Check out our new preprint: SARS-CoV-2 infections elicit higher levels of original antigenic sin antibodies compared to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccinations 1/ medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
We found that both SARS-CoV-2 infections and mRNA vaccinations elicit antibodies that bind to the S1 and S2 regions of the SARS-CoV-2 spike. 2nd doses of vaccine primarily boost antibodies reactive to S1. 2/
Here is where it gets interesting: SARS-CoV-2 infections boost antibodies that react to the S2 region of OC43 (a related seasonal coronavirus). SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines boost OC43-reactive antibodies less than infection. 3/
Even though SARS-CoV-2 infections efficiently boost OC43-reactive antibodies, these antibodies paradoxically do not bind to SARS-CoV-2 antigens in absorption assays. So, the OC43-reactive antibodies boosted by infection have a very low affinity for SARS-CoV-2. 4/
We found that mRNA vaccines elicit antibodies that behave very differently in these absorption assays. The OC43-reactive antibodies boosted by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines efficiently bind to both OC43 and SARS-CoV-2 antigens. These antibodies are truly cross-reactive. 5/
These studies show that SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines elicit fundamentally different antibody responses compared to SARS-CoV-2 infections. Infections elicit higher levels of OC43 antibodies, but these bind poorly to SARS-CoV-2. 6/
How does this happen? We think that antigenically distinct viruses engage memory B cells elicited by prior infections through multiple low affinity interactions with thousands of B cell receptors on memory B cells.
7/
What is the consequence of SARS-CoV-2 infections boosting low affinity OC43-reactive S2 Abs? The short answer is that we don't know. Could this compromise de novo responses? Or maybe the recall of OC43-reactive B cells is a good thing, because these cells can then adapt.
8/
It is fascinating that mRNA vaccines elicit antibodies that bind efficiently to both OC43 and SARS-CoV-2. We think that long-lived germinal centers elicited by mRNA vaccines create a lush environment where B cells primed by past OC43 exposures can adapt.
9/
At the end of the day, all of these findings are consistent with Thomas Francis' doctrine of original antigen sin. Francis figured out a lot of this over 60 years ago with a lab filled with red blood cells and crude virus isolates.
10/
This is another great collaboration with many labs at @PennMedicine.
Our new study evaluating the relationship between common coronavirus antibodies and SARS-CoV-2 susceptibility using a cohort of >2,000 health care workers is now up at @medrxivpreprint. (1/n) medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
We collected serum samples from 2,043 health care workers during the first wave of SARS-CoV-2 activity in Philadelphia, PA. We identified a subset of health care workers who went on to become infected with SARS-CoV-2 after we collected serum samples. (2/n)
Individuals infected during the first wave of SARS-CoV-2 activity in Philadelphia mounted long lived antibody responses and we identified only one potential re-infection event during the second wave. (3/n)
1/ Our paper showing that ~20% of humans possessed non-neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 prior to the COVID-19 pandemic was published today @CellCellPress.
There has been recent discussion of how this influenza virus mouse study that I completed as a postdoc potentially relates to current SARS-CoV-2 evolution, so I thought I would write a short thread about it. 1/ @trvrb@LauringLab
Here is the story: influenza viruses do not have a high enough error rate to simultaneously acquire mutations that block all of the different types of antibodies in most polyclonal serum...that part was figured out in 1979 when I was still in diapers....3/
Our new paper showing that some humans possessed non-neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 prior to the COVID-19 pandemic is now up at @medrxivpreprint. Importantly, we find that these antibodies are not associated with SARS-CoV-2 protection. 1/7
In our study: 1. We did not find that kids had higher levels of pre-pandemic SARS-CoV-2 cross-reactive antibodies compared to adults. 2. We found that pre-pandemic SARS-CoV-2 cross-reactive antibodies were non-neutralizing. 3/7