Simon Evans Profile picture
Oct 5, 2021 11 tweets 7 min read Read on X
Super excited to finally share this updated analysis on the countries most responsible for climate change, now including all sources of CO2:

US 509GtCO2
CN 284
RU 172
BR 113
ID 103
DE 88
IN 86
UK 74
JP 68
CA 65

1/n

carbonbrief.org/analysis-which…
We first published analysis of cumulative historical CO2 in 2019 & I've been talking / thinking about it ever since

Our new article (by me) + animation by @tomoprater tries to answer all the questions we've had over the years – please do read

2/

carbonbrief.org/analysis-which…
We've made 4 big additions:

📅fully updated through 2021
🌲CO2 from land-use change & forestry
🚢analysis of consumption emissions
👪analysis of cumulative CO2 per capita

3/

carbonbrief.org/analysis-which…
Since 1850, humans have collectively pumped more than 2,500GtCO2 into the atmosphere

2/3 from burning fossil fuels
1/3 from land-use change & forestry

That's directly linked to the 1.2C of warming to date

4/

carbonbrief.org/analysis-which…
So we've used up 86% of the carbon budget for a 50-50 chance of staying below 1.5C – or 89% of the budget for a 2/3 probability

There's just 10 / 7 years of budget left (😱)

carbonbrief.org/analysis-which…
Who got us into this mess? That question is at the heart of climate justice debates

Top 20 countries for cumulative CO2 since 1850 is topped by the US (20%) & China (11%)

Also v striking to see 🇧🇷🇮🇩 on the list thanks to deforestation…

6/

carbonbrief.org/analysis-which…
We also looked at consumption-based emissions accounting of CO2 in traded goods

I was surprised how little difference this made

It adds 0.3 percentage points share of cumulative total to US & JP, 0.2 for UK & DE; 1.1 points less for CN

7/

carbonbrief.org/analysis-which…
Then we looked at cumulative CO2 per capita…

It massively changes the rankings but breaks the direct link to current warming

And the results depend strongly on methodology

For me, it raises more Qs than it answers, but v interesting all the same

8/

carbonbrief.org/analysis-which…
For me personally – as a massive geek – the story of the data itself is fascinating

🤓🤓🤓

I hope, like me, you enjoy learning about what it is & where it comes from – I learned so much while researching this article

9/

carbonbrief.org/analysis-which…
I'd like to conclude by thanking a long list of ppl that helped with this analysis

Julia Pongratz
Gregg Marland
CDIAC
@Skee_WHRC
@robbie_andrew
@Peters_Glen
@PFriedling
@redouad
@OurWorldInData
@Carbon_Monitor

10/

carbonbrief.org/analysis-which…
Finally, thanks to @dpcarrington for some great coverage of our analysis at @guardianeco

theguardian.com/environment/20…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Simon Evans

Simon Evans Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DrSimEvans

Jun 25, 2025
NEW: UK climate advisers now "more optimistic" net-zero goals can be met

🎯Net-zero "possible" + "good for economy"
📉CO2 halved vs 1990
📈More "credible" policies
🚘🏡EV/heat pumps soaring
But…
⚡"Critical" to cut power prices
✈️Flight CO2 "risk"

1/9 Image
For the first time I can remember, the CCC says its progress report is "optimistic" about UK climate goals being hit. Interim chair Prof Piers Forster says he is "more optimistic" than last yr due to last govt's policies starting to deliver + changes since Labour took office

2/9 Image
Another notable change is that the CCC seems to be getting less prescriptive…

CCC has faced (inaccurate) charges that it has, in effect, set govt policy. But it's now being clearer than ever that it only offers advice – and policy is up to govt.

3/9 Image
Read 9 tweets
Jun 17, 2025
IEA: Oil still on track to peak by 2030; oil for fuel to peak in 2027

"annual growth slows…to just a trickle over the next several years, with a small decline expected in 2030, based on today’s policy settings and market trends"

Here are some of the most striking charts 🧵
1/8 Image
In recent years, global oil demand has been almost entirely driven by growth in China…

…and that party is now over

Equally, US "dominance" of rising oil supply is also a thing of the past
2/8 Image
Since last year, the IEA has raised its oil demand outlook for the US, due to EV rollbacks etc, but it has simultaneously cut its outlook for China by the same amount

So global demand in 2030 is right where the IEA thought it would be last year
3/8 Image
Read 8 tweets
May 15, 2025
Could this be the biggest climate story of the year?

For the first time on record, China's emissions are falling due to clean energy growth, not slow power demand

Full analysis + outlook by Lauri Myllyvirta:


1/7 carbonbrief.org/analysis-clean…Image
In Q1 of 2025, the clean-energy driven drop in power sector CO2 outweighed small increases in other sectors of China's economy, driving a 1.6% fall year-on-year overall


2/7 carbonbrief.org/analysis-clean…Image
The fall in power sector emissions came despite surging electricity demand growth

This is the first time on record that clean energy growth has been sufficient to cut into coal power, without the help of weak power demand


3/7 carbonbrief.org/analysis-clean…Image
Read 7 tweets
Apr 30, 2025
FACTCHECK: Almost all the headlines on Tony Blair / net-zero are *wildly* inaccurate

REALITY:

1️⃣Net-zero is *only way* to stop warming
2️⃣Blair calls for tech to "turbocharge our path to net-zero"
3️⃣He categorically *does not* say "net-zero is doomed to fail"

🧵
1/6 Image
Blair says a "strategy based on either 'phasing out' fossil fuels in the short term or limiting consumption is a strategy doomed to fail"

This is logically & categorically not the same as saying "net-zero is doomed to fail"

(If you can't see why, I can't help you)
2/6 Image
Nor does Blair say "current net-zero policies are doomed"

Because literally no govt in the world has a current net-zero policy to "phase out fossil fuels in the short term or limit consumption"

Instead, world's govts agreed at COP28 to "transition away from fossil fuels"
3/6 Image
Read 6 tweets
Feb 26, 2025
NEW: Official advisers CCC say UK shld cut emissions 87% by 2040

⚖️Net cost of net-zero 73% less than thought
💷Total cost to 2050 = £108bn (~£4bn/yr, 0.2% GDP)
🏡🚗H’hold energy/fuel bills to fall £1,400
🔌Electrification is key

THREAD + charts



1/10 carbonbrief.org/ccc-reducing-e…Image
Just so we're clear, let's start with why bother

We're seeing record heat – 100% caused by our emissions – and extreme weather, from floods to droughts to heatwaves

IPCC says net-zero is only way to stop this getting worse



2/10 carbonbrief.org/state-of-the-c…Image
There’s also the global energy crisis, which hit UK particularly hard due to reliance on imported gas, crushing household (and govt) finances

UK has spent £140bn on gas since the crisis began (!)

Shift to net-zero would massively reduce exposure to intl fossil fuel prices

3/10 Image
Read 17 tweets
Feb 10, 2025
THREAD: New UK govt contract with Drax biomass power plant

* 4-yr contract 2027-2031
* £113/MWh (2012 prices – £155 in today's money)
* Output cap of 6TWh (<2% of UK supplies, cf recent yrs 12-15TWh)
* CfD cost ~£500m/yr
* 100% of fuel must be "sustainable", up from 70%
1/5 Image
UK govt says the contract helps security of electricity supplies, but gives Drax a "much more limited role than today" ie it's limited to run at roughly 25% of its max output

This means it's mainly going to be running when it isn't windy


2/5 questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-statem…Image
Drax has had issues with existing 70% sustainable sourcing rule, but as it'll need less than half the fuel it has been buying to date, the new 100% rule looks more achievable

Notably, new contract terms allow govt to reclaim subsidy if rule not met


3/5 bbc.co.uk/news/articles/…Image
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(