Good morning from Poland 🇵🇱☀️ ! Shall we speak a bit about Asian economics, namely Asia & oil today?
Before we talk about Asia & oil, let's go through data we didn't (Friday was a holiday in Hong Kong & I was flying & don't forget that mainland China is off this week). Remember that China manufacturing PMI (state) was bad on power outages + demand.
But EM ex Asia doing better.
Notably, India is doing better, another month of expansion - we'll speak about why that will put some pressure on the current account. Indonesia great! Again, IDR is my favorite EM Asia FX at the moment for reasons u know - got better mobility + amazing trade + high yield. Good!!
Vietnam still doing very badly but that was September & the heat it got for shutting down factories will lead to normalization/living w/ the virus. Other ASEAN also doing better. Look at Malaysia. The Philippines also a bit better.
Overall, weak but trend is on the mend!
Now that you see some activity indicators, let's talk about oil & Asia. When people say that in the macro world, 2 things: impact on CPI and of course the balance of payment - can u afford high oil prices & what meaning to FX etc. What are the CPI trends? Not that high like PPI.
You can juxtapose Asian CPI with Western CPI (I'm in the West now but the East of the West, as in Eastern Europe), which went way higher & many much higher than in Asia. US CPI on par w/ India for example!!! But not just the US.
Anyway, back to Asia. PPI higher in Asia though!
Which will dominate? Higher costs via supply shocks or demand still dampened by Covid etc? We did a quantitative analysis & found that historically, Asian CPI is much more impacted by demand shocks.
We say (& been proven right so far) that CPI not a huge concern if demand down.
Now, how do u link news like higher oil prices/power shocks to structures of economies & distilling losers/winners.
1st, let's look at trade in Asia (chart show net): We import commodities & export manufactured goods for the most part as we're people rich & resource poor.👈🏻
So?
The largest deficit of commodity goes to China, Japan, South Korea etc. Basically the traders. They take their comparative advantage of people + capital & import commodities & add value to it & then export goods like textiles, electronics, cars, chips. China biggest trader of all
When oil/energy/commodities go higher, that means Asia's input costs go higher (by that I mean manufacturers') & u see that in PPI.
Note CPI hasn't gone up much as China CPI sub 1%. So? Manufacturers feel SQUEEZED. Hence PMIs terrible. Need to raise prices or reduce production.
News about China power outages is about how the industry is structured. Coal is key for electricity (>70% of electricity) but domestic coal production reduced + imported coal prices went higher + prices suppressed so few incentives to produce more for smaller players. So outages.
And that story is played out across the world for places with higher demand for power/commodity/energy but supply suppressed for many reasons (low investment due to change of energy strategy to less coal & more green etc). Choices must be made between prices & quantity of energy.
These aren't good choices. If u lower quantity consumed not through higher efficiency but sheer outages, then u got lower output of production/consumption (e.g. China). If u allow firms to raise power prices, then u got higher costs everywhere. No matter what, here are the losers
The losers are the net importers of fuels (orange in chart is fuels). They are everyone in Asia except Australia, Indonesia, and Malaysia (Brunei too but I don't use it). Tough choices ahead. Look at India. Not a huge trader but 3rd largest importer in Asia for consumption. And?
I explained last week that India source of electricity is coal (and also import oil for other uses) & coal reserves down. Meaning they have to face higher domestic auction prices or import expensive coal. Beyond coal, oil import is expensive too. Plus India demand is recovering!!
Preliminary data shows that merchandise exports rose 21% in September to USD33.4b, while imports jumped about 85% to $56.6, the trade ministry said. Oil imports surged 199% to $17.4bn!
Rupee weakened as a result. But don't despair, India should get decent capital inflows to help
And this is no BOP crisis (the ability to pay for imports) as India got plenty of reserves + capital flows likely decent.
Anyway, WINNERS? I pick Indonesia. Malaysia + Australia too but let me explain why not as good.
While Australia is the largest commodity trader in Asia - massive - it is mostly iron ore where it is getting its foreign FX. And iron ore is down as China curbs steel production + outlook on real estate sector meh (have u heard of Evergrande?) So? While fuels gain, iron ores sag
Malaysia also got goodies like natural gas etc but it also has tons of manu so its gains on natural gas is mitigated by the manufacturing sector sagged by higher input prices. Either way, still better off than the rest.
Indonesia is a clear gain. Got oil, natural gas, palm oil
You can see it in the bond market, FX etc that Indonesia is doing well & it remains my fav
Btw, u would have known this already if u followed my ASEAN supply chain note where I went through each country's trade structure.
U must know structure to decipher cyclical trends 🤗👈🏻.
Btw, equity analysts are cutting target prices of footwear stocks on supply issues on 4 October.
@Trinhnomics wrote a note on 12 August highlighting this will happen as ASEAN got Covid!!!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The RBI just cut the cash rate by 50bps and kept the policy rate on hold at 6.5% as slowing government spending and a weakening manufacturing sector is dragging down GDP growth.
This is my short thread on examining the India-Japan investment and trade relationship & why they haven't changed much in 10 years despite India being a big domestic demand market that Japan needs.
I argue that this is symptomatic of what is happening to Indian firms themselves. They find it hard to scale and leverage the labor endowments the country has.
How do we change this? Well, by changing the norms of thinking that the government needs to micro manage everything. It should set framework but let Indian private sector flourish.
Let's go.
First, what is the India Japan relationship? Well, it's getting better but remains SMALL relative to the ASEAN Japan (Vietnam Japan for example). Japan investment to India despite India being a huge domestic demand market that is super complementary to Japan weak demographic trends is at 4% of total. Look at ASEAN. Yes, at peak around 28% and settling about 24% of total.
India is a ginormous market. So why growing just from 2 to 4% of total???
Now let's look at Japan imports from India - it basically remains flat at a small level of 1% of total. Meanwhile, imports from China is 22% and ASEAN 15%.
So Japanese FDI to India has increased to 4% of total but imports remain small.
Basically this relationship remains small and has a lot of scope to grow.
I'm going to Delhi this Thursday for the India Japan Conference. Excited to go. The key thing I will emphasize while India is how much India needs manufacturing.
The contraction of manufacturing in Q3 2024 led to sharp slowdown of GDP to 5.4%YoY.
India needs manufacturing not just for cyclical growth but social stability. There is no way you can absorb that many people from the rural sector without manufacturing.
The government needs to put all its effort behind this. Manufacturing is the future. It is an essential ingredient to growth.
Why? Because we still live in a material world. How do I know? India has about USD100bn deficit with China in manufactured goods.
Shared my views in this documentary:
My op-ed on India jobs & manufacturing and why there must be more emphasis on manufacturing:
Are you ready for a Trump tariff thread and what this means? This is going to be a bit of a technical one but I'll make it easy & fun & we'll go through literature & analysis.
We start with the basics. How does tariff work? First, as you know, the US is a big free trader. Still is despite tons of tariffs on China. So goods in the US generally are tariff free to import & hence proliferation of foreign goods in the US.
But that being said, it does impose tariffs & duties. Sometimes overtly targeting a specific product to protect domestic sector due to lobbying. Anti-dumping duties is an example. A country that is not a market economy is an easy target (China, Vietnam) as u can say those countries have subsidized excessive production & hence duties.
But comes Trump. He has been consistent since the 1980s about the US trade deficit which he has railed against in public interviews and what does he do.
He started a US-China trade-war on washing machine duties.
Before we talk about what has Trump 1.0 (=first term 2017 to 2020) & Biden (2020 to 2024) done in terms of tariffs, I want to talk about the practicality of WHO PAYS FOR TARIFFS.
The IMPORTERS pay for tariffs. By that, American importers pay for tariffs. So when an item say costs 100 goes to 125 because of a 25% tariffs, there are a few things that COMPANIES that import can do.
They can PASS ON that cost to CUSTOMERS (buyers of goods). They can ABSORB that cost. They can FIND A NEW SOURCE to import. Or the SELLER can make the item cost 80 or a 20% reduction of previous price to then when the seller pay 25% that is just 100 BUCKS of import costs so the SELLER ABSORBS this margin compression.
That 25% goes to the IRS as government revenue. Who pays for it? Well, it depends on who ABSORBS THAT COSTS of 25% but surely 25% tariffs happen.
Two days after the elections & as Trump team prepares their team, let's talk about economic impact. This morning, I will read with you a few papers that have analyzed what he said as literal policy translation.
First, Trump 2.0 will not be as messy as Trump 1.0. Why? Well, dude is gonna prolly get enough people to approve his thousands of people that will be appointed so DC.
This is what you get when you have total power (likely House, Senate).
Second, he has done it already so got a few people in the bags to choose from and the troops in the GOP have rallied behind him.
What does that mean? Trumponomics is going to be pretty forceful, whatever that may be.
There are a few things we know that he is very consistent:
a) On domestic policy - he will like extend his Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) or basically corporate tax cuts and also income cuts. That will help boost economic growth but WIDENS THE DEFICIT.
b) On immigration - he will at the minimum TIGHTEN the policies. Whether he will actively deport all these people that entered illegally is a question mark. Irrespective, Biden towards the end of the term got the memo that the open border thing isn't good for politics and since tightened.
That said, he said he would deport so some deportation is likely. Magnitude is question mark.
Prabonomics Wish List: Higher Tax Revenue, More Social Welfare and Rapid GDP Growth.
A thread on Indonesia's 8th President who will lead Southeast Asia's largest economy & fourth most populous in the world in the next five years. Let's go! 🇮🇩
First, what is Prabonomics? Well, we don't know yet but he won on the promise of continuity of Jokonomics that comprised of infra capex, fiscal prudence, and downstreaming of metals (nickel).
Still, let's talk about his objectives. On the economy, he wants:
GDP to rise by 8% in the next 2-3 years (Jokowi only managed 4.1% on average in 10yrs and excluding Covid years then 5.1%) so that is raising GDP growth by 3-4% higher than its current batting average.
How will achieve this 3-4% higher average GDP growth?
Well, more social welfare spending is where we wants to do it. Basically, more free school food, more housing, more self sufficiency of food.
So a mix of social capital & some infra but generally more about social welfare vs the emphasis on highways and new capitals.
How much more? Well, he floated IDR450trn or 30bn for free school lunch for 81m Indonesian or 2% of GDP.
Here is a short thread on why China fiscal policy, specifically central government support, is sorely needed & monetary support so far is not enough.
First, China got triple D problems - deflation, debt, demographic. All going badly.
Regarding deflation, it reflects an imbalanced economy where supply-side support for a long time has led to too much supply relative to demand domestically.
The easiest way to see it? China's producer price index. It's -2.8%YoY for September 2024. Meaning, producers get less money for the same stuff they make vs last year.
Okay, how is this bad? Margin compression. Your revenue is lower if you are a producer. Or DECLINING INDUSTRIAL PROFITS.
The positive side of this equation is that as they produce so much stuff that is not in demand and prices are cheap, then they can sell ABROAD (exports) for much cheaper than the competition.
A cheaper yuan (meaning depreciated) also helped. All those reasons led to China gaining global market share in manufactured goods to the chagrin of big traders like the EU, South Korea, Japan, and even the not big trader like India that has a about USD100bn of deficit w/ China.
Okay, so it's a bright spot as it gets more income than it spends (imports) so it has a trade surplus.
But that is also a source of geopolitical tensions as other countries are not happy w/ their firms going out of business as they can't compete w/ Chinese goods that are literally deflated.
So tariffs are going up, started by Trump in 2018 but frankly increasingly the EU and likely more and more...