Good morning from Poland 🇵🇱☀️ ! Shall we speak a bit about Asian economics, namely Asia & oil today?
Before we talk about Asia & oil, let's go through data we didn't (Friday was a holiday in Hong Kong & I was flying & don't forget that mainland China is off this week). Remember that China manufacturing PMI (state) was bad on power outages + demand.
But EM ex Asia doing better.
Notably, India is doing better, another month of expansion - we'll speak about why that will put some pressure on the current account. Indonesia great! Again, IDR is my favorite EM Asia FX at the moment for reasons u know - got better mobility + amazing trade + high yield. Good!!
Vietnam still doing very badly but that was September & the heat it got for shutting down factories will lead to normalization/living w/ the virus. Other ASEAN also doing better. Look at Malaysia. The Philippines also a bit better.
Overall, weak but trend is on the mend!
Now that you see some activity indicators, let's talk about oil & Asia. When people say that in the macro world, 2 things: impact on CPI and of course the balance of payment - can u afford high oil prices & what meaning to FX etc. What are the CPI trends? Not that high like PPI.
You can juxtapose Asian CPI with Western CPI (I'm in the West now but the East of the West, as in Eastern Europe), which went way higher & many much higher than in Asia. US CPI on par w/ India for example!!! But not just the US.
Anyway, back to Asia. PPI higher in Asia though!
Which will dominate? Higher costs via supply shocks or demand still dampened by Covid etc? We did a quantitative analysis & found that historically, Asian CPI is much more impacted by demand shocks.
We say (& been proven right so far) that CPI not a huge concern if demand down.
Now, how do u link news like higher oil prices/power shocks to structures of economies & distilling losers/winners.
1st, let's look at trade in Asia (chart show net): We import commodities & export manufactured goods for the most part as we're people rich & resource poor.👈🏻
So?
The largest deficit of commodity goes to China, Japan, South Korea etc. Basically the traders. They take their comparative advantage of people + capital & import commodities & add value to it & then export goods like textiles, electronics, cars, chips. China biggest trader of all
When oil/energy/commodities go higher, that means Asia's input costs go higher (by that I mean manufacturers') & u see that in PPI.
Note CPI hasn't gone up much as China CPI sub 1%. So? Manufacturers feel SQUEEZED. Hence PMIs terrible. Need to raise prices or reduce production.
News about China power outages is about how the industry is structured. Coal is key for electricity (>70% of electricity) but domestic coal production reduced + imported coal prices went higher + prices suppressed so few incentives to produce more for smaller players. So outages.
And that story is played out across the world for places with higher demand for power/commodity/energy but supply suppressed for many reasons (low investment due to change of energy strategy to less coal & more green etc). Choices must be made between prices & quantity of energy.
These aren't good choices. If u lower quantity consumed not through higher efficiency but sheer outages, then u got lower output of production/consumption (e.g. China). If u allow firms to raise power prices, then u got higher costs everywhere. No matter what, here are the losers
The losers are the net importers of fuels (orange in chart is fuels). They are everyone in Asia except Australia, Indonesia, and Malaysia (Brunei too but I don't use it). Tough choices ahead. Look at India. Not a huge trader but 3rd largest importer in Asia for consumption. And?
I explained last week that India source of electricity is coal (and also import oil for other uses) & coal reserves down. Meaning they have to face higher domestic auction prices or import expensive coal. Beyond coal, oil import is expensive too. Plus India demand is recovering!!
Preliminary data shows that merchandise exports rose 21% in September to USD33.4b, while imports jumped about 85% to $56.6, the trade ministry said. Oil imports surged 199% to $17.4bn!
Rupee weakened as a result. But don't despair, India should get decent capital inflows to help
And this is no BOP crisis (the ability to pay for imports) as India got plenty of reserves + capital flows likely decent.
Anyway, WINNERS? I pick Indonesia. Malaysia + Australia too but let me explain why not as good.
While Australia is the largest commodity trader in Asia - massive - it is mostly iron ore where it is getting its foreign FX. And iron ore is down as China curbs steel production + outlook on real estate sector meh (have u heard of Evergrande?) So? While fuels gain, iron ores sag
Malaysia also got goodies like natural gas etc but it also has tons of manu so its gains on natural gas is mitigated by the manufacturing sector sagged by higher input prices. Either way, still better off than the rest.
Indonesia is a clear gain. Got oil, natural gas, palm oil
You can see it in the bond market, FX etc that Indonesia is doing well & it remains my fav
Btw, u would have known this already if u followed my ASEAN supply chain note where I went through each country's trade structure.
U must know structure to decipher cyclical trends 🤗👈🏻.
Btw, equity analysts are cutting target prices of footwear stocks on supply issues on 4 October.
@Trinhnomics wrote a note on 12 August highlighting this will happen as ASEAN got Covid!!!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Two days after the elections & as Trump team prepares their team, let's talk about economic impact. This morning, I will read with you a few papers that have analyzed what he said as literal policy translation.
First, Trump 2.0 will not be as messy as Trump 1.0. Why? Well, dude is gonna prolly get enough people to approve his thousands of people that will be appointed so DC.
This is what you get when you have total power (likely House, Senate).
Second, he has done it already so got a few people in the bags to choose from and the troops in the GOP have rallied behind him.
What does that mean? Trumponomics is going to be pretty forceful, whatever that may be.
There are a few things we know that he is very consistent:
a) On domestic policy - he will like extend his Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) or basically corporate tax cuts and also income cuts. That will help boost economic growth but WIDENS THE DEFICIT.
b) On immigration - he will at the minimum TIGHTEN the policies. Whether he will actively deport all these people that entered illegally is a question mark. Irrespective, Biden towards the end of the term got the memo that the open border thing isn't good for politics and since tightened.
That said, he said he would deport so some deportation is likely. Magnitude is question mark.
Prabonomics Wish List: Higher Tax Revenue, More Social Welfare and Rapid GDP Growth.
A thread on Indonesia's 8th President who will lead Southeast Asia's largest economy & fourth most populous in the world in the next five years. Let's go! 🇮🇩
First, what is Prabonomics? Well, we don't know yet but he won on the promise of continuity of Jokonomics that comprised of infra capex, fiscal prudence, and downstreaming of metals (nickel).
Still, let's talk about his objectives. On the economy, he wants:
GDP to rise by 8% in the next 2-3 years (Jokowi only managed 4.1% on average in 10yrs and excluding Covid years then 5.1%) so that is raising GDP growth by 3-4% higher than its current batting average.
How will achieve this 3-4% higher average GDP growth?
Well, more social welfare spending is where we wants to do it. Basically, more free school food, more housing, more self sufficiency of food.
So a mix of social capital & some infra but generally more about social welfare vs the emphasis on highways and new capitals.
How much more? Well, he floated IDR450trn or 30bn for free school lunch for 81m Indonesian or 2% of GDP.
Here is a short thread on why China fiscal policy, specifically central government support, is sorely needed & monetary support so far is not enough.
First, China got triple D problems - deflation, debt, demographic. All going badly.
Regarding deflation, it reflects an imbalanced economy where supply-side support for a long time has led to too much supply relative to demand domestically.
The easiest way to see it? China's producer price index. It's -2.8%YoY for September 2024. Meaning, producers get less money for the same stuff they make vs last year.
Okay, how is this bad? Margin compression. Your revenue is lower if you are a producer. Or DECLINING INDUSTRIAL PROFITS.
The positive side of this equation is that as they produce so much stuff that is not in demand and prices are cheap, then they can sell ABROAD (exports) for much cheaper than the competition.
A cheaper yuan (meaning depreciated) also helped. All those reasons led to China gaining global market share in manufactured goods to the chagrin of big traders like the EU, South Korea, Japan, and even the not big trader like India that has a about USD100bn of deficit w/ China.
Okay, so it's a bright spot as it gets more income than it spends (imports) so it has a trade surplus.
But that is also a source of geopolitical tensions as other countries are not happy w/ their firms going out of business as they can't compete w/ Chinese goods that are literally deflated.
So tariffs are going up, started by Trump in 2018 but frankly increasingly the EU and likely more and more...
Great story about India rice policy. What I find interesting about this is of course the agriculture gets the most subsidy in the budget & one can say that India gives so much more to farmers and the sector than any sector by a wide margin.
That is a distortion that favors them as they are a powerful vote bank. But at the same time, the government also banned the exporting of rice when rice surged and that meant farmers couldn't make more money.
What India does with farming is very interesting. As it is a country with food surplus and the budget gives most weight to farming while most farmers remain very poor and more than 75% work for sub minimum wage.
India's central government expenditure budget. Rural development + agriculture gets so much.
There is a lot of talk about production linked incentives but it really just got 1.5bn in FY25. So that means this budget is just mostly agrarian.
Meanwhile, farmers were blocked from exporting rice, causing rice to rot. This is a policy to prevent rice price from rising, causing CPI to spike.
This is a sector worth paying attention to as most Indians live in rural areas & they matter even if farming is only 16% of GDP.
One of the reasons India deal with w/ the energy and thus the food crisis is that it is a country that has a SURPLUS in food. As in they EXPORT food.
So to make sure domestic prices & supply stay ample during GLOBAL SHORTAGES due to shocks, India curbed food exports from wheat to rice and sugar.
Meaning, India exported less & so the Philippines saw a huge increase in rice price imported (btw, good for Vietnam & Thailand obvs).
Modi reversed his non-basmati white rice introduced in July 2023 but still have export duty on parboiled rice and minimum price imposed on shipments abroad of the white variety of grain.
The best research on India is written by the @RBI and it's called the RBI Bulletin (very similar to BOE bulletin) & it's amazing. Go to the state of the economy for charts/details on what's going on in India & then they always have essays on specific issues.
Central banks are consistently the best place to get information on a particular country. I also like the RBA website as well. Enjoy!
We can read some of these together in case you find it intimidating reading central bank language.
Germany is in structural decline & the path for that was waved by Angela Merkel who:
a) Allowed for mass irregular migration since 2015 that paved ways for Brexit, the far right rise in Germany and Europe
b) Appeasing Russia after its annexation of Crimea and expansion dependency on Russian gas
c) Phasing out nuclear energy.
As a result, Germany today deals with HIGHER input costs (energy is obvs) & also the political fallout of irregular migration.
Sholz of course is a worse politician than Angela Merkel but the path of its demise is paved by her.
The fact that China has pursued:
a) Expansion of coal, solar, wind, and nuclear to REDUCE INPUT COSTS
b) Subsidies in high-tech
c) Allowed for it to be competitive despite higher tariffs in Europe.
Meanwhile, Sholz asleep at the wheels. This is his reaciton: “Our country cannot and must not get used to this,” he went on. “The AfD is damaging Germany. It is weakening the economy, dividing society and ruining the country’s reputation.”
Germany doesn't understand that it cannot pursue its current path of extreme liberalism that worsens its competitiveness and destabilize its own society & expect to do well to lead Europe out of this mess.
Extreme liberalism can only exist in a vacuum or hypothesized world.
We exist in a world of limited resources. Countries like China are just better organized. Believe it or not. Sholz has no clue & will lose in 2025 but before he is gone he is still around to make a big mess.
Continuing to close the last 3 nuclear plants was a disaster.