I'm entirely persuaded that Miller is an anti-Semite. I'm much less convinced that firing him wasn't a violation of academic freedom. Let me give a few quick words about why.
Last February, during a video conference on the UK Labour Party and (ironically) free speech, Miller described the criticism he's received from his own university's Jewish students and suggested that they were "pawns" of Israel.
Understandably, there was huge backlash. Denunciations in Parliament. Accusations of a hate crime. The whole sha-bang.
Anyway, while Miller has made a thousand reprehensible comments, it was this one about his school's own students that critics are now pointing to in order to reconcile his termination with their support for academic freedom. I don't think that'll wash.
The closest analogy to Miller's case I can think of is John McAdams, the "Marquette Warrior", who was suspended and threatened with loss of tenure because of critical comments he made on his personal blog about a grad student at his university.
Above, @conor64 makes the case for why critical language, even harsh criticism, of a student by a prof ought to be protected, so long as the prof isn't directly teaching the student. And I think that arg. is doubly true when the criticism is about an important political issue.
@conor64 For the opposite case (that when profs harshly criticize students in their university, they're violating their professional responsibilities and can be disciplined), see this smart piece from @tweetertation.
@conor64@tweetertation What you think about the Marquette Warrior case ought to influence how you feel about Miller's termination, even though (to repeat myself) Miller really is an anti-Semite.
@conor64@tweetertation More generally, I can think of all sorts of situations when it would be appropriate -- maybe even good! -- for faculty to harshly criticize their own institution's students. Even up to the point of calling them pawns of a foreign power.
Once again, I want to draw attention to the plight of Nathan Jun, a philosophy prof at Midwestern State University who recently resigned his tenured position. The reason? Death threats.
For a full background on Jun, see this article from last year in the Chronicle. The gist is that during the height of the George Floyd protests, he took to his personal Facebook page to harshly criticized police. What followed was month after unremitting month of hell.
You tell me how this is supposed to work. Explain it to me like I'm a total, gibbering moron. Because I must be. The alternative is that an entire county school board has gone 100% off the deep end.
Obviously this is being aimed at @nhannahjones at the 1619 Project.
One more audit study relevant to this issue. Does intraracial discrimination exist in college admittance? For example, do some institutions screen for *a certain kind of black student*? Thornhill 2019 says yes.
@mattyglesias Researchers sent two emails a piece to white admittance officers at 500+ universities. All were purportedly from black high school seniors inquiring about the school. The question was whether the student would get a response.
@mattyglesias Here's the trick. The emails were divided into four different narratives: apolitical and racially neutral, political and racially neutral (e.g. "I care about the environment"), racially salient and focused on culture/unity, and racially salient and focused on racial justice.
Very interesting piece by @DavidAFrench, who argues that a principal cause of the right/left disparity among students at Harvard or Yale is the differing cultures of college prep among cons vs. libs.
“The right-wing campaign against racial equity discussion, however, eclipses by several degrees of magnitude left-wing censoriousness.”
“The power that the latter is able to mobilize is dramatically overborne by the power of the former, especially its demonstrated capacity to mobilize governmental authority in furtherance of its aims.”
Is it anti-conservative discrimination? Empirical study of the question is still quite sparse, but the available evidence suggests no. Results from two audit studies below.
Druckman and Shafranek (2020) sent an email, purportedly from an interested high school senior, to 1,500+ universities. The "student" was variously identified as black/white, politically engaged/unengaged, liberal/conservative. How would response from the universities differ?
Very little, at least across most treatment conditions. Neither race nor political ideology made any statistically significant difference on its own. In other words, there was no evidence that admissions officers were racially or politically biased.