What if... HealthNerd's investigation into IVM is actually vindicating IVM instead of proving it fraudulent? Well, A BMJ article claims we should expect 20% medical research to be Fraud. That's more than HN has found out of the studies he researched. Not randomized, but even so.
https://twitter.com/alexandrosM/status/1445202282937667593
Yes, this is tongue in cheek. But this is the kind of background work he should have done before dragging the names of hundreds of researchers through the mud. Without a baseline, the implication is that we're looking for 0% bad papers, which is a fallacy. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Base_rate…
It's OK. It's not like there's a literal pandemic going on and many of these researchers are trying to help, but don't speak English as their first language, nor understand social media. After they get piled on, they'll get the message.
https://twitter.com/Francin2798/status/1445206589485445121?s=19
Yup. He's got strong counterarguments folks.
https://twitter.com/GidMK/status/1445208031034105863?s=19
He tried to put together some kind of counterargument. By just flat-out lying about what the article says. Weird. 
https://twitter.com/GidMK/status/1445209226188505090?s=19
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
