Dear Twitter: saw this inexpressibly hot woman at @DragonCon wearing a @lovedeathrobots shirt. Should I tell her I wrote for the series, or just play it cool, please advise
Update: I HAVE MADE MY MOVE
Update: I casually dropped that I am having a reading today at 11:30 in the Centennial I room of the Hyatt and she said she might attend! Also check out this selfie we did, I'm so cool and collected you can only barely see my uvula.
The major editorial note in my latest work is "you sure have people nodding a lot."
Yes, I do, he said, nodding.
(The extraneous nods are being taken out. But they will still be implied, I assure you.)
Also, stuff like this is why it's good to have editors. They're reading the manuscript for the first time so every little tic and textual inconsistency your brain has longed paved over stands out for them. Some they can fix for you; others they need you to fix. Useful.
Responded to my edit notes for Dispatcher 3 and sent the manuscript back. It's now roughly 800 words shorter, a smidgen more clear, and with quite a bit less nodding.
1. Team Scalzi was approached today with a query about a "shopping agreement" for one of my properties. A "shopping agreement" is basically where a film/TV producer asks permission to pitch a work in a room without having paid an option up front...
2. ... with the idea being that if they get a studio/streamer/network/etc excited about it, they can quickly put together a package and then an option would follow after. And if not, well, then... not.
So, I'm not a fan of shopping agreements, and let me tell you why.
3. (Disclaimer: What follows is a disquisition about a first world problem told from the perspective of someone with a non-trivial amount of privilege, etc BUT which I still think will be useful to other writers and such. Mileage may vary, and all that. We good? Okay then.)