EFF joined a letter from civil society organizations urging the UN Human Rights Council @UN_HRC to denounce the human rights violations facilitated by NSO Group’s spyware as highlighted by the #PegasusProejct. accessnow.org/letter-un-hrc-…
The letter also urged the UN Human Rights Council @UN_HRC to act within its power “to investigate and prevent further violations linked to the sale, export, and use of Pegasus spyware and cases of targeted surveillance.”
EFF has raised the alarm for years about tech companies selling their surveillance and censorship products and services to repressive regimes. eff.org/deeplinks/2019…
Tech companies should be incentivized to do everything they can to ensure their products aren’t used to target journalists, activists, and dissidents. And they should face liability if they fail to take reasonable steps to protect all of their users. eff.org/deeplinks/2011…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Students are some of the most surveilled people in the U.S. Now, artificial intelligence is being used to determine whether their behavior online is an indicator of a threat to themselves and others--and reporting them to their school.
Yet, AI-driven student surveillance software flags a high percentage of false positives, begging the question whether the benefits outweigh violating students’ privacy.
As Hina Talib, associate professor at Children’s Hospital at Montefiore in New York, said, “Privacy is a developmental milestone for teens.”
THREAD: In addition to the drastic restrictions it places on a woman’s reproductive and medical care rights, the new Texas abortion law, SB8, will have devastating effects on online speech. eff.org/deeplinks/2021…
The law will create anti-choice trolls: a class of lawyers and plaintiffs dedicated to using the courts to extort money from a wide variety of speakers supporting abortion rights.
SB8 is a “bounty law”: it doesn’t just allow these lawsuits, it provides a significant financial incentive to file them. It is an attack on many fundamental rights, including the First Amendment rights to advocate for abortion rights and to provide basic educational information.
Ecuador: @LaPosta_Ecu ’s investigation about open source developer Ola Bini’s case unveils key political interests and implications entangled in his criminal prosecution.
According to the investigation, the Swedish-born developer’s detention in Quito’s airport in 2019 as a “Russian hacker” was a government response to the leak of the “INA papers,” a corruption scandal involving former President Lenin Moreno. 2/6
Four different sources confirmed attending a meeting where high-ranking government officials were informed, before his detention and prosecution, that Ola Bini was not the leak’s suspect they were looking for. 3/6
Canada's proposed online censorship proposal may be the worst yet in a growing pile of bad regimes. The potential harms are vast, especially since much of the details are left open to government and regulatory interpretation. 1/ eff.org/deeplinks/2021…
@EFF Canadian platforms could be forced to rely on automated filters to monitor all posts on their platforms for "harmful" content. Users caught up in these sweeps could end up on file with the local cops—or with Canada’s national security agencies. 2/ eff.org/deeplinks/2021…
@EFF Private communications are excluded from the Canadian proposal, but that is cold comfort—the Canadian government will be able to follow the examples of other countries and declare that encrypted chat groups of various sizes are not ‘private.’ 3/ eff.org/deeplinks/2020…
The Canadian government is planning to implement new dangerous content moderation rules -- and a new speech czar with broad powers to enforce them. eff.org/deeplinks/2021…
@EFF Platforms will likely be forced to rely on automated filters to assess and discover "harmful" content on their platforms, and users caught up in these sweeps could end up on file with the local cops—or with Canada’s national security agencies. eff.org/deeplinks/2021…
@EFF This is dangerous for everyone, but especially marginalized groups. Faced with expansive and vague moderation obligations, little time for analysis, and major legal consequences if they guess wrong, companies inevitably over censor—and users pay the price.