As the debate in DC over the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan continues, worth remembering what happened last November: outside of the official channels, Trump's former body man & others drafted a rapid U.S. withdrawal memo, as @jonathanvswan reported. And Trump signed it.
Months later, @realBobWoodward and I included the text of the memo in PERIL: "... no later than 15 January 2021. Inform all allied and partner forces of the directives." cnn.com/2021/09/14/pol…
"What do you mean you have no idea? You're the national security adviser to the President?" Milley responded. "And the secretary of defense didn't know about this? ... How the hell does this happen?"
Our reporting shows that this episode was a pivot point and alarmed top national security officials for several reasons: Trump was showing his willingness to avoid consultations with them on major military decisions, all as he lashed out in a fury about his defeat...
and it could prompt sweeping, potentially catastrophic consequences in Afghanistan during an already fraught presidential transition
While some of the discussion of PERIL has focused on the Trump chapters, the Biden decision on Afghanistan, which was shaped, in part, by his own career and the lingering effects of Trump's decisions, is a critical part of the book and shows how presidencies can be intertwined.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Why reading the whole story in PERIL matters, beyond the headlines: the Eastman memo and argument wasn't just a pressure point on Pence. It was a pressure point on *Sen. Mike Lee,* one of the most influential legal minds in GOP. There was a push to get his cred, his endorsement.
Remember Trump on January 4? He says at Georgia Senate rally, "Mike Lee is here" and "I'm a little angry at him today. I just want Mike Lee to listen to what we're talking about."
Behind the scenes, Lee investigated the Eastman memo ahead of January 6. Chapters 40-42 detail how he made call after call, talking to state GOP leaders. Quickly found, on his own, no state was going to decertify their electors. "Not one house chamber in any of these states."
As we worked on PERIL, it became evident that Jan. 6 was not a sporadic moment, as some have tried to cast it. Our reporting shows it was the culmination of a coordinated pressure campaign. Giuliani & Bannon at the Willard. Eastman & Trump in Oval, etc. nbcnews.com/politics/polit…
While the riot, understandably, was at first the central focus, our book shows that the riot isn’t the whole story of Jan 6. The story is also what Trump and those around him were doing to use power to keep power in days prior, with Bannon & Trump seeing Jan. 6 as the reckoning.
I'm in touch with someone who's on the governors' call with President Trump right now. They and others listening in are alarmed. The president is urging governors to take back the streets, not be "weak," and use force as the nation faces growing racial unrest.
More: President Trump just berated governors and mayors for how they are handling the protests, calling them "fools," per person on the call.
Aides to governors say the president continues to talk. One describes it as a "rant." Says he keeps talking about the need to "dominate" the protests.
@rachaelmbade@seungminkim These Democrats said they believe having Hunter — or possibly Joe Biden — testify could backfire on Trump and the GOP, giving Biden and the party a platform to strike back and paint Republicans and the White House as obsessed with trying to damage Biden. washingtonpost.com/politics/senat…
@rachaelmbade@seungminkim The discussions about the Bidens are being closely held, and the issue is fraught for Democrats, due to the differing levels of support for Biden in a chamber stocked with presidential candidates and the clashing views on impeachment strategy.
My latest reporting w/ @rachaelmbade: Trump’s lawyers, Senate GOP allies work privately to ensure Bolton does not testify publicly, with ongoing if fluid discussions about asserting exec. priv. or, if need be, classifying it... washingtonpost.com/politics/trump…
@rachaelmbade One option being discussed, according to a senior administration official, would be to move Bolton’s testimony into a classified setting because of national security concerns, ensuring that it is not public.
@rachaelmbade But that proposal, discussed among some Senate Republicans in recent days, is seen as a final tool against Bolton becoming an explosive figure during the trial. First, Republicans involved in the discussions said, would come a fierce battle in the courts.