Trinh Profile picture
Oct 4, 2021 21 tweets 8 min read Read on X
Good morning from Poland 🇵🇱☀️ ! Shall we speak a bit about Asian economics, namely Asia & oil today?
Before we talk about Asia & oil, let's go through data we didn't (Friday was a holiday in Hong Kong & I was flying & don't forget that mainland China is off this week). Remember that China manufacturing PMI (state) was bad on power outages + demand.

But EM ex Asia doing better.
Notably, India is doing better, another month of expansion - we'll speak about why that will put some pressure on the current account. Indonesia great! Again, IDR is my favorite EM Asia FX at the moment for reasons u know - got better mobility + amazing trade + high yield. Good!!
Vietnam still doing very badly but that was September & the heat it got for shutting down factories will lead to normalization/living w/ the virus. Other ASEAN also doing better. Look at Malaysia. The Philippines also a bit better.

Overall, weak but trend is on the mend!
Now that you see some activity indicators, let's talk about oil & Asia. When people say that in the macro world, 2 things: impact on CPI and of course the balance of payment - can u afford high oil prices & what meaning to FX etc. What are the CPI trends? Not that high like PPI.
You can juxtapose Asian CPI with Western CPI (I'm in the West now but the East of the West, as in Eastern Europe), which went way higher & many much higher than in Asia. US CPI on par w/ India for example!!! But not just the US.

Anyway, back to Asia. PPI higher in Asia though!
Which will dominate? Higher costs via supply shocks or demand still dampened by Covid etc? We did a quantitative analysis & found that historically, Asian CPI is much more impacted by demand shocks.

We say (& been proven right so far) that CPI not a huge concern if demand down.
Now, how do u link news like higher oil prices/power shocks to structures of economies & distilling losers/winners.

1st, let's look at trade in Asia (chart show net): We import commodities & export manufactured goods for the most part as we're people rich & resource poor.👈🏻

So?
The largest deficit of commodity goes to China, Japan, South Korea etc. Basically the traders. They take their comparative advantage of people + capital & import commodities & add value to it & then export goods like textiles, electronics, cars, chips. China biggest trader of all
When oil/energy/commodities go higher, that means Asia's input costs go higher (by that I mean manufacturers') & u see that in PPI.

Note CPI hasn't gone up much as China CPI sub 1%. So? Manufacturers feel SQUEEZED. Hence PMIs terrible. Need to raise prices or reduce production.
News about China power outages is about how the industry is structured. Coal is key for electricity (>70% of electricity) but domestic coal production reduced + imported coal prices went higher + prices suppressed so few incentives to produce more for smaller players. So outages.
And that story is played out across the world for places with higher demand for power/commodity/energy but supply suppressed for many reasons (low investment due to change of energy strategy to less coal & more green etc). Choices must be made between prices & quantity of energy.
These aren't good choices. If u lower quantity consumed not through higher efficiency but sheer outages, then u got lower output of production/consumption (e.g. China). If u allow firms to raise power prices, then u got higher costs everywhere. No matter what, here are the losers
The losers are the net importers of fuels (orange in chart is fuels). They are everyone in Asia except Australia, Indonesia, and Malaysia (Brunei too but I don't use it). Tough choices ahead. Look at India. Not a huge trader but 3rd largest importer in Asia for consumption. And?
I explained last week that India source of electricity is coal (and also import oil for other uses) & coal reserves down. Meaning they have to face higher domestic auction prices or import expensive coal. Beyond coal, oil import is expensive too. Plus India demand is recovering!!
Preliminary data shows that merchandise exports rose 21% in September to USD33.4b, while imports jumped about 85% to $56.6, the trade ministry said. Oil imports surged 199% to $17.4bn!

Rupee weakened as a result. But don't despair, India should get decent capital inflows to help
And this is no BOP crisis (the ability to pay for imports) as India got plenty of reserves + capital flows likely decent.

Anyway, WINNERS? I pick Indonesia. Malaysia + Australia too but let me explain why not as good.
While Australia is the largest commodity trader in Asia - massive - it is mostly iron ore where it is getting its foreign FX. And iron ore is down as China curbs steel production + outlook on real estate sector meh (have u heard of Evergrande?) So? While fuels gain, iron ores sag
Malaysia also got goodies like natural gas etc but it also has tons of manu so its gains on natural gas is mitigated by the manufacturing sector sagged by higher input prices. Either way, still better off than the rest.

Indonesia is a clear gain. Got oil, natural gas, palm oil
You can see it in the bond market, FX etc that Indonesia is doing well & it remains my fav

Btw, u would have known this already if u followed my ASEAN supply chain note where I went through each country's trade structure.

U must know structure to decipher cyclical trends 🤗👈🏻.
Btw, equity analysts are cutting target prices of footwear stocks on supply issues on 4 October.

@Trinhnomics wrote a note on 12 August highlighting this will happen as ASEAN got Covid!!!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Trinh

Trinh Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Trinhnomics

Apr 15
Let's talk about Trump tariffs. They are up, it's a question of whether how much, to whom, which sector rather than whether.

I want to clarify a simple fact that needs to be nailed home - trade and investment go together. Tariffs are a friction to trade & if you just take the idea that tariffs are going up (we'll discuss soon the details) then INVESTMENT IS GOING TO BE RESHUFFLED.

Half of global FDI is US driven. Global investment will be reshuffled. Okay, let's talk about first w/ who is LEAST TARGETED & we got to who is MOST.
Trump trade authorities come from 3 sources:
1) International Emergency Economics Power Act (IEEPA) to give the president the power to declare a national emergency & impose tariffs.

He did this w/ fentanyl for Mexico & Canada + Reciprocal tariffs.

2) Section 232 Tariffs that basically gives the Secretary of Commerce (Lutnick) the power to do a COMPREHENSIVE investitations to determine sectors that undermine US national security

3) Section 301 Tariffs - Basically to target a specific country, this one is a China tariff one and the power goes under USTR.Image
If power is given to the president and one can say whether he's abusing power or not or there's too much power concentrated in one (designed as such to address areas that Congress is too slow), can it be taken away?

Yes, but not by the Supreme Court because it would say that this is a political issue & to be solved politically.

So it would take Congress. But while there is something going on, this is very unlikely. Congress is too, well, I don't mean to say anything negative but you know what Mark Twain said about Congress, to deal with this.

So we are stuck w/ tariffs & unless tariffs call the house to fall down, tariffs are here.

Let's talk then big picture vs going down on Trump cards/flip flip because I think the chaos is by design & not an accident.

Okay, who hasn't been tariffed? Mexico and Canada but specifically only USMCA content.
Read 15 tweets
Apr 14
The questions is what is Trump's team plan for getting these materials for the US now that we are on track for a Cold War.

If globalization didn't consider the strategic aspect of production, as in offshored so much that you no longer have what you need for production and blind faith in a globalized worth that has few if not just 1 supplier, then what is the game plan for deglobalization?
Interestingly:

a) Japanese companies have more than a year of supply as they experienced this with China in 2010 when China used rare-earth as leverage in geopolitics;
b) American companies have LITTLE OR NO INVENTORY;
c) The only US mine - Mountain Pass - not commercially viable until end of the year.

So I guess they will have to buy it via third market that will mark this stuff up. Tariff arbitrage is a new industry.Image
Btw, the export controls aren't just for the US - they are tightening it for any country, including Japan and Germany.

So China is also weaponizing its supply chain chokehold for the global economy. The question is what is everyone doing about it to break it. Image
Read 4 tweets
Apr 11
Made in China is essentially done in the US if tariffs stay where they are. For final goods, it's just a one-off shift in price & transitory. That to me is so shocking if you think about it.

But what about intermediates? That's about half of total imports. Because it impacts production in the US and will cause supply shocks & won't be transitory.
Trump Team on Reciprocal Tariff Day or "Building Leverage Day" or playing all his cards at once:

I'll smack everyone with tariffs because I am #1 in importing. If you have a trade deficit, you get a tariff.

Actually, on second thought, I'll also tariff my net customer Australia who buys more from us and has zero tariff.

Take that! How do you like Liberation Day!!! Winning.Image
Everyone is shocked, sad that the #1 customer of merchandise trade (btw, the US has NET SURPLUS IN SERVICES, which means it rips everyone off in services but oh well) decided to punish so most just laid low & hope for the best.

China retaliated.

What is interesting is that most haven't played their cards because they don't want to. They want to continue to sell. But if they are pushed to not sell, well, they will think of what "leverage" do they have.

Let's think. Using Trump's Team logic, let's name a few leverage others have:

US SURPLUS IN SERVICES - that's the EU strategy in case talks fail to knee cap US tech. But it's not in the EU interest to do this but they will do it if they feel they are pushed.
Read 10 tweets
Apr 3
This is a thread on Trump's latest barrage of tariffs:
1) What are they?
2) Who is most impacted?
3) And what are the Asian economies going to do about it, short-term and medium term?

@sharp_writing
asia.nikkei.com/Opinion/Vietna…
Trump reciprocal tariffs are not about "cheating" and differential in "tariff rates" or "non-tariff" barriers. They are simply benchmarked using outcome & calculation using bilateral trade balance divided by US exports divided by 2. Yep, basically, trade balance. So?
a) Everyone gets 10% at the minimum - so Australia, which has a trade-surplus and an ally, whelp, gets 10%; Trump team high-fiving each other on this win.
b) And then there's the mid range of 20s - Yes, Japan + Malaysia, South Korea and India. SK is supposedly having an FTA with the US or free-trade and there's no tariff barrier between the two but you know, who cares, let's slap this one because they somehow "cheat" and "rip us off" because, well, we import Korean stuff like cars and ships and makeup.
c) Indonesia, Taiwan and Thailand get slapped with 30s ish level and it doesn't really make sense but whatever. Oh, interestingly, semiconductor is exempt, which is like more than 50% of Taiwan's export to the US so I mean, why be so mean unless they are exempting it to tax later.
d) China gets 54% or actually part of the 30s - 34% to be precise and with 20% that means it's 54% and not sure if this is on top of what other tariffs. Anyway, we know they are hawkish on China so Vietnam is interesting because, little Vietnam has been a good trade partner but gets slapped anyway with 46%. Yep, 46%.

Link to research:
research.natixis.com/Site/en/public…Image
So remember that they just want to come across to the home base pretty hawkish and so if you read their tariff levels for some countries, it doesn't make sense. But the base loves it. Make America Great Again.

Poor Bangladesh, Cambodia, Laos, and Myanmar all get pretty high level. In fact, super targeted.

Remember that the US is supposedly nice and trying to help these countries develop. Nah. Forget that. Give them a ton of tariffs to make it hurt. We dismantle USAID, we don't give out support and we now will take away your ability to sell your cheap labor to improve your livelihood so that, well, Americans can pay more for tshirts and socks.

Vietnam, the US bombed heavily during the Vietnam War, and now they have picked themselves up selling things cheaply made and things have improved a bit but let's just make it hurt. 46%.

Trump is waging an all-out trade-war on Asia. Southeast Asia. I feel really bad for Myanmar that got hit pretty big after the earthquake. Look how hard they hit these competitors to the mighty USA. Look at Cambodia, Laos etc. Bangladesh!

1. Cambodia - 49%
2. Laos - 48%
3. Madagascar - 47%
4. Vietnam - 46%
5. Myanmar (Burma) - 44%
6. Sri Lanka - 44%
7. Bangladesh - 37%
8. Serbia - 37%
9. Botswana - 37%
10. Thailand - 36%
11. China - 34%
12. Taiwan - 32%
13. Indonesia - 32%
14. Switzerland - 31%
15. South Africa - 30%
16. Pakistan - 29%
17. Tunisia - 28%
18. Kazakhstan - 27%
19. India - 26%
20. South Korea - 25%
21. Japan - 24%
22. Malaysia - 24%
23. Côte d'Ivoire - 21%
24. European Union - 20%
25. Jordan - 20%
26. Nicaragua - 18%
27. Philippines - 17%

whitehouse.gov/presidential-a…
Read 15 tweets
Apr 1
At the Asia Society to listen to Asia’s view of Trump 2.0. Will share later ideas shared! Image
China:

Highly popular in China as he is entertaining as he has made China great again. His pressure has pushed China reforms forward. China has become more resilient and less reliant against the US. Chinese indigenous tech is decent & confidence domestically is highest ever. External pressure has rallied stakeholders around the central leadership for advancing tech & expanding domestic demand. Exports will not be a key driver & infra ROI down. China has benefited from Trump pressure.

Trump has a good story teller for China as Trump has helped the China story. The Chinese is projecting stability in a more volatile world & saying that China is open for business while the door is closing by the US.

DowJones & SPX down while China is up. Nasdaq down & HSI up. All thanks to Trump.
Middle East:

Everything Trump does in the Middle East is for Trump to focus to China. Trump puts on the table risky strategies. He wants to bully Iran to the table. Bombing Yemen is an example.

No one takes Trump seriously. What he says versus what he does. What he says is the maximum. Example is Palestine. The best strategy is to wait him out & Iran strategy is waiting him out & Iran has no leverage except time.

Time showed his hand of not having time. In a hurry.

People are convinced that Trump is going to collapse in six months. So give him something but not in a hurry to give him a good deal.

Considerations. Trump is willing to negotiate with Russian directly. He is willing to play outside US foreign policy. His handling of Zelenskyy is like a loan shark makes it difficult for Iranians to respond to him.

For Iranians, it is not what he tells them but what he does to others. For him to have wins quickly, he would have to pay the price.

He can’t give Iran what he wants with Israel. The Middle East problem won’t be solved easily.
Read 16 tweets
Mar 31
Trump "Liberation Day" is coming & if it is anything to go by like other tariff days, it won't feel "liberating." Why? Because he is front-loading bad news.

It sounds crazy but I have given it some thoughts and here are what I think his short-term objectives. Image
First, we know he has 20% tariffs on China on top of others so we are now got a lot of friction to trade with China, which the Trump administration sees as its #1 security threat.

But isn't happy with this friction to trade and investment and keen to close loop holes. Remember that Biden also increased tons of investment and tariff curbs with China.

How to close it is the question? It requires others to do it. Who are the others? The easiest is Mexico and Canada as they have USMCA, which Trump agreed in 2020 (previously NAFTA).Image
There are clues to what Trump wants from Canada and Mexico in the latest 25% AUTO tariff.

Why? There are exemptions to USMCA for US content and also the implementation of tariff is contingent on them figuring out how this 25% tariff is going to work.

Meaning, USMCA essentially is still in force but only exemptions in USMCA.

But Trump isn't happy w/ current USMCA. Wants change.
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(