I will not rule it out as impossible, but i would like to know primary sources here.
It seems a lot of this writer's research here is comprised of interviews and anecdotes.
It seems a lot of this writer's research here is comprised of interviews and anecdotes.
https://twitter.com/singhhabhiishek/status/1444243629023719424
A lot of sanghies will brush this off as biased British propaganda, but that makes no sense. (Btw stop dismissing everything uncomfortable as british conspiracy, it may be true at times, but wanton misuse of the excuse is just a proof of your own intellectual laziness)
Why would brits feel need to propagandize against RSS in 1970s ? india is already independent at this point, and RSS is not even an electoral threat at this point, forget about it being a geopolitical threat to western imperialism.
In fact western powers were much more anti-indira than anti-sangh during this point.
So the British bias should be off the table here unless a probable motive can be pointed out.
So the British bias should be off the table here unless a probable motive can be pointed out.
What we should be really wary about, is the writer's sources.
If you are doing a research in 1970s india, you are operating in a congress dominated environ. It's Indira-era ffs.
If he is conducting interviews then, all he is doing is collecting spicy rumours by congi sycophants.
If you are doing a research in 1970s india, you are operating in a congress dominated environ. It's Indira-era ffs.
If he is conducting interviews then, all he is doing is collecting spicy rumours by congi sycophants.
And I'm assuming this info is coming from interviews becos hardly anyone puts this stuff in verifiable paperwork primarily.
Unless ofcourse there is personal correspondence available. But hardly anyone preserves such personal letters unless they live in a very progressive society
Unless ofcourse there is personal correspondence available. But hardly anyone preserves such personal letters unless they live in a very progressive society
We know gandhi was degenerate for sure because that info came directly out of his own writings, lmao.
And people interviewed (who corroborated gandhi's degeneracy) were not anonymous at all, they went on the record and were in direct contact with him++
And people interviewed (who corroborated gandhi's degeneracy) were not anonymous at all, they went on the record and were in direct contact with him++
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
