV-2 antigens. These antibodies are truly cross-reactive.
5/
These studies show that SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines elicit fundamentally different antibody responses compared to SARS-CoV-2 infections. Infections elicit higher levels of OC43 antibodies, but these bind poorly to SARS-CoV-2.
6/
How does this happen? We think that antigenically distinct viruses engage memory B cells elicited by prior infections through multiple low affinity interactions with thousands of B cell receptors on memory B cells.
7/
What is the consequence of SARS-CoV-2 infections boosting low affinity OC43-reactive S2 Abs? The short answer is that we don't know. Could this compromise de novo responses? Or maybe the recall of OC43-reactive B cells is a good thing, because these cells can then adapt.
8/
It is fascinating that mRNA vaccines elicit antibodies that bind efficiently to both OC43 and SARS-CoV-2. We think that long-lived germinal centers elicited by mRNA vaccines create a lush environment where B cells primed by past OC43 exposures can adapt.
9/
At the end of the day, all of these findings are consistent with Thomas Francis' doctrine of original antigen sin. Francis figured out a lot of this over 60 years ago with a lab filled with red blood cells and crude virus isolates.
10/
This is another great collaboration with many labs at @PennMedicine.

@penn really is a special place.

11/11

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Hensley Lab

Hensley Lab Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SCOTTeHENSLEY

19 Apr
Our new study evaluating the relationship between common coronavirus antibodies and SARS-CoV-2 susceptibility using a cohort of >2,000 health care workers is now up at @medrxivpreprint. (1/n)
medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
We collected serum samples from 2,043 health care workers during the first wave of SARS-CoV-2 activity in Philadelphia, PA. We identified a subset of health care workers who went on to become infected with SARS-CoV-2 after we collected serum samples. (2/n)
Individuals infected during the first wave of SARS-CoV-2 activity in Philadelphia mounted long lived antibody responses and we identified only one potential re-infection event during the second wave. (3/n)
Read 15 tweets
9 Feb
1/ Our paper showing that ~20% of humans possessed non-neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 prior to the COVID-19 pandemic was published today @CellCellPress.

cell.com/cell/fulltext/…
2/ I described this study when we released this as a preprint in November:
3/ We found that most of us are infected with seasonal coronaviruses by age 4-5 (similar to flu). Image
Read 9 tweets
14 Jan
There has been recent discussion of how this influenza virus mouse study that I completed as a postdoc potentially relates to current SARS-CoV-2 evolution, so I thought I would write a short thread about it. 1/
@trvrb @LauringLab

science.sciencemag.org/content/326/59…
@trvrb brought this up recently and @lauringlab also tweeted on this earlier 2/

Here is the story: influenza viruses do not have a high enough error rate to simultaneously acquire mutations that block all of the different types of antibodies in most polyclonal serum...that part was figured out in 1979 when I was still in diapers....3/
Read 12 tweets
10 Nov 20
Our new paper showing that some humans possessed non-neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 prior to the COVID-19 pandemic is now up at @medrxivpreprint. Importantly, we find that these antibodies are not associated with SARS-CoV-2 protection. 1/7

medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
Our data have some similarities but some key differences with a paper published last week @ScienceMagazine. 2/7

science.sciencemag.org/content/early/…
In our study:
1. We did not find that kids had higher levels of pre-pandemic SARS-CoV-2 cross-reactive antibodies compared to adults.
2. We found that pre-pandemic SARS-CoV-2 cross-reactive antibodies were non-neutralizing. 3/7
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(