The CRT moral panic is built on a mixture of deliberately obtuse language (in other words, bullshit) and misleading branding.

New post from me, consider subscribing:
donmoynihan.substack.com/p/bullshit-bra…
One irony I didn't have room to include is that the anti-CRT advocates connect CRT theorists to diversity training as a big gotcha. But actual CRT theorists are themselves either doubtful of such trainings (Crenshaw) or certainly didn't model them in their own teaching (Bell).
Bullshit performs different tasks:
*conveys sophistication, a reassurance that “this is a smart man, an intellectual"
*establishes conspiratorial beliefs
*provides coded language that signals in-group membership.
*denies any simpler alternative explanations
*enables branding
Branding is related to bullshit, but plays different roles in policy discourse:
*rebrands popular ideas into negative frames
*facilitates mass communication
*creates heuristics that upend rational thinking
*makes money for the brand owners donmoynihan.substack.com/p/bullshit-bra…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Don Moynihan

Don Moynihan Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @donmoyn

1 Oct
Absolutely called this one
Upgrade
What is amazing about this diatribe is that the President of Claremont makes no effort to disagree that Eastman plotted to overturn the election. Or to distance Claremont from it.
Instead he argues that political scientists have no right to weigh in on the Eastman memo!
Read 4 tweets
1 Oct
She doesn't play by Washington's rules! (Apart from centering her political identity on keeping an archaic Senate rule)
She has spreadsheets! (But won't define her policy positions in a way that facilitates negotiation).
The substantive reporting in this bit sort of underlines a) the incoherence of her position - limit tax increases but wants lots of expensive stuff b) what she actually disagrees with
"Secret spreadsheets" - Drink!
Read 4 tweets
29 Sep
The full list of words that the sponsor of the newly passed “CRT” bill in Wisconsin warned were illegal.
These make clear it’s Not about an obscure legal theory: it’s about blocking discussion of systemic racism. 1/3 madison.com/news/local/gov…
The trigger words that Wisconsin legislators say can’t be included in education include
“diversity”
“Equity”
“Inclusion”
“Cultural awareness”
“Multiculturalism”
If policymakers succeed in scrubbing terms like “white privilege” and “structural racism” from education, how are educators supposed to explain bills like this? madison.com/news/local/gov…
Read 4 tweets
28 Sep
Anti-vaxxer persuaded COVID patient in Ireland to leave hospital against doctor's advice. Two days later he had to be readmitted. A week later he was dead. irishcentral.com/news/joe-mccar…
Normally I don't share stuff about people who passed from COVID, but in this case it reflects how conspiracy theorists are using COVID to push anti-government views with deadly consequences. The "rescuer" was echoing "sovereign citizen" claims we see in US irishtimes.com/news/crime-and…
Folks, don't let conspiracy theorists make your public health decisions for you. irishtimes.com/news/crime-and…
Read 5 tweets
28 Sep
If the choices are a) means-test for higher earners or b) make it harder for the poor by not making it fully refundable or adding work requirements, I would opt for a).
But partly depends on what means-testing means. Would favor just lowering income caps to keep it simple.
Purely as a budget choice I absolutely say focus money to the poor if you have to cut. But the long-term experience we have with programs is that they become more vulnerable the less universal they become.
Tradeoffs like means-testing or adding burdens may not give you the long-run political support that survey experiments suggest. Classic @jbsoss & @sanfordschram piece shows that the promised support for welfare never emerged after 1990s welfare reform cambridge.org/core/journals/…
Read 4 tweets
28 Sep
If you are concerned about threats to democracy, such as changes in election laws, you should also worry about how politicization of the career public sector will remove a protection against creeping authoritarianism.

New from me. Consider subscribing! donmoynihan.substack.com/p/you-should-b…
Despite Trump's framing of the "deep state" the US actually relies more on political appointees than other countries, and the career public service has been shrinking over time. 2/ donmoynihan.substack.com/p/you-should-b…
This post digs in to explain something that did not get a lot of attention before the election, which was a Trump Executive Order that would have allowed him to convert career officials to at will employees. Why was this so dangerous? 3/
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(