Good morning from Poland 🇵🇱☀️ ! Shall we speak a bit about Asian economics, namely Asia & oil today?
Before we talk about Asia & oil, let's go through data we didn't (Friday was a holiday in Hong Kong & I was flying & don't forget that mainland China is off this week). Remember that China manufacturing PMI (state) was bad on power outages + demand.
But EM ex Asia doing better.
Notably, India is doing better, another month of expansion - we'll speak about why that will put some pressure on the current account. Indonesia great! Again, IDR is my favorite EM Asia FX at the moment for reasons u know - got better mobility + amazing trade + high yield. Good!!
Vietnam still doing very badly but that was September & the heat it got for shutting down factories will lead to normalization/living w/ the virus. Other ASEAN also doing better. Look at Malaysia. The Philippines also a bit better.
Overall, weak but trend is on the mend!
Now that you see some activity indicators, let's talk about oil & Asia. When people say that in the macro world, 2 things: impact on CPI and of course the balance of payment - can u afford high oil prices & what meaning to FX etc. What are the CPI trends? Not that high like PPI.
You can juxtapose Asian CPI with Western CPI (I'm in the West now but the East of the West, as in Eastern Europe), which went way higher & many much higher than in Asia. US CPI on par w/ India for example!!! But not just the US.
Anyway, back to Asia. PPI higher in Asia though!
Which will dominate? Higher costs via supply shocks or demand still dampened by Covid etc? We did a quantitative analysis & found that historically, Asian CPI is much more impacted by demand shocks.
We say (& been proven right so far) that CPI not a huge concern if demand down.
Now, how do u link news like higher oil prices/power shocks to structures of economies & distilling losers/winners.
1st, let's look at trade in Asia (chart show net): We import commodities & export manufactured goods for the most part as we're people rich & resource poor.👈🏻
So?
The largest deficit of commodity goes to China, Japan, South Korea etc. Basically the traders. They take their comparative advantage of people + capital & import commodities & add value to it & then export goods like textiles, electronics, cars, chips. China biggest trader of all
When oil/energy/commodities go higher, that means Asia's input costs go higher (by that I mean manufacturers') & u see that in PPI.
Note CPI hasn't gone up much as China CPI sub 1%. So? Manufacturers feel SQUEEZED. Hence PMIs terrible. Need to raise prices or reduce production.
News about China power outages is about how the industry is structured. Coal is key for electricity (>70% of electricity) but domestic coal production reduced + imported coal prices went higher + prices suppressed so few incentives to produce more for smaller players. So outages.
And that story is played out across the world for places with higher demand for power/commodity/energy but supply suppressed for many reasons (low investment due to change of energy strategy to less coal & more green etc). Choices must be made between prices & quantity of energy.
These aren't good choices. If u lower quantity consumed not through higher efficiency but sheer outages, then u got lower output of production/consumption (e.g. China). If u allow firms to raise power prices, then u got higher costs everywhere. No matter what, here are the losers
The losers are the net importers of fuels (orange in chart is fuels). They are everyone in Asia except Australia, Indonesia, and Malaysia (Brunei too but I don't use it). Tough choices ahead. Look at India. Not a huge trader but 3rd largest importer in Asia for consumption. And?
I explained last week that India source of electricity is coal (and also import oil for other uses) & coal reserves down. Meaning they have to face higher domestic auction prices or import expensive coal. Beyond coal, oil import is expensive too. Plus India demand is recovering!!
Preliminary data shows that merchandise exports rose 21% in September to USD33.4b, while imports jumped about 85% to $56.6, the trade ministry said. Oil imports surged 199% to $17.4bn!
Rupee weakened as a result. But don't despair, India should get decent capital inflows to help
And this is no BOP crisis (the ability to pay for imports) as India got plenty of reserves + capital flows likely decent.
Anyway, WINNERS? I pick Indonesia. Malaysia + Australia too but let me explain why not as good.
While Australia is the largest commodity trader in Asia - massive - it is mostly iron ore where it is getting its foreign FX. And iron ore is down as China curbs steel production + outlook on real estate sector meh (have u heard of Evergrande?) So? While fuels gain, iron ores sag
Malaysia also got goodies like natural gas etc but it also has tons of manu so its gains on natural gas is mitigated by the manufacturing sector sagged by higher input prices. Either way, still better off than the rest.
Indonesia is a clear gain. Got oil, natural gas, palm oil
You can see it in the bond market, FX etc that Indonesia is doing well & it remains my fav
Btw, u would have known this already if u followed my ASEAN supply chain note where I went through each country's trade structure.
U must know structure to decipher cyclical trends 🤗👈🏻.
Btw, equity analysts are cutting target prices of footwear stocks on supply issues on 4 October.
@Trinhnomics wrote a note on 12 August highlighting this will happen as ASEAN got Covid!!!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I'm listening to Jonas Kaufmann thinking about tariffs and Asia. His voice is beautiful (we got tickets to see him 22 Feb - highly recommended). I'll do thread later on regarding tariffs etc but my bandwidth is limited lately given the admins.
Remember that US tariffs only matter for the 4.1trn that it imported from the world in 2024 - making it the biggest importer in the world or #1 customer.
Despite higher tariffs, the US has one of the lowest trade-weighted average tariffs in the world. What does that mean? If Trump wants & gets reciprocal tariffs, others will have to fall to US levels or the wall of protectionism rises to reciprocate others' wall of protectionism.
An example is the EU 10% tariff on auto for the US while the US has 2.5% on the EU auto.
So either the EU drops tariffs to 2.5% or the US can raise to 10% or pick at other items.
Meaning, it's the EU choice & rightly so to have 10% on the US, just like it's the US choice to do whatever it wants with goods coming from the EU.
The issue here of course is that the US is the largest importer of goods globally. There lies the headlines.
If you import almost nothing from the world and u raise tariffs, no one actually says you are protectionist because they gain nothing and lose nothing.
Who is good at dealing w/ the US? Look to Japan. They are the pros. They have an FTA & has been deploying tons of FDI to the US. Hence I think Japan will be unscathed.
Are tariffs the only trade barriers you can pose? Absolutely not. Non-tariff barriers are also huge barriers to global trade.
Anyway, talk soon! Don't get depressed by the headlines - they tend to make you think something is bigger than it is.
The news' job is to shock and awe. The reality is global markets are taking everything w/ stride because, well, much worse news was priced in.
And btw, Trump has higher approval ratings than his first term for the same honeymoon phase.
What does that tell you? Well, he's gonna keep going.
President Trump was inaugurated and the big question is to whom tariffs will be applied, not whether. Markets priced 8-9% tariffs on world before inauguration & so the dollar softened as he did not do this on Day 1.
But rest assure, it's coming. Let's talk about consequences through answering 3 key questions.
Ready?
First, I talked about tariffs here on this thread if you didn't read before () & this is a follow-up.
Question #1: Who is most vulnerable to Trump 10% tariff to the world in Asia?
First, I want to talk about a few ideas that was talked about in the previous thread on impact of tariffs.
One is of course tariff level. He says 10% higher so that's our assumption here. Second, elasticity of demand assumption, which I took as 4, which is basically from the literature and also from the Fed paper.
Anyway, to think about impact on GDP, you have to think how big of a trader they are anyway in terms of exports to the US.
Chart 3 shows you that exports to the US is the highest for Vietnam & lowest for Australia, Indonesia and India.
Chart 2 shows you that what is the manufacturing share of GDP an the highest is Taiwan, China, Thailand, Vietnam & Malaysia. Lowest is Australia and India.
Okay, yesterday, you had China rocking global trade with a USD1trn merchandise trade surplus, but by Friday (17th), we'll get news that China industrial profits are FALLING for a 3rd year in row.
What's going on? How does this work? And finally, what does it mean for the rest of the world?
Let's look at China industrial profits for 2024 from Jan to November.
It's down -4.5% & in 2023 it was down & in 2022 it was down.
Fine, but not all sectors experienced decline. These are the sectors with some profit: food manufacturing, textile, tobacco, furniture manufacturing, electricity, waste, and basically a few sectors kind of not that negative or flat - general equipment.
Sorry, meant to write a longer thread but had to go! Long story short, China is experiencing a balance sheet recession and with a few sectors growing so all that savings is being channeled to it.
That means reduced profits and which means to make more money it has to sell outward & thus that translates to profits being squeezed increasingly abroad too as it gains market share.
You can see that in the export data where exports grow but imports not so much. In Germany's case, it's losing out of both ability to export to China (Chinese imports of German stuff decline) & also China selling more of its goods in Germany.
But that is not all. The Germans are likely facing competition in third markets too.
And replace Germans with others like Japan, South Korea, and of course even not big traders like Indonesia.
So China's problem of weakening profits is global.
First, let's talk about the losers, as in DECLINE IN CHINA IMPORTS.
Germany saw imports from China decline by -10.7%, followed by France (-5.9%) and then Italy (-3.2%). Meaning, the Dutch still got something China want (ASLM chip making machine) but others saw decline of goods.
To add salt to injury, not only is Europe losing market share in China, Chinese goods have RISEN in Europe in nominal term or exports rose to 516bn.
But that's just Europe. It likely also lost out in other markets too, but the US. Europe gained US market share.
Who else lost out in LESS CHINESE IMPORTS (contraction in nominal term)??? Well, Thailand, which is a -5.2% contraction, Indonesia too! -4% (Chinese demand weak so commodity weak = less imports) And Japan -2.6% and also Australia -10% (Chinese demand weak so less demand for commodity etc)
And of course India at -3%. India is an interesting case because it loses in EXPORT TO CHINA BUT China has managed to export more and so India got a pretty large deficit with China at more than -100bn.
It is a beautiful day in HK. I’m at lunch, well, waiting for my bff at a wonderful Italian place called Cantina (next door was our wedding reception 5 yrs ago) & opened up my fav pink paper & the FT Big Read was Ursula choking Europe with regulations (she also chairs a paper that also supposed give her more money to deregulate). There lies the rub. Can u let the person who has led Europe down this rabbit hole be the person to lead it out of it? Some pics from my walk from home to lunch. Hong Kong 🇭🇰 is lovely, best time to visit is October, November & December.
“Inflexible EU rules set Europe’s car 🚗 industry for failure” says critics according to the paper.
“Conservatives & far-right lawmakers accuse the bloc’s ambitious green & digital agendas of punishing citizens & businesses.”
Interesting the definition of conservative & far-right. But irrespective, you can see the results.
She & Draghi chaired a report that says the EU is uncompetitive & too regulated & strangled. Behind.
Okay, but who has been in charge?
Not the conservative & far-right. Ursula has been in charge. All along.
So if we have to measure her performance with, well, outcome, then what is the score card? She said it herself in the report.
The RBI just cut the cash rate by 50bps and kept the policy rate on hold at 6.5% as slowing government spending and a weakening manufacturing sector is dragging down GDP growth.
This is my short thread on examining the India-Japan investment and trade relationship & why they haven't changed much in 10 years despite India being a big domestic demand market that Japan needs.
I argue that this is symptomatic of what is happening to Indian firms themselves. They find it hard to scale and leverage the labor endowments the country has.
How do we change this? Well, by changing the norms of thinking that the government needs to micro manage everything. It should set framework but let Indian private sector flourish.
Let's go.
First, what is the India Japan relationship? Well, it's getting better but remains SMALL relative to the ASEAN Japan (Vietnam Japan for example). Japan investment to India despite India being a huge domestic demand market that is super complementary to Japan weak demographic trends is at 4% of total. Look at ASEAN. Yes, at peak around 28% and settling about 24% of total.
India is a ginormous market. So why growing just from 2 to 4% of total???
Now let's look at Japan imports from India - it basically remains flat at a small level of 1% of total. Meanwhile, imports from China is 22% and ASEAN 15%.
So Japanese FDI to India has increased to 4% of total but imports remain small.
Basically this relationship remains small and has a lot of scope to grow.